Master the Science Behind Firearm Evidence. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   27 June 2011 at 21:44

Phone tapping Guidelines SC required.

Which section says that law enforcement agencies can tap phones for security reasons more than 72 hours without the permission of union home secretary or principal secretary (home) of state? What do u mean by inspector general rank officer? As this officer can give orders to do so.

But if they don’t get a nod form the top on the fourth day, they will have to destroy the call records within 48 hours of getting the response form the authority. But which authority? Which section says that they have to destroy the records within 48 hours if they don’t get the nod? Nod means the permission or approval?

Pls elaborate it & i have heard that there is a SC guidelines for taking the permission & each everything till destroying the call records SC has given the guidelines so can i have the guidelines.

Thanks

wifebetrayed   27 June 2011 at 19:54

Mahilla cell power are limited

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/CAW-POWERS-are-LIMITED-29090.asp

Is below statement till hold true, can girl side refer case to women cell after divorce peiteion is filed by her in family court on cruelty and dowry charge

It is made clear that CAW Cell has no authority to secure the presence of any person either by coercion or by threat. CAW Cell is only a conciliatory body where efforts are made for conciliation with the free will of the parties. If any person is not willing to go to CAW Cell, he cannot be compelled. It is also directed that CAW Cell, in future, instead of issuing summons to the parties shall send request letters asking them to appear for the purpose of conciliation and not for the purpose of investigation. The petitioner is at liberty not to appear before CAW Cell.


Anonymous   27 June 2011 at 19:24

RTI and Consumer protection act

I am a practising lawyer. Please advice me about the exhaustive commentaries of good quality available on Right to Information Act and Consumer Protection

yogesh   27 June 2011 at 17:44

whether the employee cannot claim regularisation?

Eralier there was certain case state of haryana Vs Piara Singh, Workmeen case, Jaccob M Purumpathil case, etc etc which has stAted that

" If an employee has been working satisfactorily for fairly long spell, then the authorities must consider his case for regularisation provided that his service record is satisfactorily and his appointment doesn't counter to the reservation rules"

With the passing of latest case by Uma devi which has gone aginst the interest of employee and now cannot claim regularisation

Now my question is there are many hundred of employees who had been working for several years more than 10-15 years and all of them is now age barred.
If the employer wants to evict them they can discharged them at any stage . These employees had their families and children which are dependent exclusively on them where they will go?

Its not the fault of the employee only as the purpose of the adhoc employee is meant for the exigencies of the services which may be for some months to 1-2 year but once they had been retained in the services for more than 10 years. Don't think that there is fault on the employer too who has exploited the situation and let the employees to continue for several years and lastly evade up by saying that thei appointments were illegal

Kindly suggest the remedy for an employee?
whether approaching before supreme court by the way of writ petition will solve the riddle as lowe courts High , CAT will not listen to the grievances as precedent of the UMA DEVI is binding on them

Anonymous   27 June 2011 at 15:40

dohlidar status in haryana

i m a dohlidar in haryana please tell me right way to get full rights of land.
and what is the status of dohlidar bill passed by cheaf minister of haryana.
thanks

Anonymous   27 June 2011 at 12:59

Very Urgent need help

I have a shop taken on pagdi in a chawl since 1986 my landlord never did any repair work and also would not let us do any repair work and demanded money to give permission for carrying out repair work. We therefore stopped paying him the rent in protest and finally when the landlord verbally agreed to give me the permission to do the repair at my cost I paid him the rent till 2010. On his assurance I went ahead and gave the contract to the contractor and bought the construction material. When I started the work he came threatening me and demanded money to give permission. I went to police station to lodge a complaint but police officer was un cooperative and very rude to me after my landlord made the inspector speak to the bhai on phone,my landlord has strong links with the local Bhai and I am stuck as I have already paid to the contractor . Please help me.

shreya   26 June 2011 at 15:28

sANAD EXAMINATION

RESPECTED MEMBERS,
PLEASE INFORM ME ABOUT THIS EXAMINATION MATERIAL.HOW TO READ?WHICH MATERIAL I SHOULD PREFER?
THANKING YOU

Neville   26 June 2011 at 15:21

Cultivation rights information

I have a friend who is cultivating government land and has over 100 Banana trees , Fruit trees , Veg trees and no of other trees.

He has proof of stay on the land from 1986.

What is the procedure for formalizing his cultivation rights with the Collector's office / other department.

The land is in Mumbai.

Regards

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 15:14

Regarding Re-development of Society

Our Hsg. Society in Mumbai intends to go for re-development and are looking for some good Solicitor/Advocate based in Mumbai to protect our interest and will appreciate recommendations from friends on this site.

Alternatively if friends here are already an expert in re-development matters they can write directly giving brief information and quoting fees to

Hon. Secretary
Shantineer Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.,
George Nagar, J. B. Nagar,
Andheri (East), MUMBAI 400059.

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 15:04

The issue of Notice to Armed Forces Personnel serving in the Borders away from Homelands.

As per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 within 30 days of the Notification by the Government any person interested in the land can object to the Notification and file it in writing to the Collector

Has any amendment been made in the Land Acquisition Act 1894 TO SAFEGUARD THE INTERESTS OF THE PERSONNEL OF THE ARMED FORCES SERVING IN Border Areas where no communication reaches nor Notice about the Notification?

Can the Land of the Defence personnel serving in remote areas , who do not get to know about the Notice, nor able to file objections be returned to them under any Law/ Act?