Member (Account Deleted)
03 October 2016 at 18:02
My cheque was stoped by the bearer, can i lodge an FIR for the sames. OR what legal action van i take for the same matter.
Shekhar Puri
03 October 2016 at 16:57
> My wife is having affair with married man
>The man often visits her in her rented flat
>What should I do:
*Can I inform & file FIR in the local Police station when the man is in her Flat
* Is the Police bound by law to take the FIR under section 497
*Should I advice them to conduct medical test on my wife & the man when they are caught in the flat
* Should I dial police cntrol no 100 & inform them to come to the place where the man is with my wife
* Or it it better to go to local police station & then inform them which I feel they may refuse to take my complaint.
Please advise point by point on the above queris please
akumar
03 October 2016 at 16:19
What is the meaning of police B report on FIR.
rgds,
Anuj
Senthilkumar
03 October 2016 at 16:16
If a person having unsettled loans, then his son is eligible for settling the loan or not???
If his son is eligible, then the sons wife is also responsible for the loan or not???
sushilagrawal
03 October 2016 at 15:52
I have a Copy of F.I.R U/s 323,504 dt 19/10/15 IPC,Medial is also done by polie but nothing has been done yet ,suggest what to do,what about Charge sheet
jayantha
03 October 2016 at 15:37
My fathers sister expired long back about 30 years ago but now her children filed a suit on my fathers property,my fathers property mutated in my mother name,because my father expired in 1990. My father got his share in year 1968 and share paper is registered
1)will they get property in my fathers share?
2)will 2005 amendment help us to win this case?
Bony
03 October 2016 at 14:50
As a token amount i gave 100000 to the owner of property by agreeing that the title and the permission of the property is clear and then we have apply for loan and the lawyer of the bank said the property permission is rejected by corporation then after so loan can't sanction on this property so now we have canceled the deal beachase of that reason so are we suppose to reimburse whole amount from that owner-?
Regards,
Bony otawani
sameer
03 October 2016 at 14:48
1.Flat is in father and mother joint name. There are three childrens to them all are married . They also have minor childs. After father death. Three children wants a flat is in mothers name. Is NOC required from all three Childrens sufficient for that or NOC of their spouse and minor childrens also required for the same.
2. Can one children relinquish his right in the fathers property at his will ? In that case any one consent required for his relinquishment of right?
Venkedesh
03 October 2016 at 14:31
Dear sir, Sir, I am trying to redeem my father's property from the clutches of land grabbers, for the past 30 years. This is the last chance given by god. 1. I am the Respondent / Judgement debtor in a title suit. The suit was decreed against me in the year 1987. Agreed over the judgment and decree I filed a second appeal before the Madras high court, which was dismissed on 13.08.2002 to my dismay. 2. The decree holder along with his 4 legal heirs sold the suit property on 27.07.2000, lis pendency of the second appeal. Simultaneously, on the same date & time (i.e., on 27.07.2000) the D,Hr. and his 4 sons executed a power deed in favor of the purchaser of the above suit property. The D.Hr. without disclosing the above material facts to the court filed an Execution Petition on 20.03.2003. On that day, the D.Hr. has no interest in the property as it has been already sold. 3. Please note Sir, the purchaser of the suit property without disclosing either his purchase or execution of a power deed in his favour, filed an EA in the year 2003, praying to allow him to pursue the EP proceedings on behalf of the decree holder by a Special Power of Attorney. The court had allowed him to continue the EP proceedings as a Special Power of Attorney. 4. On 26-12-2015, the decree holder died. Without disclosing the death of the decree holder, the Power agent obtained order from the court to take delivery of the property during March, 2016. 5. On 8-4-2016, the Judgment debtor filed a memo before the court informing about the death of the decree holder. It was left to the J.Ds. to bring to the notice of the court that the decree holder is dead. 6. Sensing the seriousness, now the purchaser/power agent filed petition under Order III Rule 1 & 2 of CPC r/w section 151 of CPC to permit the power of attorney to continue the EP proceedings as legal representatives of the deceased decree holder, by virtue of the Power Deed executed on 27.07.2000. And he filed one more petition under Order 21 Rule 16 of the CPC to permit the power agent to pursue the EP filed by the deceased decree holder as a transferee of tile by operation of law, by virtue of the sale deed executed on 27.07.2000. Both of the above said Power deed and Sale deed have not seen light of the day for the past 17 years. 7. Now, we want clarification on the following points, Sir: (1) Whether the legal heirs of the deceased decree holder can execute the decree even now as the deceased decree holder and his legal heirs already sold the property to third party i.e., the present power agent before seventeen years? (1) Does the power alleged have been given by the deceased decree holder and his four sons on 27.07.2000 empower the petitioner/ Special power agent to seek recognition even now? (2) Does the alleged Sale deed said to be executed by the deceased decree holder and his four sons on 27.07.2000; even after seventeen years empower the purchaser/power agent to continue the EP proceedings as a transferee of title by operation of Law? . Hence, I earnestly solicit your kind legal advice in this matter Sir.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mrtp act- pls urgent reply
Dear All,
My query is related with MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL AND TOWN PLANNING ACT 1966.
One Land propery say X property jointly owned by A & B (Purchased in 1940)share ratio 1/2:1/2 and orally partition done between A & B in the said property. A has 3 legal heirs say P,Q & R and B has 3 legal heirs say S,T & U. P,Q& R have done partition in their comman share and built up residential consutruction in thier respective area without taking permission of S,T & U. But when Mr.S made residential construction by taking permission of T & U, PQ&R had taken thier objection and filed complaint with Muncipality and municipality raised notice under MRTP ACT and case is pending.
when S received Notice he also filed complaint against PQR with municipality and PQ&R got notice under MRTP from Municipality case pending in court
After that Mr. T had started Res.Construction after taking permission from S & U again PQR filed complaint and Mr. T has got notice under MRTP Act.
Now my complaint is: after filing of complaint by Mr.T against PQR with municipality can municipality raise notice under MRTP ACT to PQR???
Kindly reply your valuable suggestion.