amit kumar
13 August 2016 at 02:29
A 24 year unmarried young commit suicide in his home without leaving any suicide note, in the absence of his parents.when parents reach home they called police.police send dead body for postmortem after completing all necessary formalities. after 24 days parents gave a request letter to SHO of concerned police station for further investigation but police did not conduct any investigation.police not providing copy of FIR to parents of this matter :please suggest legal remedy.thanks
Parakh
13 August 2016 at 01:24
i had withdrawn a case filed by me on a medicine online company from consumer forum with a reason in withdrawn application that" i have been permanently shifted to other state and as a financial issue i am unable to attend case dates as i am unemployed"
is their any risk or chance that the opposite party may file a case against me in a civil court against this matter in any circumstances ???
(i truly speaking that my case have all proof against them and i was cheated. )
RAVI SRIVASTAVA
13 August 2016 at 00:43
If any two person open Bank or Mutual fund Account with Either or survivor mode then it is possible to change basic information of account as- address/bank account details etc. by single account holder of Bank.
RAVI SRIVASTAVA
13 August 2016 at 00:41
If any two person open Bank or Mutual fund Account with Either or survivor mode then it is possible to change basic information of account as- address/bank account details etc. by single account holder of Bank.
rama gopalkrishnan
13 August 2016 at 00:13
The above section says that members who do not pay maintenance, the Sociery can take the help of Registrar by paying him Rs. 1000/- fees and take action against members to collect the pending dues.
There are some flats in our Society where the owners are not given any membership. The Society has issued notice to them under the above section and are threatening these owners.
Does this section 101 apply to non-members also? How should these non-members fight?
Please help.
Anonymous
12 August 2016 at 23:41
We r 5 brothers. I and my elder brother where working together in a shop but the shop was in the name of my elder brother. During that time my elder brother bought a piece of land on his name.So my question is can i claim my right on that land?if yes then what proof do i need to bring out.
CHARAN SINGH
12 August 2016 at 23:18
A case of judicial separation was filed by a husband since husband and wife were living separately for last fourteen years. Wife filed F.I.R. under section 498A, 406, 34 I.P.C. in which eight out of total 9 accused were discharged by the court. During cross-examination with the wife in the judicial separation case. The judge started writing cross examination at 1:15 P.M. and repeatedly requested the husband to close the cross-examination with the wife at 1:40 P.M. On his request, the husband said ok assuming that the cross-examination will be deferred for the next date.
But on the next date, husband came to know that the cross examination was closed by the judge arbitrarily at the last date. Husband gave application for cross examination which was disallowed by the judge and a cost of Rs. 1,000/- was put on the husband stating that you are trying to delay the case and the case was fixed for final arguments.
Husband was not ready for this, then in the open court, the judge said to the husband that you are living separately for the last fourteen years and I will allow judicial separation on this ground in my judgement. You should not waste your time in bringing more evidences. Then the husband did not object to it and the judge gave judgement dismissing the case with cost on the husband.
Now the husband is feeling cheated by the judge. Is any action allowed in the law against the judge?
Rahul sahu
12 August 2016 at 23:14
if a property covered 143 then dakhil kharij requirement is not necessary
Ram
12 August 2016 at 21:36
Hello Sir,
MY father and my uncle (his real brother) both have 50% share in a property. Now my uncle wants to sell his 50% share to third party known to us and my father wants to gift his 50% share to his son that is me.
My father and my uncle both are 80years and are not able to go to the registrar office, so we have to call the registrar home.
We are confused if my father who is the first owner becomes the confirming party and on the same day if he makes a gift deed then who will be the confirming party as my uncle would have already sold his rights to third party.
Kindly suggest.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Personal loan debt 10 years old and sold to third party
I had availed a personal loan from ABN AMRO bank around 10 years back and paid some EMI but then was unable to pay, gradually the bank was taken over by ROyal Bank of Scotland and now in 2012 the debt was sold to Phoenix ARC a kotak mahindra bank venture, now the goons are persuading me for the recovery of amount of around 2.25 lakhs including cheque bounce and late payment charges. The collection agents and agency is belonging to Rabari and they never have any ID Cards. Do I stand liable to pay this debt or does it come under time barred debt?