Bhupesh Rawat
15 July 2011 at 00:46
Respected Sir,
I am Bhupesh Rawat, i was working as a Sr.Software Engineer in a Delhi based company Olive E Business located at B1 / H2, Mohan Coopertive, Mathura Road, Near Haldiram, New Delhi, my employee id was OL-225. I worked there from 1st Sep 2005 to 26th Feb 2010. During my working period the company did not paid my three and half month salary. Whenever i ask them the company officials refuse to reply anything, i have also send mails to the directors of the company regarding this several times but i did not got any reply from them, it seems that they are not in a mood to pay the pending salary. The company has done this things to other ex-employees also.
I request to kindly give the solution so that we can get our hard earned money back.
N.J. MISHRA
14 July 2011 at 15:51
CAN P.F. INSPECTION CAN BE DONE BY ANY REGIONAL E.S.I. INPECTOR. WHETHER E.S.I. INSPECTOR FROM DELHI CAN ASK THE COMPANY BRANCH IN DELHI THAT HE WANTS TO VERIFY ALL DOCUMENTS THAT ARE MANIAINED IN HEAD OFFICE, SAY CHENNAI.
PLEASE MEMBER KINLDY GUIDE ME.
Ankarsh Rattan
14 July 2011 at 11:50
I have been working as Sr Scale Stenographer since Feb, 1993. Due to lack of Depttl Rules the Sectt rules are implemented. As per Sectt Rules after completion of 5 yrs Service as Sr Scale Stenographer, candidates are eligible to promotion. I represented my deptt for upgradation of my post. the deptt took up the case with Finance Deptt. Finance Deptt cleared my case for promotion after 13 years in 2007 with a condition that necessary amendment in rules may kindly be done. But for one reason or the other the rules are not amended till date. As per Sectt rules I am eligible for promotion from Feb 1998, but not getting it through. Please let me know what should I do to get my long pending dues. Thanks
with warm regards
Surinder Kaur
Anonymous
14 July 2011 at 02:11
I had been Terminated from my employment after 16 yrs. of my service. The employer had not given any prior notice of termination. The termination has been due to the fact that we 16 staff employees had taken the cause of raise of salary and Union activity under the leadership of Mr. Rajan Raje. The case is still been carried in the office of Labour Commissioner office. They give us Taareekh pe Tareekh. Please advice us how to fight this legal battle very fast.
BAYAPU REDDY
13 July 2011 at 14:47
IS IT MANDATORY TO IMPLEMENT PAY SCALES AT PAR WITH GOVT FOR TEACHING AS WELL AS NON TEACHING STAFF. ANY COURT JUDGEMENTS
N.J. MISHRA
13 July 2011 at 12:08
please member kinldy guide me in my below mentioned query
whether ESI inspector has right to comment on Employees Provident Fund registration or rules or can examine the same?
rajesh
13 July 2011 at 11:36
sir,
i am working in a central govt department in a gazetted officer rank, at ahmedabad. my spouse has been transferred on promotion to bangalore last year. An OM issued by DPT states that the cadre controlling authority should post the employee to the same station of posting of his or her spouse if post is available. Contrary to this, if i apply for a transfer to bangalore on personal grounds, my department wants me to give an undertaking or a mention in the request that i shall be willing to join a lower post (a direct fall from the grade pay 5400 to 4200) to consider my transfer, though they will protect my pay in the pay band. I was wondering how this is justified when on one hand Govt wants husband and wife serving in the same department to remain in the same station, and on the other hand the department is following the rules stipulated for transfer on personal grounds? Moreover, i feel depressed and demotivated since `grade pay' is the deciding factor (post 6th PC) for allowing almost every benefit to CG servants, downgrading to a non-gazetted post that too reducing to a grade pay two levels lower does not make sense. Anybody can advise me how to go ahead with my transfer request please???
skg
12 July 2011 at 22:24
In court case if a party produce a telephone recording as an evidence and the opposite party object the genuineness of this recording then what criteria court adopts in finalizing its genuiness. Also who has the first onus to prove either party or the opposite party and how it can be proved.
rgd
skg
skg
12 July 2011 at 22:14
During pendency of an ongoing labour case of illegal termination with cross examination of worker evidence is still
due,can a worker file an application u/s 33 C(2) for recovery of some dues which management says that workman is not
entitled whereas the workman has produced in its evidence the employee welfare policies where this due was pre existing for his level of employees and since they have received so he is also entitled.
If he is entitled what is the procedure to file application u/s 33 C (2) and whether he can file this application without the help of lawyer since lawyer is saying that we can file this application only after cross examination stage when the management is not able to prove our evidence of this due. Is he right?
Which is the form for this application and from where on internet this application form can be obtained.
rgds
skg
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
casual employee
Sir my question is whether casual employee comes with in definition of 'employee' under employee compensation act 1923 .also give some case law on it.