yagnesh dave
07 April 2015 at 13:17
I HAVE FILED SERVICE TAX RETURN FOR PERIOD APR TO SEP 14 FOR RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX CALCULATED TAX ON 25% OR 3.09% OF TOTAL VALUE AND SELECTED NOTIFICATION 26/2012 AND SERIAL 1 IN SERVICE TAX RETURN BUT NOW WHEN I VIEW MY ST3 RETURN IT SHOWED ERROR THAT 26/2012 NOTITFCATION AND SERIAL 1 IS NOT APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX SERVICE. MY QUESTION IS THAT WHAT IS THE CORRECT NOTIFCTION AND SERIAL NO FOR RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX SERVICE FOR ABOVE 3.09% CALCULATION AND WHETHER MY CALCULATION IS CORRECT OR NOT
Read more at: http://www.caclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
praveen
07 April 2015 at 13:07
Hi,
In January 2014 when my Company HR called me on mobile to know if I am interested in H1b and I said yes.
I have sent my scanned copy of education documents upon request. Later I signed visa checklist document.This document has following point...
"You will sign the Service Agreement in advance on being advised by MATC/HR. This agreement is to ensure that the candidate will pay Company Rs. 2.8L towards the cost
of processing H-1B visa should he/she fail to take up US assignment after visa stamping"
Company said my H1b petition was filed on April 1.On April 20, I sent couple of emails asking them to withdraw my candidature for H1b,as I am not interested in onsite opportunities
due to family constraints. HR asked me to sign the secondment agreement and submit it earliest.Even after telling them that I am no longer interested in H1b, Still they insisted that I sign the document and assured verbally that there will not be any legal consequences of it. But I dint sign the document .
I submitted my resignation on May 7th stating that due to my family constraints I have to quit the company and had no qualms with the Company. Though the reason for quitting company is odd timings(weekend work) and no growth in pay.
HR Admin told, my petition was picked in lottery (sometime after April 20), and I have to bear all the expenses for h1b processing fee.ie 4000$(2.5 Lakh Rupees) if i Quit. Asked me to pay entire amount and get relieved properly. They didnot cancel my petition after my resignation.I spoke to HR Admin several times to reduce the payment and shown me my H1b receipt number for proof. All my requests were futile. Neither I received my receipt number nor I attended visa interview but I had to pay 2.8 lakh Rupees after 2 months from relieving date(Aug 5th).I paid this money as I needed relieving letter to join another company.
I have proofs of the following documents:
1.visa checklist document.(which says, "You will sign the service agreement...)
2. My Email letter asking to cancel my h1 petition dated April 20.
3. Acknowledgement for Visa fee payment for 2.4 lakh Rupees.
Is there any chance of filing case against the company for not providing my receipt number after paying the complete visa fee. earlier company did not cancel my visa petition when I spoke to them number of times to cancel my petition in April month itself when there is a scope for cancellation.That would have charged me with less amount around 60000 Rupees instead of 2.5 Lakh Rupees.
Please suggest me what are my chances for filing case against my company. I am eagerly waiting for your kind advice. Thanks in advance for your time.
prakash
07 April 2015 at 12:16
Sir,
I have signed the annexure h as part of minor daughter and she is in the custody of my ex- wife and she is an applicant to my daughter.
As per the family court order she is the custodian, and I have not taken any visiting rights.
Since I have signed the annexure h, will it has any problem relating to legal issues at a latter stage.
sant
07 April 2015 at 11:52
if any of accused partner could not attend one of the 5/6 date/hearing given by local court.rest partner r attending wat will be the consequencs
varma
07 April 2015 at 11:31
Sir, I have filed in lowercourt regarding Title declaration & delivery of possession on 1 acre land on my paternal uncle in year 1986.But lower court dismissed my case in year2000.In year 2000,I prefer appeal in Highcourt.During pendency of appeal,I have filed temporary Injuction on 1 acre land against my paternal uncle and same is granted(Status quo) and high cout also made Status quo absolute after contesting of my paternal uncle on year2000.During pendency of this appeal,my uncle on year2004 he again sold 1 acre land to 10 members and we have made these 10 members also parties and court has granted Status quo also.In year 2014,again parcel part of subject property is aliegnated to 2 members.This time,I again implead these 2 members and court notice also served.These 2 members also kept lawyer and my main suit is pending in high court. one member out of these two,started house construction stating that on his name status Quo is not granted by High court.He also filed in lower court praying temparary injuction aginst me not to interfere to stop his building working activities and permanent injuction against me not to disturb his occupation of his house.
1)Sir,plz tell whether lower court has juridiction to allow this suit and to to conduct the proceedings which the lower court suit proprty is same subject matter of parcel and part of High court appealsuit property between same parties 2)can lower court give any orders when same subject matter between same parties is already pending as appeal in high court.
3)please tell what section, i can dismiss the case at entry level in loer court
Rajesh
07 April 2015 at 11:11
Hello All,
We have lodges a complaint against a person for sending sms and calling a women, the police registered a case u/s 354D and grant him bail right away.
but the person is continuously sending the sms and calls. We approached the court with the request that please book him under non-bailable as this is second offense. now the lawyer of opposite party says the 354D becomes non-bailable only after conviction in first case.
Query : what is the best remedy in law available with women to save herself from such sms and phone calls.
2. is 354 D would not become non-bailable at second offence when the first one is still under trial only.
thanks in advance for your support .
nandanm
07 April 2015 at 08:53
Hi Experts,
I have a pending 66A on me, without any other IPC sections. In all probability the case will be nullified because of the repeal.
The trial phase was over. Only the final argument from my side was pending when 66A was repealed. So far, our side has been incredibly strong, as the prosecution has totally messed up their part, primarily because they didnt have any evidence, their only witnesses were the police IO and DCP. Both the witnesses stated that they have not done the investigation and pointed at each other. Moreover, in the chargesheet they mentioned a hard drive , supposedly seiged from me, which is a complete lie, and they could neither reproduce the HD nor could tell when it was seiged , and by whom. Basically, the whole prosecution reeks of malice.
However, now that I was at the fag end of the proceedings, about to win the case, 66A has been repealed.
Can I still file for damages, and malicious prosecution ?
thanks
Nandan
kamal krishan
07 April 2015 at 07:54
Sir ,
It is experienced that cheque bounce cases are not being adjucated by the courts under sec 147 , . inspite of complaining under this sec . Kindly share ur viewes on this expect.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can trustee accept rent for his building given to trust
dear experts,
One of my friend is running a school by forming a trust.One of the trustee is his father. the school building is in the name of his father. Now can he give rent to his father as his father is trustee and landlord both.