jach000019
25 April 2009 at 19:10
on the basis of the WILL of my late father i.e of the year 1998(which is not registered and not yet probated) and as per the WILL flat premises which was purchased by my father during his lifetime and was in his name, was given to me and my younger brother and shop premises was given to my elder brother which was purchased by my father during his lifetime in the HUF name as he was the KARTA (i have the copy of the agreement with me ) shop receipt also reprtesent his nme as KARTA under HUF but the share certificate of the shop was in the name of my father and my elder brother jointly, therefore on the basis of the WILL, we all the 7 legal heirs i.e 4 elder sisters(all are married before 1990) and we 3 younger brothers, mutually accepted the will and duly executed and notarized the joint affidavit (with notary's book no. on it) regarding AACEPTANCE OF THE WILL and jointly executed the affidavit/consent/NOC regarding the distribution of the assets among the legal heirs but when i had given the application to the society (in the year 1999) for transfering the flat premises in my and my younger brother's favour on the basis of the WILL alongwith the NOC of my other legal heirs. my elder brother took the objection to the society regarding not to transfer the flat premises in my and my brother's name stating WILL executed by my father and his given ACCEPTANCE OF THE WILL and NOC( jointly notarizd) for the flat premises is bogus therefore flat premises should not be transfered in his younger brother's name (i.e me and my younger brother) therefore my society stopped the procedure of transferring the flat in our favour similarly me and my younger brother also given the stop transfer letter to the concerned society for not to transfer the shop in his favour mentioning that as he has stopped the flat transfer in our favour therefore shop should be transfered only after getting our fresh consent but as the share certificate of the shop was in the joint names of my father and my brother name, the concerned society duly deleted the neme of my father from the shop's share certificate,and after the period of 7 years we i.e me and my younger brother filed a case against the society in the dy.registrar for getting the flat transfered in our names and dy.registrar after scrtinizing of all the documents i.e notarized consents of the heirs and persuing all the documents i,e WILL and ACCEPTANCE OF THE WILL OF THE LEGAL HEIRS, NOC of the others legal heirs for transfering the flat in our favour, dy registrar gave the decision in our favour and issued the order to the society that since WILL and ITS ACCEPTANCDE AND NOC of the legal heirs is not negatived by any court therefeore the flat should be transfered in our anme that is me and my younger brother's name threrefore society should transfer the flat.subsquently soc, also allotted us the membership of the society and also transfered the share certificate in our names. now my brother has filed the revesion application before the joint registrar and the matter is pending therefore i would like to know what the deceision joint registrar can give as the flat already has been transfered in our name, is in our possesion of me and my younger brother and we are paying the outgoing of it to the society similarly socieyt is also issuing the receeipt in our name,on the other hand shop is in the possesion of my elder brother and the share certificate also on his name as the name of my father has been deleted he has given the shop on rent and enjoying the rent amount similarly flat premises is in the possesion of me and my younger brother and we are paying the outgoing of it to the society similarly socieyt is also issuing the receeipt in our name.
(1) what the decesion joint registrar can
give in this regard when the flat
premises has been already transfererd.
(2) will there be any need of probating
of the WILL?
(2) after the gape of 10 years does my
brother can chellange t
jach000019
25 April 2009 at 15:15
(1) UP TO HOW AMNY YEARS WILL CAN BE CHELLANGED?
(2) WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A NOTARIZED EXECUTED CONSENT FOR THE WILL IS IN THE EYES OF LAW?
(3)ALL THE PROPERTY OF THE WILL IS DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE BENEFICIARIES STILL THE PROBATE OF THE WILL IS NECESSARY?
(4)BENEFICIERIES OF THE WILL CAN CHELLANGE THE WILL AFTER TAKING HIS DISTRIBUTION?
Chetan Subhash Deshpande
25 April 2009 at 14:35
There will be sea change in Indirect Taxes in India by introduction of GST from 01-04-2010.I will be very greatful if anybody provide me Draft Goods & Services Tax Act
jach000019
25 April 2009 at 14:26
in mumbai, under redevelopment of ch.hsg.soc, is it possible to get 2 flats with separate entrance instead of 1 bigger flat from the developer, is there is any problem for the society to issue 1 additional share certificates for the extra flat. in my case i have the carpet area of my existing flat i.e 700sq.ft.carprt having the 1 share certificate standing in the names of me and my younger brother but now after redevepoment the area of my flat will be 940 sq.ft. i.e 240 additional area will be given by the developer/builder but now i want to get 2 flats of 1 bhk having the area 470 sq.ft. carpet of each flat with separate entrance. therefore is it possible to get 2 flats as per the law and will society issue the extra share certificate for the extra flat wihich i will get after redevelopment.
lohithakshan u k
25 April 2009 at 13:21
I HAVE PAID RS. 20000/- TOWARDS PREPAYMENT ON MY HOUSING LOAN A/C.AFTER RECIEVING THIS THEY KEPT THE SAME FOR WEEK AND COLLECTED FROM BANK ACCOUNT WITHOUT ACCOUNTING IN MY NAME. THEY ARE NOT ISSUING RECIEPTS FOR THE PAYMENTS, INSTEAD AND LETTER SHOWING THE DETAILS AND BALANCE AMOUNT PAYABLE TO THEM.IN THE ABOVE CASE THEY HAVE NOT ISSUED THE LETTER AND I SUSPECT THEY HAVE MISAPROPRIATED THE CHEQUE WITHOUT RECIPTING IN MY NAME. WHEN CONTACTED THEY ARE NOT ANSWERING PROPERLY. PL. ADVISE WHAT TO DO.
A Truthseeker
25 April 2009 at 12:40
hindu religion is most acridly attacked particularly for the practice of sutee-custom once upon a time.today, no sane person would support that once prevalent obnoxious custom but the question remains sud the entire hindu philosophy be held responsible for that practice? if so, then sud not christianity be discarded? the victims of sutee practice did not compose nor explain the Vedas but it was Christ himself who propounded the New Testament with Old Testament as its corner stone yet like a victim of sutee christ was killed in the name of religion!
pathan shiyaz khan
25 April 2009 at 11:26
towers implanted in the residential areas by the the telecom companies causing harm to the people through radiations.any case or citation or any precendent with effect to this for my case. plz give me the answer.
Narender kumar
25 April 2009 at 09:45
Hello Respected all, I want to suggest & want to know that how my suggestion can take legal stand. My suggetion is that to Improve voter percentage there should be a vote cast certificate which must be issued by presiding officer in favour of voter,this certificate must compulsory for all gov. facilities like DL,Pass port,addmission of children & other Important activities.Thus certificate will last long till next election.This type of action can improve vote cast percentage in our country.
p k kapoor
25 April 2009 at 08:11
IN case of payment EDLI charge,the requirement under EMPloyees' Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme is as follows:
"No amount is recovered from employee's wages . Employer should pay 0.5% of total wages subject to a ceiling of Rs. 6500/- per month ( w.e.f. 1-06-2001)."
In case of an organisation, however, this EDLI charge was calculated on total wages till March 2009 instead of restricting EDLI charge to the wage ceiling amount of Rs.6500. The matter was discussed with EPFO organisation and they stated that it can be adjusted in future payments.
My query is
(1)Under which circular of Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), adjustment of this payment is allowed.
(2) What is the provision in this regard in relevant EPFO rule/act position
(3) Whether this recovery from future payment, can be made from total amount payable to EPFO or recovery of this excess EDLI payment is to be restricted against future EDLI payment only.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
diversion of Hindu Children Samadhies
How far diversion of Hindu Children Samadhies into the public park by State is direct interference into the religious sentiments of the public? and whether the court can interfere into such matters?