J SHANMUGAM
01 September 2015 at 15:07
sir,
matter related to IGR circular 67 issued in 2011, which deals with fradulant regn.
Madras High Court has issued stay order in 2012
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has issued stay order in 2012
in 2014 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dispossed the WP in favour of IGR circular 67
still Madras High Court stay order still active
enclosed copy of all court order
in the mean time i got a direction in Madurai bench of Madras High Court to complete enquiry and issue order according to IGR circular 67, but regn dept not acting to it, when a rti filled the reply i got from there is stay order in Madras High Court
guide me in this stage
gaurishanker
31 August 2015 at 10:29
I want valuable opinions of my friends on following three counts:
(1)Whether panch witnesses of a search carried out by CBI can asked questions during the course of search to the persons present on the spot of search.I am of the opinion that panchas are there only to hear and see the proceedings and as soon as they start questioning they loose their identity as panch and become a police officer.I have follwing two citations which are too old and I want a fresh judgement on this count:
(i)Naginlal Nandlal Vs State of Gujarat1961(2)Gujatat LR 664,(ii)Omarji Vs State AIR1963Guj 145,1963(2)CrLJ14
(2)I am of the opinion that when the place of purposed search is a public place and there are so many persons who can be called for being a panch witness the CBIshould have called these persons instead of managing government officers of various department a day before the search.Panch must be from the local locality.
(3)The sanctioning authority for prosecution under The P C Act,1988 have no authority to revised its earlier sanction order without assigning any valid reason.
MUNISH GARG
29 August 2015 at 21:45
I was working in Autonomous body of punjab Govt from last 3 yrs. Now i hv joined Punjab Govt Depptt Food & Civil Supply through Direct Open recruitment by applying through Proper Channel, i hv given Technical resignation & also marked a lien. Now question arises whether my pay ll be protected or not. Bcz now punjab govt is paying only basic pay to every new employee which is only 10300 for 2 years. I was taking 34000 on previous job. Plz also tell CSR regarding pay protection n punjab high court judgements supporting ur views.
kumar
26 August 2015 at 09:41
I have booked property 3 months ago its ready position new flat and done agreement registered I have done yet the payment of one lack by check and put the file for loan but now builder sent me letter that I have to pay the bal amount in 15 days with the interest of 1 lack the bal amount is 23 lack now what I can do please help im not in the position to pay im helpless the bank is saying 1 more month and builder did not said anything about interest at the time of booking that if loan from bank takes time now suddenly I have got this letter is this is legal cause the property was ready position at the time of booking is there no law for the person who is going to take loan he will not get time for loan approvals please help
Soumick Basak
25 August 2015 at 16:15
Hi Xperts
My query is :
a CMMI Level 5 IT company takes interviews multiple times and after clearing the same they collect documents from the candidate and there is no response after that.
Can we lodge a complaint against the employer pointing that a Harassment of the Candidates
Ravish
25 August 2015 at 02:19
Sir /mdm
2010 mai hamne (party A ) se ptaa liya lekin uska termin(registration) Machlisher Tehsil (UP) nhi ho paya kyoke hamre neighbour(party B) ne lekhpal aur setting krke patta cancel krake usko gamsabha kra diya aur party A nd Party B sb ka ptaa cancel hoke gamsabha hogye 1972 mai party A ka ptta tha jisse hmne 2010 mai liya phir 1982 mai Party B ka ptta huva tha aur phir 1985 mai party A ka ptta ho gya aur 2010 tk party A ka ptta tha jb hmne unse kharida lekin abhi pta chla ke party B ne koi setting krke lekhpal se mil ke waps ptaa kra liya hai jo jameen gamsabha ho gye the kya koi gamsabha ke jameen waps ptta kra sakta hai aur kaise kyoke gampradahan ne koi bhe application ya sign nhi diya tha gamsabha ko ptaa krane ke liye tehsil mai iske proof mile hai ke Party B ne jo purane ptte ke paper the jo cancael ho gye the tehsil mai setting krke aur computer editing technolegy ka uska istamal krke farzi trike se sari gamabha ptta kra liya hai aur sabhi jgh ptravali aur khtana (khatoni) pr bhe ptta kr ke sb jgh ptta kra diya hai ab aise mai hume kya krna chahiye ye farziwade ke liye aur kya koi gamsabha ke jameen ptaa waps kr sakta hai agr yea to kaise kon se rule se apke help aur suggeation chahiye
shrikantvelekar
22 August 2015 at 10:30
My grand father did POA in 1977 with the builder and builder registered that POA as a deed of confirmation in 2001.But in 2001 my grand father was not exist.He was died in 1998,his wife and son was died before his demises.Is this deed of confirmation valid?from 1977 to 2015 property cards shows my grand father name.Is the builder have right to develop plot or we have still claim on it. Please advice.
Dr. Rajkumar Hari Pol
21 August 2015 at 07:44
In so many cases Hon'ble SC & HCs are given judgments that the remedy u/s.6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 is summary remedy, then what procedure is applicable for its trial in Maharashtra? Whether summary procedure or regular?
KETAN J SHAH
20 August 2015 at 11:31
Respected Sir's
I am a Landlord of a property in Mumbai. I have filed a case in small cause court against my tenant and simultanouesly Tenant has filed suit against corporation for the same matter which is in small cause court.In both the cases the tenant has given false evidence in his written statements and Plaints. He has not given true statement to his advocates also and that is why the advocates have filed statements on the Tenants words.
Secondly the original tenant is still alive and he has added his sons name in the premises.In the court Tenant says it is his properitory concern and in actual he has added his sons name without the permission of the Landlord. As far as I understand the law it is clear that the son's right comes over the property only after the original tenant expires.The tenant is a commercial Tenant and after his death the son should be in the same profession as his father.
What are the rights of a brother in a brothers property.
Please clarify the above queries and oblige
Thanking you in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can findings in an anticipatory bail be used for grounds in a discharge petition
Sir in 498a case discharge petition, my lawer used the finding of the sessions judge in his anticipatory bail order that " as per the complaint and documents refereed there are no specific allegations as per theses petitioners so i inclined to grant Anticipatory bail" all the material part of investigation was completed as per the records hence i grant bail,
the sessions judge who rejected the revision in discharge petition has commented seriously that the order in the anticipatory bail was misconcieved by these petitioners,
is there any judgements in favour of the findings in an anticipatory bail can be looked in the trail