Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ravichandra   13 January 2017 at 07:19

Legal check for purchasing. house

Hi Experts,

I need your help in checking all legalities in purchasing a house. 2 properties came for sale in my native place.


1)First one, this house is purchased by the party in July 1996. Its a registered document. But they don’t have link documents etc from whom they have purchased. Now they want to sell. And also the exact party who purchased this house in 1996 is no more. His daughters 3 in number want to sell it now with the help of legal heir certificate and death certificate.

A)Can I go ahead even though they don’t have link documents before 1996 july ?
B)an I purchase this house based on the documents provided by parties daughter(selling
fathers house based on legal heir certificate and death certificate. THEY DONT HAVE
REGISTERED WILL )


2)Second one, This property is purchased by a old gentleman in 1957 year. Document is available. He gave this house to his 2 sons through a registered will. Now sons want to sell and old person who purchased is no more.

A)Can I purchase this house safely ? How to make sure that Old peson who initially purchased the house has written only ONE REGISTERED WILL (because REGISTERED WILL wont be coming in online ENCUMBERANCE CERTIFICATE)
B)How to make sure that no other legal heirs are there other than the 2 sons.

I humbly request you to Please suggest me on above 4 points individually.

I don’t want to give advance now with out checking legal formalities. Last time I lost my advance amount when I tried to purchase but deal not successful.
Please tell me which of the above houses is more safe for me legally.


Anonymous   13 January 2017 at 01:51

Grandfather property rights to grand daughter

I am Grand daughter, My grand father wrote a will that the property will be given to my grand children. By the time he wrote the Will we haven't born. Recently my brothers planning to sell the property without consulting me. I am a grand daughter do u have the same rights?

Ankur   13 January 2017 at 01:02

Sample response to false allegatios dv and 125

As many of users reporting the attachment is missing and I cannot attach the one in this, I have pasted the contents in plain text in below replies. Please have a look.

Hi,

I have attached the false allegations made. Can you please guide me / provide me sample response that I can use to fight all false cases filed on me.

Regards,
Ankur

Nipun Arora   13 January 2017 at 00:09

Witholding information

I was working with a company for last few months, During this tenure they deducted my EPF and deposited the same. However, I am not having my salary sheets with me. They were neither emailed to me nor informed about. Although I could have retrieved them from their software when I was in service. Now, they are not providing me my UAN number or my PF number nor replying to my email requests. Is it possible to take any legal action?

Pradeep   12 January 2017 at 21:53

Decided case law book on agricultural loan waiver

Dear all,

Please suggest me to buy decided case law book on agricultural loan waiver (From 2008 to till)

Hence i request you to pls suggest good book on decided case law of Agricultural loan waiver.

V.N.K. MENON   12 January 2017 at 21:49

Legal notice

dear experts,

An advocate sent my son a legal notice on behalf of client "B".

In response, instead of advocate, if a reply is sent to "B" in reply to legal notice - Is it a valid act?

Thank you experts in anticipation for a considered reply.

rohan   12 January 2017 at 20:15

How to fight interim maintenance case

respected Sir/mam / site members, thankyou for creating this platform.

I am facing an Interim maintenance case from my wife. she is a BDS( dentist) and had 6 years of working experience. he last job pay was 25000 rs per month.

on the other hand i am b.com and i work for a BPO and is geeting 12400 rs per month currently as per my salary slip.

My manager told me if Dv is proved, they will terminate me. about Dv is am sure it wont be proved as i never did any such dirty activity. i always spent on my wife and helped her.

Plz guide me about how should i fight this Interim maintenance case. and if i quit my job and show myself as unemployed for some time, and show that i got fired, can that help me.

Respected Mam/sir plz help me, i am in lots of tension

shivshanker jain   12 January 2017 at 19:38

No due certificate

i have resigned from private limited company, i want to take no due certificate from company so company can not claim any liabilities of creditors . company has not taken any sort of finance till today.

can i have format for legal no due certificate to take from compan as well as tell what all docs i should take from company for my safety

Member (Account Deleted)   12 January 2017 at 19:31

Withdrawal of proceedings of exhibit 5

Exhibit 5 filed by plaintiff...... Respondent had submitted reply and plaintiff had also submitted counter affidavit . Now plaintiff denies to execute proceedings of exhibit 5 .......... And now he files fresh exhibit 17 under order 39 rule 1 & 2 however such new exhibit has same contents but has only changed his prayers .... So can he do this????

Arun Kumar Agrawal   12 January 2017 at 19:25

Title suit


Query:
Facts:

An oral agreement reduced to a memorandum of family arrangement was made in 1980 between my father (youngest of the three brothers) and his two brothers in respect my grandfather’s property and was reduced in writing and signed by all three of them. All three parties to the agreement are deceased. One of the clauses said that each member will have the properties against his name will have the property transferred in his name and will not have anything to do each other.
The eldest brother of my father and my father were allotted 1/3rd and 2/3rd share in an orchard.
The 2/3rd share property of my father was further divided into three parts, with one part going to my parents, one part to my brother and one part to me in1991 through a memorandum of family partition.
My father’s elder brother passed away in 2002 and has an adopted son as his successor (Referred to as A). My father died in 2006. My father’s elder brother use to reside in the village where all the property is located while my father lived was a doctor in a town 150 km from the village and completely trusted his elder brother who use to look after the orchard property. The orchard property was never divided or demarcated. The land was not mutated in their names and according to the revenue record continues to be in my grandfather’s name.
The land is located by the bank of the river on one side and by the national highway on the other. Some portion of the land in the 2/3rd share of my father has been eroded into the river. One does not know when.
It was discovered that though three different plots no ( according to the present revenue records) were allotted in the one third share of my father’s elder brother, only one is in the possession right now, the other plots which are adjascent portion are now common land in the form of a village road, This may have come up after 1980. As a result only 50 % of the land is in possession in the three plots.
So the present position of the land is that there is 50% short of land in the my father’s elder brothers portion and 40% in my father’s portion.
My portion of the land is adjacent to that of A
Recently in 2013 acquires the river end of the land and about 1.92 crore compensation was to be paid. A manipulated the records and the government officials to have 60 lacs to be paid to him and filed false affidavit
showing a portion of the land belonging to me and my father as his. This attempt was foiled days before the payment was to be made by filing objections under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.
Now he as has filed a tittle suit stating therien that he has been in continuous possession of land which was allotted to my father and then allotted to me. This portion of the land claimed in the title suit is in a different from the plot in which he had claimed compensation of 60 lacs from the government.
His claim is based on the error based in 1980 partition and possession.
Given the facts the following queries:
1. Is the suit time barred under limitation?
2. Is it a title suit or is it a revision of the partition and therefore should be a Partition suit?
3. What should be my defence?