Kumari Cheenu
03 February 2018 at 12:51
I appear in person in my case. Last date was fixed for the argument, but the petitioner's Advocate asked for the adjournment stating that he is not ready. I filed the "Written Argument" & supplied a copy to the Opponent also.
My questions are:---
1. Was it right, that Judge Saheb gave an easy adjournment to my opponent just because he was not ready to argue? Was this a valid reason? Though, it was his case.
2. Was it mandatory for me to give copy of "Written Argument" my opponent?
3. Who submits the Argument first in a case, the Petitioner or the Respondent? Is there any rule?
Note:-- I being the Respondent was asked not to stand in my left side before Judge Saheb. There are many unwritten rules of the Court, that is why I am asking subtle questions. Any more suggestions for ppl like me appearing in person would be very much helpful.
Ashok
03 February 2018 at 12:34
I am a bank employee and suspended from one year. bank was giving me 50% Subsistence allowance during suspension till Dec.2017. But from Jan 2018 deduction of staff overdue account is done 2/3. Subsistence allowance credited in my account is only 1/3. I want to know the laws regarding Subsistence allowance during suspension & deductions. thanks
ashok
RUCHI KOHLI
03 February 2018 at 11:37
We are applying of ICSE affiliation for which 2000 sq m land is required under possession. We have 1246.40 sq mt land registered and 735.60 sq m through long term tenancy but board observes possession of 1246.40 sq m land and require more clarification further. I want to know how can i tell that we possess required 2000 sq m land. Kindly suggest statement in few words. Thanking you in anticipation.
Harish M
03 February 2018 at 11:12
Sir:
I want to file case on college.
Facts:
I joined 3 year BBM course. Paid fees plus donation total 4 lakhs. But classes did not start at all even after 6 months. I have complained to university in writing. But no reply from them.
College principal asking me to pay rest of fees if I want to continue or asking me to simply leave.
I have paid money by taking education loan.
So in this case which court to approach in order to get my money back.
I have enquired few people did researching in internet. I got information about consumer court. So I visited consumer court to see how things go about there.
I heard judge telling do you keep vakil to many people who were inside court hall.
Is keeping vakil necessary?
If not consumer court which other court to go and ask relief?
Under which section to file case and which court I should go, asking for refund of fees can anyone guide?
PS: Another problem is my markscards of 12th are with the college. If I do case, will they give my markscard back?
Please help.
Anonymous
03 February 2018 at 10:34
Information: As per initial survey revenue record(1958),survey no:353/1 is of 4 acres owned by 3 members . survey no: 353/2 is of 8 Acres owned by 6 members (1.Mr.Ram, 2. Mr.B, 3.Mr.Dasaradh, 4.Mr.D, 5.Mr.E, 6.Mr.F) but each person share is not mentioned in that record. then, Re-survey done in 1967. In between 1958 to 1967 there is no survey record. As per Re-survey record(1967),survey no:353/1 is sub divided into 4 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/1,353/2,353/3,353/4) survey no:353/2 is sub divided into 8 sub divisons of 1acre each (353/5,353/6,353/7,353/8,353/9,353/10,353/11,353/12). it is clearly mentioned that S.No 353/10 is owned by Mr.Putra son of Mr. Lakshman in re-survey revenue record(1967). Case: Mr.Dasaradh has two sons Mr.Ram and Mr.Lakshman. Mr.Ram has 3 sons, namely Mr.ramesh, Mr.suresh, Mr. Naresh. Mr.Lakshman has 1 son ,namely Mr.Putra. In 1974, Mr.Ravana bought 1 acre of land from Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram. in that sale deed it is mentioned that out of 8 acres in s.no 353/2, 1 acre of land sold by Mr.ramesh son of Mr.Ram to Mr.Ravana. there is no specific detail about the 1 acre survey number in that sale deed. S.no: 353/10 is mutated into the name of Mr.Putra's wife and it is in the enjoyment of her. due to old age of Mr.putra's wife , she left the village and staying with her children in city. by taking this advantage Mr.Ravana son is trying to occupy the land of Mr.Putra's wife by showing the sale deed mentioned above. now, Mr.putra's wife went to the court , and got the interim injuction order against Mr.Ravana's son. Mr.Ravana's son submitted sale deed in the court and claiming S.No 353/10 because of no clarity about 1 acre land survey number purchased by Mr.Ravana. For 353/2 There are 6 members. In that 6 Members Mr. RAM and Mr. Dasaradh are Elder son and father. Other 4 Members are different persons. After re-survey 353/2 sub divided as 353/5 to 353/12. In 353/5 to 353/12 Elder son Share is Not mentioned. But Elder son Mr. Ram's Elder son Mr. Ramesh sold 1 acre to Mr. Ravana. Whereas younger son Mr. Lakshman's son Mr. Putra Share is mentioned as 353/10 In re-survey Record. Will Ravana's son get succeded in this case?
Anonymous
03 February 2018 at 09:21
I m a student of llm.i intersted to do ca or cs.what is the best option to me to accelerate my career?
Siddhartha
03 February 2018 at 08:30
Res. Experts,
I filed a complaint before police regarding offences involving sexual harassment and ongoing victimization of the victim.
As per trend, police didn't do anything.
I filed an application under section 156(3)before MM.
MM called upon ATR from SHO and he replied that the matter doesn't fall under jurisdiction of his police station. Obviously the police is not understanding the matter deliberately in a bid to avoid their duty, under collusion with the culprits. Police did not mention any cause for not registering the case. Neither, they enquired about anything.
police also pointed out a fact in my complaint, that I previously filed an application under section 156(3) in year 2008 regarding same offence, while the present complaint has no connection with that case and the offences reported vide the present complaints were not even in existence at that time.
I just mentioned the fact that, the victim is being victimized since filing of the complaint in 2008 regarding sexual harassment before court.
Pertinently their is a provision of zero FIR in sexual harassment cases.
I have taken adjournment in the matter.
Now, My question is that,
1) can I withdraw the application filed under section 156(3) and file a fresh complaint before police, precisely pointing out the offences going on under their jurisdictional area.
2) if I don't withdraw the complaint, what are the options before MM? ?
3) Can I file another complaint before police after decision of MM??
Please guide me, I shall be thankful.
DARSHAN C
03 February 2018 at 08:16
Can i file RTI about how my parents property was transferred ?
My father(Late) has given his only property to my cousin's wife as gift deed. Even being the only daughter I was not informed about this. How to file an RTI to know more details about this transaction?
Raman Mudumbai
03 February 2018 at 00:40
Respected all,
My family has been encountered with a problem relating to our ancestral House Property. The issue is as follows.
My Father has two elder brothers and sisters and a younger brother (6 members along with my father). They have a House Property registered in the name of their mother. My Grandfather is a Govt Teacher, expired at the age of 58, maybe. Two of the elder sons were employed by the time my Grand Father has expired. My Father was a graduate (M.A, B.Ed) at that time and the younger son was pursuing +2 at that time. My Grand father's job was offered to both my Father and the younger son saying that my father will be given an equivalent job to that of my grandpa's and if it was to be given to the younger, he will get attender equivalent post (due to lack of any degree). All my family members (including the younger) advised and agreed that my father should be given that job. All this has happened some 20-22 years ago. My younger uncle has his own entrepreneurship, and has became the richest of the other three. As my elder uncles are approaching retirement, we have a plan to divide the House Property into 4 parts (my grand mother has expired). But the Younger one is alleging that - as my father was given my grand father's job, may father is not entitled to his share in the House Property. Instead, the younger one has the right over my father's share in the HP, claiming that he has sacrificed the job to my father. Also he is condemning that if my father assigns his pension to the him then my father is entitled to a share in HP. Nothing was agreed in oral/writing at the time of giving my grand father's job to my father. Had it been discussed at that time, my father would haven't taken that job (since my father have already completed MA also). Does my younger Uncle's claim stands valid? I request you to please guide me to relevant Acts and Provisions applicable in the case above.
Thanking You Sincerely in advance.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Legal heir certificate for property
sir our house property is from tamilnadu vellore dist. my grandfather's fathers property . now till date my father his expired 2001 i have death certificate of my father. and i have no any death certificate of my grand father's father. now me and my fathers brother both are the legal heir of my property. legal heir certificate can b issued by the govt for both of us or single. who has right to apply the legal heir certificate? whether my signature & Death certificate of my father is not necessary to apply for legal heir certificate. pls give a solution sir