Vidyasagar verma
20 September 2018 at 17:18
Meri sister bina bataye ghar se chali gayi uske baad humne use sabhi jagah talash kiya relation and hum uske jitne friend ko jante the waha par bhi talash kiya but wah kahi nahi mili Then 12 hours ke baad humne complain register karwaya and sak ke aadhar par ek ladake ka naam jisse wah mobile par bat karti thi uska namm darz karwaya aur police officer ne sec 363 ipc ka Fir darz kiya hai.
But complain register karwane ke 8 hours. Ke baad uski friend(school friend jiske baare me humko nahi pata tha)ke wahha se pata chala ki meri sister wahi Par hai.Then mai apni sister ko lekar Police station par gaya and complain return lene ko kaha par ab police officer bol rahe ki complain wapas nahi hoga aur meri sister ko apni custody me le liya aur bole ki ab medical and magistrate ke samne statement hoga .
Aur mere upar bhi action lenge kyoki maine sak ke aadhar par ek ladke ka namm darz karaya hai.
so sir iska solution kya hai?and my question is-
1-kya complain wapas ho sakta hai aur police station me hi settlement ho sakata hai?
2-kya mere upar koi case banta hai kyoki maine kisi ladake ka naam diya hai?
Sir iska kya solution hai kyoki mai LAw ke bare me jayada information nahi hai.
Please help me.
Thank you.
Anonymous
20 September 2018 at 16:52
I am a senior citizen of about 70 years and have been falsely made as one of the respondents (R-3) in a d/v case. The purpose is to harass me and get easy money by Opposite Party.
As far the D/V case is concerned, the d/v case is clearly time-barred as per S-468 CrPC and as per case laws/precedents. So also there are proofs like Police Control Room Report that the complainant lady was kept under captivity by her parents and indoctrinated to launch lucrative “d/v business”. As such I filed a case in the High Court for quashing by the high court the d/v case (pending in the family court). Factually, adjournment-after-adjournment are given. As defined in S-37 Specific Relief Act, I was 'enjoined from the assertion of my right' and peaceful life and I am deliberately being harassed by calling to the court now and then to extract money at this age. I hope I have delivered the goods for the purpose of queries:
QUERY -1:
[With regard to privilege for senior citizens]
---------------------------------------------------------
Will I be able to approach Supreme Court, DIRECTLY INSTEAD OF DIVISION BENCH, by way of SLP against an order of the single judge of the high court which adjourned the said d/v case for a date after 6 months from now.
Incidentally, in yet another civil (employment) matter, BEING A SENIOR CITIZEN, I was successful in getting a direction from the Apex Court asking the High Court to dispose of the said matter within 3 months. Can I apply the same route here.
QUERY-2:
With regard to lower court matter
--------------------------------------------
Usually courts grant injunction NOT beyond 6 months of the lower courts. Whether further injunction is granted on the expiry of the initial 6 months which I do not know.
Hope experts will be kind enough to give their considered guidance to enable me to decide the next course of action.
Justification for posting as anonymous: Because there is a possibility that the Opp.Party may see the source of query.
Thank you in anticipation.
aananth
20 September 2018 at 16:48
Settlement deed was registered as irrevocable. It was revoked after one year. In the Deed for Revocation, it was stated, the subject property was not in the settled persons use, settlees did not accept the settlement; in truth the property is in the hands of one of person named in the settlement deed for more than 15 years, where he is running a business for his living. Six persons were named in the settlement deed. Three brothers did not accept this revocation. Original is in the father's (Settler) possession. What we have to do? It was done unilaterally by the settler. Is there any remedy? The Sub-registrar's office is in Tamilnadu. Thanks Experts in advance.
Anonymous
20 September 2018 at 16:38
we are for the unregistered partnership firm , engaged the verious trade in the market we sold the goods on the purchasing order made by customer XYZ, the customer issued a cheque of R s.4 Lacs in the name of our unregistered, firm this cheque was got dishonor, we could not filed the case under section 138 NI Act there after we demand for making all payment but he is evading and move away from making the payment of our out standing amount. Now we want to file a recovery suit u/o 37 CPC. The question is whether we(unregistered) can filed suit for recovery through its partners against said customer/respondent?????
if not what is the next legal remedy available for us??
Anonymous
20 September 2018 at 16:00
I have a shop. In 1988, this shop was divided in 2 parts, each having diff. owner. That time i purchased 1 part from the 1st owner and he did sale deed in my name. The 2nd owner leased his part to me as he did not want to sell. In the lease deed done 30 years back it was stated "the second party (me) is at liberty to make any addition or alteration on or in the demised premises and the first party (in this case owner) shall have no objection for the same". Since 1988 i have been running shop of which half part i am owner and half i have on lease.
In 1997 the other owner sold this leased part to a 3rd party and since 1997 i am paying rent to the 3rd party on basis of the original 1988 lease . Now the shop needs renovation. My query is if i do renovation can 3rd party object or stop the work by calling police. We are not on talking terms and i deposit rent every month in his account. If i ask him for permission to renovate he will say no. I feel rules of old lease are valid as he bought the half part knowing pre-existence of lease, he has been accepting lease rent since 1997 and lease agreement entered before the acquisition should be bound on the new acquirer i.e. 3rd party. Please advise.
at your mercy
20 September 2018 at 15:58
Ours is housing welfare society consisting of 177 flats at Madurai. Tamilnadu.
The registration renewLs missed for 15 years. Now they thinking to for registration as if new. What is legal consequence for any civil or criminal right?
PleSe advise.
MAHESH
20 September 2018 at 14:48
Sir,
how to prepare a good reply of memo of charge. What is the format. WHat is the beginning of the sentence and ending sentence. pls inform
Naresh Kumar
20 September 2018 at 14:47
A (owner) signed a collaboration agreement with B (contractor) that B will construct four floors on A’s land and entire cost of construction will be borne by B and one floor will be retained by B towards his share. Construction is about to complete. Now B does not want to take a floor and instead of it, B want that his share of one floor be sold to C (purchaser) who is ready to buy one floor. Now C is ready to buy the floor and it has been decided that an agreement to sell will be prepared between C & A and cost of floor will be paid by C to A through cheques. On receiving the payment from C, B will return the entire money to A.
My query are :-
1. Can C buy one floor from A, which floor is meant for B as per collaboration agreement considering that things are taking place as per the desire of B and B would be one of the witness in Agreement to sell and later on in Sale Deed.
2. Can C fall in any legal dispute which might take place between A & B or it will be a safe deal for C.
Kindly reply.
Anonymous
20 September 2018 at 14:05
Nowadays in every bank staff are forced to sell general insurance policies, hampering other customer service counter. Is it every staff is rightly authorize to sell insurance policies or only authorized insurance facilitator or agent can sell the insurance policies. Is there any regulation/guidelines are issued by IRDA ,in this regards, who will sell the insurance policies.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
legal advise
my question is regarding provision, law existing clarity.
if a victim is in position of evidence then law empowers him/her to do whatever he/she wants without moving to police, court. or law empowers to do whatever he/she wants without moving to legal authority and taking law himself in hand or it is legal to do without informing anybody. or what is law please consider case to be any little or high serious or any crime whatsoever.