Akhil
03 December 2014 at 22:38
Hello Sir,
My father is a government high school head master. My uncle's wife who is an illiterate women, has faked a sign in some property document.The opposite party has filed a forgery case against her. I completely support their move against her.
Now the problem is they have included my dad's name in the FIR as my dad is a govt employee and will be affected the most in the case. My dad doesn't know anything about the fake sign nor did he support anything like that. But now he is trapped in this case and they are demanding 5 lakhs rupees from him.
Now my dad is facing arrest warrant. He is very innocent and humble person who fears all these things and is waiting for bail.Please help us. He is fully depressed.
will my dad get suspended if he is arrested before he gets bail.
can we file a case against the opposite party for filing fake fir against my dad and mentally harassing him.
please help me out.
nitish panghal
03 December 2014 at 22:27
hello sir,
we lend 10 lac rupees by cheque to a family friend before 4 years ago. now he do not pay back the money. we do not have any written agreement.
we have only cheque photo copy as a evidence.
any legal advice how can we recover our money
John Ruban
03 December 2014 at 21:05
The Hindu Joint family members ABC respectively as brothers. A got three famale child. B got one male child as X. C got 2 male child. All are hindu joint family members. In the year of 1985 A was died without got 3 female daughter and his wife. That time Hindu family members discussed and oraly with choosed X is a cremated only A's funerial function as a adopted son ( At the time X is Major). No documents created such adoption. In the year of 1986 B is dead. Subsequently all are arranged family partition with registered deed. If the deed made as noted X is a adopted son of A. A legal heirs of wife and 3 daughters and adopted son (X) were equal share of A's Share and A's legal heirs made release deed to give share themselves to X. So X is take possession A's share and B shares. Now all the documents are show in the name of X. Now issues arising X is not sale of becomes partition property. Issues is X is a A's adopted son but not B's son. so X is cannot entitled to claim B's total share. Despite X claimed entitle B's one share. Other share is to go C. The issues are right or wrong. kindly anybody clarify the issue and if the judgment is available as Adopted son to claim over the biological father property.
Anil
03 December 2014 at 20:23
Respected All
A property which is jointly owned or a property which is jointly registered. can a will be made by one of the holder to it kins?
thank you
nizam shaikh
03 December 2014 at 19:50
Sir my sister married finsih almost 1year but not even one month passed they started tourchering my sis and beating her and asking for dowry and now they are not taking her back to home and she have a small baby..
I am from mumbai i need a lawyer.
surendrababu
03 December 2014 at 19:35
Sir,
I have taken a building for a monthly rent of Rs.50/- per Sq. ft (Total Monthly Rent of Rs. 40,000), the owner of the building demanding me to pay service tax on rent amount. please clarify me whether I should pay the service tax to the owner of the building besides rent?
preoshi
03 December 2014 at 19:34
Sir I have done bca from ignou in 2003 and bsc hons from Ranchi university in 2004 ,is it valid? Some says yes some says no. Is there any filed rti regarding this issue?
Rupendra Porwal
03 December 2014 at 18:34
Friends,
We submitted copies of evidences on affidavit in the suit. The judge has dismissed the suit citing that as per section 3 of Evidence Act, the affidavit can not be treated as an evidence and any document submitted with affidavit can also not be treated as evidence.
1. How one should submit evidences in civil suit and what are the relevant provisions?
2. Would it be better to submit evidence on memo under Order 13 Rule 1?
3. How should one submit clarifications/submissions on certain documents like secondary evidences or electronic records like emails or web pages?
sachin sethi
03 December 2014 at 18:30
In an interesting case under section 292/384 IPC a lawyer after 5 days of appearing on behalf of defense was cited as a witness of recovery of some articles by the prosecution and later on examined as a witness in the case on behalf of prosecution.......now though not ordered so far by the court yet the prosecution wants the defense counsel to relinquish his vakalatnama at the stage of final arguments by way of filing an application......
Now my queries are:-
1. Whether the application of prosecution is hit by section 303 cr.p.c. and article 22 (1) of the constitution denying the accused to have a lawyer of his choice when he wants to continue with same lawyer.....
2. Whether in such a situation it will amount to professional miscoduct on the part of defense counsel, (especially when he has deposed truly in the evidence) to continue with the case......
3. I have a citation reported in AIR KERALA 1989 Pg. 244 on this aspect that it is neither the professional misconduct nor does the lawyer need to relinquish his vakalatnama......please quote any other rulling specifically on the same point........
Thanks.....
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compromise failed
hello all learned,
That i have lodged the complain under the provision of negotiable instrument act against accused. After the cross examination of the complainant compromise taken place on record and accused given another cheque for the compromise and the compromise declared by way of written paper and zerox of cheque which was given for the compromise.
Then after the cheque which was given for the compromise also returned having remarks “insufficient fund ”.
Now can i declare this matter with the certified copy before the court to declare that the cheque of compromise has been dishonoured as documentary evidence ?
Can i take examination of chief of bank officer when he comes to give her testimony ?
Please guide.
Regards