S.S.RAM PRASATH
09 November 2012 at 17:20
Dear sir,
I joined the LL.B course and completed the same in this year 2012 june.Now same age restriction problem which became an obstacle to me for enrollment Tamil nadu bar council.
Tamil nadu bar council now not enrolling the 2009-2012 batch LL.B graduates(who are all above 35 years).The reason is 2009 the bar council of India send a circular(order) to all state bar councils and law colleges Regarding the age restriction.But same was challenged before hon`ble high court of andhra predesh. the High court stayed the order.Till now the stay is in force.The bar council of India filed a transfer petition in supreme court which pending before supreme court
govt of andhra pradesh order fallows
Age limits to applicants for seeking Admission vide G.O.Ms.No.32 dt : 18.03.09.
a) 5 - year Law Degree - Maximum age is twenty years in case of general category and twenty two years in case of SCs & STs.
b) 3 - year Law Degree - Maximum age is thirty years in case of general category and thirty five years in case of SCs & STs.
Note: Age limits mentioned above are under challenge in Hon’ble High court of A.P and Supreme Court in W.P.No.6691/09, 7610/09 and transfer petition (civil) nos 857-866 of 2009 in Supreme Court. Interim directions are awarded by the court relaxing the age limits. Admissions into the law courses shall be subject to the outcome of the pending cases.
The Tamil Nadu bar council reply is only state bar council will fallow the bar council of India. Only we will enroll if all India bar council permits.
Kindly advise me how can we make appeal to all india bar council in this regard.
Thanks&Best Regards,
chandra sekhar
09 November 2012 at 16:18
One of the Partner was contributed his immovable property as partnership property in the year 1975 and allotted 30% share. Later there is a Reconstitution in firm Three times and the said partner share become 4% in all Profit and Lossess and Immovable Properties of the firm. Finally the said partner was retired from the Partnership on 01-04-2012 and the Sub-Registrar was charged Stamp duty on Market Value of the Property of his 4% at the rated of 5 percent Stamp duty.
After Three Months the Audit people has issued a notice that the partner have contributed his property as partnership for his 30%, So you have pay the stamp duty on 30% of the M.Value of the property not on Relinquishment share of 4%.
Please clarify the same.
vijay
08 November 2012 at 17:01
Dear sir,
I want to know that under new rule of Delhi Vat a company required to inform their purchase to sales tax deptt. before selling that goods. if yes, please tell me the procedure for sending these information to department
Thanks
RAJESH
07 November 2012 at 17:43
Dear Sirs,
Sub : Wages of Sailing staff Officers onboard The Shipping Corpn Of India Ltd,. ships.
I am employed with The Shipping Corporation Of India Ltd. (The SCI LTD), Mumbai which is a Public Limited Company. My job involves sailing onboard the ships. The wages to all the Officers onboard including. is paid on the basis of Agreement settled between The MUI (Maritime Union Of India - on Officers behalf) & The INSA (Indian National Ship Owners' Association - On behalf of the Owners). Ideally these agreements are revised every two years. Since almost a decade this agreement is signed for uncertain periods but with the break up of wages for 2 years (i.e agreement for 4 years is signed once with two sets of wage schedules). Understand from Officers of Private sector shipping companies that their company pays more than the agreement wages to Top Four ranks of the Officers onboard. This system was not followed in The SCI even when the company was running short of Officers in their fleet. The scenario has changed since Jan'2008. Even The SCI is following private company tactics (Understand that this is done to stop their Officers leaving and joining lucrative offers of the private and foreing players and run the ship smoothly). Unfortunately The SCI is also paying only the select few Ranks, the higher wages by making them to come on contractual basis. Even though it is on contractual basis, the payment is very high, more than double of what these Ranks would have got if they had opted for agreement wages. Remaining ranks, which are not important (according to the safe manning document issued by The Directorate General Of Shipping), are not offered higher wages on contractual basis. Moreover these Ranks are at the risk of loosing their job if the Company decides to retrench them. This is what is mentioned in one of the clauses of the agreement, where in it has been agreed that the company can retrench any Officer it it feels his servce is in excess to the company. Though we Officers are permanently employed with The SCI from the beginning, they call us the bonafied employees of the The SCI and not permanent employees of The SCI in all the documents wherever ou status with the company is required to be mentioned.
My querries are:-
1) What is the difference between Bonafied Employee and Permanent employee?
2) Can a PSU like The SCI, Offer/pay higher contractual wages to select few Officers of its choice and pay others only the agreement wages?
3) If answer to 2nd querry is No.. then can we demand and claim higher wages and arrears of it from the day of implementation (Jan'2008).
4) Is the clause valid, which gives rights to the Owners to retrench its Officers by paying retrenchment allowance (since Owners only deciding on retrenchment and Union is agreeing and signing on the clause, one can imagine what will be the state of retrenchment allowance? IS THERE ANY GUIDELINE IN THIS REGARDS PLEASE?
5) Is there any guidelines for deciding BASIC wages of employees in the agreement between the Union and the Management? I am asking you this because there are certain Officer Ranks whose last BASIC (Around 30th year or so) does not equal to even first Basic (1st year Basic in higher Rank) of the higher Rank.
FYI SAFE MANNING DOCUMENT is certified and issued by The D.G.Shipping which states the minimum Officers and crew to be present onboard. Practically majority of ships carry more than the safe manning limits. I have tried to put forward the scenario to the best of my ability. Kind advice and guidance from your end would be highly appreciated. Many of the Officers onboard are unhappy with the step motherly treatment meeted out to them but are not raising their voice due to the fear of loosing their jobs.
Awaiting yours,
mas2000
05 November 2012 at 15:00
Sir,the said land in maharastra is transfer to the said farmer under section 32 M on Tillers day( 1st April 1957).The said farmer had transfers his name on property card under section 32 M and he has the said certificate. The land in question was agriculture land in 1957 but today the status of the said land is " Residential Zone "
Now I want to purchase the above said land.
# Whether I am eligible to purchase the said land ?
# Can the Collector stop us from purchasing the said land ?
# Willthe Collector ask for HEAVY NAZRANA ?
# Request to guide us.
Regards
drkambojrk
04 November 2012 at 22:14
Total land Shares 1116, of two kinds of land, 1.196 shares prime land and 2. 920 shares of cultivated land.Three groups of owners. A. GROUP A(family) owns 466 shares with a dwelling house in 98 shares and 368 shares of cultivated land rights in particular sp. Numbers. B. GROUP B with 160 shares include remaining 98 primeland shares 62 shares cultivated land. C. GROUP C owns remaining 490 shares of cultivated land with cultivating rights(Girdawri). Now one shareholder of GROUP C, buys 40 shares of primeland from a shareholder of GROUP B, making total 530 shares of Group C. Now GROUP A files an application for partition on the bases of possession. GROUP C files reply and demands partition on the OWNERS SHARE base and also demands share of the Primeland and dwelling house, though he is a stranger.GROUP B already having the possession of primeland doesn't respond to notice from the court. What should be the mode of partition as per the latest law ?
RAJ KUMAR TOSHNIWAL
03 November 2012 at 09:18
My client is owner of a commercial mall and charging electricity charges from the tenants as per the submeter installed at their shops at the rate exceeding actual tariff charged by power supply company.Tenancy agreement has a clause of seperate electric charges to paid by tenant at the rates fixed by the owner from time to time as per the submeter reading.For electricity charges seperate debit note is issued apart from service tax invoice towards rent.
Kindly enlighten whether landlord has to charge service tax on electricity charges and whether tenant is liable for tds on this.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Khata
In 30x40 site father has selled the 750 Sq Ft ( 3 Portion :-Ground,1st & 2nd Floor) in the year 1996,but the parti who has taken khata bifurcation ( Whole property khata is in the name of father & tax paid till 2013 )
Now the Party who has taken the property has come & asks the sign to the FORM for khata bifurcation, father has signed also...
Now the problem is when the time to registration in 1996 in the register copy there is mentioned only Ground & 1st Floor,2nd floor is not mentioned due to this the BBMP case worker is telling to the party that he cant able to do the khata bifurcation.
Now the party is asking to my father for re- registration with mentioning the 2nd floor also..
Pls Help Me on this:-
1)Can we ask the 2nd floor portion to give us back ( Since its not mentioned in the registration )
2)If we do re- registration is that my sign is require ( When the time of selling in 1996 my father & mother has signed in copy & now my mother in no more AND now am 28 years and i was minor in 1996)
3) After khata bifurcation can we sell the property which in under our ownership without any problem