dev kapoor
20 June 2011 at 17:30
I entered into partnership with my friend to run a Cyber Cafe & both executed a Partnership deed & got it registered at 50 :50 profit & loss.The business runs in my shop.A rent note was drawn & our firm paid Rs.2000/- p.m.Now the other partner has become greedy.Since two years there is no business transaction & the shop is locked by him.He threatens if I talk for settlement.Plz advise me if-
1.I can go in the civil Court/Rent controller for suit for eviction?
2.Whether I can serve a notice for (a) default in payment;(c) closure of shop for more than a year consecutively;(c)Whether notice is to be served to my partner or the fir through other partner or to myself also in my capacity as partner i.e does law permit me double role,a partner as well as a tenant?
please cite some relevant law & judgments on the subjects as my lawyers are 'confused' and I am not satisfied so far by their advice.
I shall be obliged.This shop is my only source of income,which has stopped since two years.
Thanks & regards,experts,law knowing people.
Montiah
20 June 2011 at 16:42
Hello
I have borrowed a loan from a person of different nationality in UAE. My understanding with him is that I will give the loan back within 2 years. The contract signed also says that the amount is payable in June 2013.
My question is
1. Since I have left UAE and come back to India, can the person lodge a case against me whether in UAE or India to return the money earlier since I do not reside in UAE anymore.
2. Can he create any kind of problem for me? Can he force me to sell my assets here in India to repay him back?
3. Am I obliged to give him any other documents legal or otherwise.
Please answer only if you know the legalities. I have been getting vague answers to my previous question. I feel I know more than those answering the question.
prahalad bagda
20 June 2011 at 16:33
Dear Seniours and friends,
Aside of :- Mr. Ravikantji and Agarwal sir for advise to me land conversion.
Now I want land conversion rates in Municipalities, Municipal Corporation and Municipal Council areas in Rajasthan.
Anonymous
20 June 2011 at 15:59
Can anyone please attach a file or link of the case Bir Singh v Noor Ahmed, AIR 1972 GUAHATI 122. i tried looking for it in Manupatra, Indiankanoon, Judice and also on google......but could no find it ......need it badly....please help...
gagan jain
20 June 2011 at 14:52
how a public trust under bombay public trust act 1950 and societies registration act can over take a private trust in karnataka????
and under which act or statue wil it b govrened in karnataka?
can trustees of public trust can individually qwn the private trust as done in partnership?
RSVP
thanks
Nirav
20 June 2011 at 14:16
what are the proof that can be generated/obtained in case the address on reliance bill has no supporting evidence. also the current owner does not have n e agreement of property.
Also the address on ration card does not matches with reliance bill.
Anonymous
20 June 2011 at 12:32
SIR CAN PROMOTERS CAN WRITE IN THE AGREEMENT THESE POINTS & IS'T RIGHT?
The Vendors shall have the full and free right to make additions, alterations, constructions and/or re-constructions in any open and covered space at the Building Complex not expressed or intended to form part of the Common Areas and Installations and to deal with, use, transfer, convey, let out and/or grant the same (with or without any construction, addition or alteration) to any person for parking or any other purposes at such consideration and in such manner and on such terms and conditions as the Vendors shall, in its absolute discretion, think fit and proper.
Anonymous
20 June 2011 at 10:25
Is there any exemption on payment of Road tax and/or Road Permit on vehicles with yellow board in Karnataka?
Anand Bala
20 June 2011 at 08:25
Union of India (UOI) moved the court for declaration of title and possession of a land owned by X. The land is situated within the boundary of Secunderabad Cantonment.
As UOI lost their case in the trial court and again their appeal was disallowed by the first additional chief judge,they closed the road leading to the land citing reference to security reasons. The X has no other access.
As no such restriction to the free movement on the road (Articles 19 & 21 of our Constitution) was imposed in the past, it seems reasonable to assume that UOI have done this purposely.
Though it was UOI appeal,where X was only respondents, can X make an Interim application to the same court for civil contempt for willful disobedience, interference or tend to interfere with, or obstruct or tends to obstruct, the administration of the judgment pronounced by the Honorable I Additional Chief Judge on 18th January 2011.
Further,the road is within the boundary of cantonment and subject to Cantonment Act 2006 and closing of roads under Section 258 is the duty and responsibility of the SCB. But the roads were closed by nominated Board members from the Army by their unilateral decision,contravening the Section 258. All elected Board members of the SCB, representatives of public, requested the General Commanding Officer of the Army (nominated President for the Secunderabad cantonment Board) to open these roads but unfortunately, he turned turned his deaf ears. Other 3 nominated Board members from the Army were also silent.The issue was referred in the local daily news papers.
This amounts to nominated Board members' irregular action in exercise of a statutory power or otherwise that are not consistent with or in accordance with the rules and procedures as stipulated in the cantonment Act 2006. They being the Public servants as per Section 36 of the Cantonment Act 2006 and as per Section 21 of Indian Penal Code, can X hold these nominated Board members from Army individually liable under Public Servants' Personal Liability Act 2006 for compensation.
will be grateful for your help and a quick response will be much appreciated as not only X is suffering but also all public including children going to schools are affected by this road closure.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
ancester property-married woman share
I have already raised an query regarding rights of married woman-in the year of 1977 in Tamil nadu.for that i have got reply from Ramachandran sir- thanks for the same.
Now i have had the following queries on the same.
Grand father has 2 sons- one is my father who's elder(passed away in 1994) and yonger son is alive
1. House property partitioned as-
front portion to grandfather second son-
back portion to me(my father is elder son-who's passed away in 1994)
the property is registered- IN which the elder sister's who have got married in 1977- they have made their objection with register office- inspite of that we received our documents now.- My question is
1. Can we go for bank loan with the registered documents.?
2. According to partition back portion(vacant land) came to me- the signtors are
1. my grandfather second son,my 4 sisters(married after 1990) & my elder brother- will the process is right.
3. Earlier in grand father land is sold by us in which my elder brother has offered shares to my elder sisters(on that time we don't know the rights of woman's in ancester property)can it be recovered now?.
Kindly provide your advise sir