Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 14:58
R/s,
I asked query about form 19 of EPF, whom signature to be attested.
IN reply, Mr. S.Ganesan, Advocate Rajkumarlaxman,Mr. PS Dhingra,CEO, Dhingra Group and Mr. Prabhakar Singh have given their valuable experts advise.
Thanks for it.
In addition to above, I send form 19, attesting for bank manager to EPF Office, but they returned with objection that 'Liquidator 's sign is not mentioned. Please help.
prashant1314
24 August 2011 at 14:04
Dear Seniors,
Where I can get labour law recent judgements of HC asl well as Supreme Courts.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 10:35
Dear Sir,
I am an employee in an MNC for about four years. Due to some personal reason I resigned. As per my appointment letter i am suppose to server 2 months notice period. I am ready to server 1.5 months of notice period and ready to pay for 15 days of shortfall. But the company is not ready to accept the payment and wants me to come to office for 2 months. I have informed them that due to personal reason i would not be able to come post 1.5 months of notice period, and i am ready to pay for the remaining days. I do not have any project assigned to me as well, so no dependency on me. I want to know from you that is this valid on the company's part to force me to come to work?
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 09:32
The employer had filed recall application against the ex- parte award of the labour court without mentioning the act under which the recall application had been filed not by the party but by the authorized representative of the company simple plain paper without affidavit and without delay condone application after 30 days of publication.
However it is pertinent to mention here that the award is not ex-parte as the company has filed w/s, rejoinder affidavit, refused to file documents ad absented itself deliberately in management witness and arguments. It has also filed various interlocutory applications/ objections rejected before passing award under the direction of high court to decide the issue at earliest.
Now challenging before the writ court the award, the recall application which was rejected under the state act while the reference order is in the central act.
Is this issue will have any serious implication in the writ court?
How this issue should be argued before the writ court?
Is there any ruling in support of submission.
Let me know.
Anonymous
23 August 2011 at 21:57
The employer had filed recall application against the ex- parte award of the labour court without mentioning the act under which the recall application had been filed not by the party but by the authorized representative of the company simple plain paper without affidavit and without delay condone application after 30 days of publication.
However it is pertinent to mention here that the award is not ex-parte as the company has filed w/s, rejoinder affidavit, refused to file documents ad absented itself deliberately in management witness and arguments. It has also filed various interlocutory applications/ objections rejected before passing award under the direction of high court to decide the issue at earliest.
Now challenging before the writ court the award, the recall application which was rejected under the state act while the reference order is in the central act.
Is this issue will have any serious implication in the writ court?
How this issue should be argued before the writ court?
Is there any ruling in support of submission.
Let me know.
noor
23 August 2011 at 21:12
i am petitioner in id-- and there are 16 members more they also file difrent id and we get somde oder and same is respndent go appeal in high court for stay and they succeeded but on condition they have pay the throgh 17(B) when we going to file mp behailf of all in one mp can we filr like that . and also we filing this mp after 9 years is there any problem
it is urgent tell me
Anonymous
23 August 2011 at 15:47
There is one discrepancy out here.
As per my offer letter and Appointment letter it says "Service Agreement:
"Post your joining, should you accept any specialized training whether in India or abroad, you will be
required to commit to serve (Company name removed) for a minimum period of 12 months as per the (Company name removed)
policy. You will be required to enter into a Service Agreement, as per (Company name removed)policy on
Training, supported with a Guarantee in the form and manner decided by (Company name removed). You are under
no obligation to accept any training requiring a commitment to serve (Company name removed)on your part.
However, once accepted by you, it will be a binding contract."
As per the above it clearly says 12 months of bond but on Actual non-judical stamped paper, They have mentioned 24 months.and I signed both Appointment letter(12 months) and actual bond(24 months).But I was under impression that bond will be for 1 year as we get offer letter first and accept it and second comes Bond.So they should not have made this mistake in my Offer,Appointment and Bond ?
Can they waive off the bond on this ?
or will I have to pay ? Please reply and help me .....
Amar Chand Khatik
23 August 2011 at 10:06
Message :
I joined The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. on 1st August 2008 vide appointment letter dated 16/07/2008 in the capacity of Junior Assistant and also submitted Attestation From on 04/08/2010 including all information of myself as per the best of my knowledge, understanding and discretion. Thereafter, I was posted at Kalamboli Warehousing Complex and continue to perform my duties to the best of my ability. As per appointment letter dated 16/07/2008, I was completed one year probation period satisfactorily without any adverse communication or otherwise. In fact, my works appointed by my Supremes. However, so far, I was not received the confirmation letter, I was written letter dated 24/02/2010 and 10/03/2010 to HRD and Vigilance Section for my confirmation. In response to above letter, I was received letter no.CCI/HRD/(976/2010) dated 12/03/2010 from HRD Section towards the verification of my antecedents and character is still under process. After completion of my probation period and further 8 months, Corporation was not taken appropriate action in this case. Therefore once again request on 30/03/2010 and 25/04/2010 to HRD and Vigilance Section that satisfactorily completion of probation period, my services may be confirmed with immediate effect and a confirmation letter be issued accordingly. I am also talks to senior officer Shri S.L. Khanna, General Manager, towards confirmation of my services. Shri S.L. Khanna was said that The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. was not issued extentation letter and other correspondence for your confirmation than CCI Ltd. have been deemed confirm of your service as regular employee and official formality would be complete any time. I am also submitted Case documents of Case No.137/02 and 277/04 to HRD and Vigilance Section on 02/12/2010 issued by Court accordingly. As per Attestation Form, Column No.12 (1) (a) pertaining to arrest (b) pertaining to prosecution and (f) pertaining to convicted by a Court of Law for any offence. I was given details of above Column No.12 (1) (a) No, because Honble Court give Anticipatory bail in case no.137/02 and police not also been physically arrest in case no.277/04 (b) No, because as per my knowledge of prosecution means, the Court charge on criminal and defected activities his Country (f) No, harassment on the disposal and mutual settled, because the case was also mutual settle the both party. But I am also cleared that Court was finished case after harassment on the disposal and mutual settled. I am submitted the above information for your ready reference. Please treat as urgent of the case for my career. Thanking you,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ctc
Dear sir,
I want to know that,how do we calculate ctc of employee.