Sir/Madam
I was working as a Factory Manager, but the factory is closed now and as a result i left the job. During my tenure, a fire occurred in a factory but by the grace of God no one hurts in the Fire but there was loss to the equipment only. The Deputy Director of Factories filed a case in CJM's Court in the year 2010, since then the said case is pending, The company is now in bifer and closed. As per factories Act there is a provision for punishment to the extent of two years and fine ranging from Rs. 50/- to One Lac levied upon Factory Manager, but it will depend on the mood of the judge. My question are as under :-
Q-1. The fire took place in the factory in the year 2010, the Dy. Dir. of factories filed the case at Patiala in the year 2010, the District Changed in the year 2011, to Mohali, is there any provision under law to shift the case to new Distt. since it is near to my house ?
Q-2 The complainant has not appeared in the Court on single occasion, whereas i am regularly appearing for the last three years, is there any provision under law to appraise the judge about the same so that the case can be dismissed on account of "dismissed as default" ?
Q-3 How Can i convince the judge that I am suffering for the last three years, as I am visiting the court on every date on my own and incurring expenses from my own pocket every time and if tomorrow the judge decide the case and imposed fine say Rs. 1 Lac, I will not able to pay the same, how can i convince him to impose fine Rs. 500-1000/- only ?
arindam
19 September 2013 at 14:42
By an ARPANNAMA Near about 45 acres of land ( some were cultivation land , ponds, bastuvita) were registered in 1907 in the subregistry office of kotalpur in Bankura District of west bengal.This ARPANNAMA was created for the four deites established by a devotee .The income genereated from this property was totally used for the expeneses for the deites throughtour the year. But suddenly some of the family member of that family make an application to BLLRO officer of Kotalpur in Bankura District and then BLLRO served a notice some of the family members of the family that this total property is under inspection ,and a hearing will be held at his office to examine whether it is public in nature or private in nature.
But unfortunately due to no avavilabilty ofsuch notice many family members were not present at that hearing.But after that meeting BLLRO office does not serve any order copy of that such hearing to till date now. When we apply to the present BLLRO of Kotalpur under rti act 2005 to know which basis this change of recods of rights was heppend in 1995 ,he answered he does not find any document related to this notice and hearing.
But when we give application for searching copy of some plots to the Bllro and get the present status of recod of rights...we are just surprised that total property we distributed within all the family members in various portion.
My question is any government official in west bengal land reforms department and Revenue department to cancel the Registered Deed and distribute the lands in various persons according to his wish, also recoded in ROR ..
Dnyan
18 September 2013 at 21:27
hamare pados k farmer ne uska land (Gat) maap liya or humare land ,jiska gat alag he usme atikraman bataya he .lekin ye bat hume manjur nahi he to iske liye kya kiya ja sakta he .
Dnyan
18 September 2013 at 21:21
humari total jamin jo 1 hectre 71 guntha he. lekin 7/12 me kheti layak jamin 1 hectre 52 he aur put krab (A) 19 gunthas he .par niche total me 1hectre 71 k bajay 1 hectre 54 hi dikaya jaata he.to kya 7 /12 galat he ya put kharab total main kam hi lete hain?
Law of equility
I need comments from the experts on my following Legal points:-
We need to file a Comprehensive Writ Petition on some very important legal issues and points, relating to eradication of Corruption:-
1. Under the law of equality the Petitioner being admitted Tax Evasion Petitioner is fully entitled to get Amount of Reward plus interests for delay in payment against realization of Revenue on his Tax Evasion Petitioner, under the Reward Policy formulated by the CBDT.
2. Under the Law of Justice, the petitioner is fully entitled to get all information regarding each enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities, on the basis of complaints lodged by the Petitioner.
3. In the larger Public Interests, the petitioner is fully entitled to get all information regarding each Survey or Enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities.
4. Under the law of equity, Central Vigilance Commission, is responsible to issue direction upon the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct investigations when petitioner can justify that the enquiry conducted by the Income Tax (Investigation) and Income Tax (Vigilance) authorities, was not genuine rather under collusion.
5. That under the law of equality and equity, disclosure of Information protected under the right of privacy, including Income Tax Returns and details attached with them, cannot be denied when petitioner has satisfied with the documentary evidences that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information outweighs the harm to the protected interests.
6. Working of Income Tax Department, under supervision and direction and control of the CBDT, is not in conformity with their duties, rather to protect black money of Big Tax Evader.
7. Working of CVC, as if it’s working is as Corruption Validation Commission.
8. CIC is not functioning fair in most of cases filed by me related to CBDT or IT Deptt.
9. Shri Rajiv Mathur, the present IC has passed orders in the strong biased manner and further ignoring that every complaint is right to know full details of the results of enquiry conducted on his complaint.
PARTIES to be in Writ Petition:-
CVC;
CBDT;
CIC;
Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata
Directorate of Income Tax (Vigilance), Delhi
Shri Rajiv Mathur, IC of CIC;
CIT-Kol-1 for self and also for other subordinates in IT Deptt., in Kolkata
Private Third Parties, if necessary.