sunil
18 September 2012 at 12:18
is it necessary to register a coaching centre in delhi
Deepak
17 September 2012 at 15:37
Dear Sir,
Me and my wife are belongs to SC community. But since I am a Christian I fall under BC category. As my wife religion is Hindu, she fall under SC category. Are we eligible to get employment benefits under Goverment of Tamil Nadu as per Inter cast marriage law?
Please adivice.
Thank you in advance
Deepak
Chennai
Pramod Kumar
17 September 2012 at 00:35
Hello All Members
I want to know that what are the rules about Gap in service?
Let us take an example:-
'A person' works as a lecturer in Ayurvedic Medical college for approx five and a half year.
After that (s)he left this job and then joins as a research scientist in ayurvedic Company. (s)he works for so many thiongs. Please look it as University Grants Commission counts this as experience gain. Also so many theoritical Research articles published in various National level Magazine with some uniqueness. (S)he works this way for 24 years.
Then again (s)he offered a teaching job in another Ayurvedic College.
I think as per rule if a person change his/her profile in the job i.e. if (s)he had done the work which is not related to his/her previous job then it will counts as a GAP. Otherwise if both the works are related then it will not be mentioned as Gap.(This is my thinking)
UGC Approve this and says that if a person works as a researcher for 10 years or more then (s)he may be appointed directly to the post of professor.
Central Council of Indian Medicine (An autonomous body under AYUSH Department of health Ministry) says that we do not bother with the UGC. But CCIM courses are taught to students in different colleges & those are to be affiliated with any University.
Here the matter is if CCIM wants to recognize UGC Rulings or not, I am not asking for that.
My question is Either you approve or disapprove UGC rulings but How can you say that this 24 years is a Big Gap? The person working for same type of work and has more inventive experience than another who is only teaching.
Please give me the solution for this. What the Indian Law says for this.
ravinder kumar atri
16 September 2012 at 22:54
I work at delhi high court as jr. Judicial Assistant.
I wish to start an ngo for students of government school. Can I do that. Can I hold any position in that. How? Please guide
Sudhir Tiwari
15 September 2012 at 23:26
D/Sir,
Ours is a Big Textile Company ( 20 years old) situated in Madhya Pradesh & manpower engaged is about 1500. 15years ago 4 Union have get Registration from Registrar of Trade Union Govt.of M.P. First Union is releted to BMS, Second Union reletad to INTUC, Third Union related to kamgar Ekta & Last Fourth Union is related to AITUC.But Fourth Union related to AITUC is totally inactive since its registration & neither it has any office bearer nor single membership even most of workers of our company dont know about this union because it was totally like dead. but aforesaid first 3 Union is very active in our company and we also negotiate with them for Wage settlement, work Load Settlement,Bonus Settlement etc since long time.( We have done all 3 Wage settlement in past with these 3 Unions) we give importance to all 3 Unions same.Wage settlement of Workers for 5 years is due from 01.08.2012. First 3 Union have forwarded their "Charter of Demand" to us and accordingly we are negotiating with these 3 unions & we are also meeting with Conciliation Officer in Govt.Labour office. but suddenly we have received one "Charter of Demand" Letter through post of 4th Union related to AITUC ( which was like as dead since its registration)& asked to parcipate with 3 Unions for wage settlement. a Group of 4-5 workers also given this Letter to Govt.Labour office.Govt Labour office without any inquiry asked to us why not negotiating with this union.we have requested to Govt.Labour officer to ask them (AITUC) about their membership but Govt.Labour officer is saying that you should negotiation with this union also along with other (3) unions.
Now our query is
Can Govt.Labour Officer( Conciliation officer) direct us to negotiate with this Union?
if yes then what is remedy.
what type of step should we taken so that this Union can't enter in negotiation.
Thanks
Sudhir Tiwari
chitra gupta
15 September 2012 at 18:29
avery interesting real case in a psu *the disciplinary authority finally restarted thepreliminary enquiry after 5yrs(removing the biased io and po also) but did not inform the suspended employee anything.the disciplinary authority is not payiny the suspended employee subsistance allowance for the last 55 months.the suspended employee has been denied subsistance allowance.is it not denial of defenceto be taken (and gurranted under the constitution) by the suspended employee. he requested payment first and stay on the proceedings.....but it was not granted by the present io as he told that he is not drawing and disbursing officer. now how we will tackle this peculiar situation in socialist india with democracy......a real facts ....plz give ur expart opinion to save the family of the ill fated employee thanks
Member (Account Deleted)
15 September 2012 at 09:25
Divisional Bench gave this judgement in a special appeal filed for the recruitment of physiotherapists in uttarakhand.
We, accordingly, allow the appeal and modify the
judgment and order under appeal by upholding the quashing of
concerned merit list of Physiotherapists prepared by the Board, but at
the same time, direct the Board to reject all those examinees, who
appeared in the examination for being appointed as Physiotherapists,
but not received 30% marks in diploma examination and to complete
the selection of Physiotherapists by adding to the marks obtained by
the fit examinees in the written examination, 30% marks for
intermediate examination and 70% marks for diploma / degree
examination. Let the said exercise be completed as quickly as
possible, but not later than two months from the date of service of a
copy of this order upon the Board.
Sir i want your help to interpret this judgement.please reply,thanks
i have attached the whole judgement for refrence.
K.S.Srinivas
14 September 2012 at 23:57
AP Power Distribution Company is a state Government of AP undertaking. In this company LDC is the initial cadre post and UDC is the first level promotion and Junior Accounts Officer (JAO) is the second level promotion. In the service rules a clause is provided for 25% of sanctioned posts of Junior Accounts Officer can be appointed through direct recruitment.
Certain candidates were initially appointed through direct recruitment as Junior Accounts Officers in May 2002 on yearly contract basis for a period of two years and these candidates were regularly appointed in May 2004. Seniority was given w.e.f. May 2004.
In October 2002 certain UDCs were promoted as Junior Accounts Officers and the seniority of these candidates was reckoned w.e.f. October 2002.
In the final seniority list promotee JAOs (promoted in October 2002) were placed above the the direct recruitee JAO regularly appointed in May 2004. Based on this seniority list some of the promotee JAOs were promoted as Assistant Accounts Officers (AAOs)and retired from service on or before December 2010.
In the year 2011 seniority list of JAOs was revised notionally placing the direct recruitee JAOs above the promotee JAOs by taking the initial date of appointment on yearly contract basis i.e.,May 2002 (by giving weightage for the contract service also for the purpose of seniority).
In the meantime some of the AAOs promoted (based on the original seniority list) from JAO cadre were retired and their pensionary benefits were settled. Now due to revision of seniority list of JAOs in the year 2011, some of the retired AAOs were ordered to be reverted to the lower post i.e., JAO and their pensionary benefits were also revised andreduced due to reversion.
It is requested to clarify whether (1)revision and reduction of pensionary benefits in respect of the retired AAOs is valid or not as they have actually worked in the cadre of AAOs and based on their last pay drawn, their pensionary benefits were settled.
(2) Can the revision of pension orders be challenged? If so please suggest the grounds and any case laws on this type of orders.
kumar
14 September 2012 at 16:25
I supressed the information about the current employer in the attestaion form as well as in apllication form for govt job.
Treating this as grave misconduct & supression of material information, my candidature was canceeled. However I met all the eligibilty criteria for appointment. Kindly advise wether such supression amounts to grave misconduct & supression of material information. Kindly advise what should be course of cation against the order of cancellation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Reversal from promoted post to previous post.
I was working as Foreman since 13/07/1995 in Coal India Limited a Govt. of India Undertaking. I have been promoted and joined as Welfare Officer Trainee on 11/02/2008 on the basis of a Company level written exam and interview. After joining I found the situation very adverse and applied for reversal back to previous post and place of posting on 07/12/2008, 20/12/2008, 24/06/2010 and 17/09/2012. But there is no any reply from company side till date. As per the para 2 of the promotion order if our performance not found satisfactory then we may be reverted back to previous post within three years of the joining in the promoted post.