Isaac Gabriel
19 September 2012 at 17:55
The employer suspends an employee in the verge of his superannuation.Paid subsistenece allowance for one month,and thereafter he attains the age of superannuation.But the enquiry continues for five years after superannuation.But subsistence allowance was not given.and the suspension was also not revoked either till the completion of enquiy Can he claim subsistenced allowance till the completion of enquiry after superannuation?.The management has not yet revoked the suspension either.
NAYAK MAFATLAL GORDHANDAS
18 September 2012 at 23:37
Sir, I am Bank Officer of Nationalised Bank and I was under long bias & prejuice minded suspension from 25/11/2009 to 06/05/2011. At the time of revocation of suspension,imposement of penalty was pending. Now, Disciplinary Authority has imposed penalty of reduction of six increment and regarding salary of suspension period, he wrote that "we treat it as not on duty, so no diffrence of salary will be paid."
Sir, for your knowledge, I was paid 1/3rd of salary for the first three months of suspension and thereafter, got 1/2 salary up to the revocation of suspension.
Sir, in suspension order it was written:1.without permission, not to leave the Head Quarter, 2.declaration of not having engaged in employmen/profession, 3.without permission not to enter in the office premises all over India.
Sir, please guide me: whether I can get the difference of salary of suspension period after revocation of supension in the present circumstances?
Sir, I am of the opinion that Disciplinary Authority had put ban on me not to enter into the office premises, declaration of not having engaged in other profession/engagement,not to leave the HQ without permission of him.
Sir, appeal against the pnishment order is pending, but management has effected the punishment order. furter more, new show cause notice is issued for the Branch from which I was suspended;
Sir, can bank issue new show cause for the branch where I was suspended and chargesheeted and after inquiry (ex-parte), punishment effected.
What to do?
Sir, please advice me.
PRAKASH CHANDRA SONI
18 September 2012 at 23:05
I was working as Foreman since 13/07/1995 in Coal India Limited a Govt. of India Undertaking. I have been promoted and joined as Welfare Officer Trainee on 11/02/2008 on the basis of a Company level written exam and interview. After joining I found the situation very adverse and applied for reversal back to previous post and place of posting on 07/12/2008, 20/12/2008, 24/06/2010 and 17/09/2012. But there is no any reply from company side till date. As per the para 2 of the promotion order if our performance not found satisfactory then we may be reverted back to previous post within three years of the joining in the promoted post.
sunil
18 September 2012 at 12:18
is it necessary to register a coaching centre in delhi
Deepak
17 September 2012 at 15:37
Dear Sir,
Me and my wife are belongs to SC community. But since I am a Christian I fall under BC category. As my wife religion is Hindu, she fall under SC category. Are we eligible to get employment benefits under Goverment of Tamil Nadu as per Inter cast marriage law?
Please adivice.
Thank you in advance
Deepak
Chennai
Pramod Kumar
17 September 2012 at 00:35
Hello All Members
I want to know that what are the rules about Gap in service?
Let us take an example:-
'A person' works as a lecturer in Ayurvedic Medical college for approx five and a half year.
After that (s)he left this job and then joins as a research scientist in ayurvedic Company. (s)he works for so many thiongs. Please look it as University Grants Commission counts this as experience gain. Also so many theoritical Research articles published in various National level Magazine with some uniqueness. (S)he works this way for 24 years.
Then again (s)he offered a teaching job in another Ayurvedic College.
I think as per rule if a person change his/her profile in the job i.e. if (s)he had done the work which is not related to his/her previous job then it will counts as a GAP. Otherwise if both the works are related then it will not be mentioned as Gap.(This is my thinking)
UGC Approve this and says that if a person works as a researcher for 10 years or more then (s)he may be appointed directly to the post of professor.
Central Council of Indian Medicine (An autonomous body under AYUSH Department of health Ministry) says that we do not bother with the UGC. But CCIM courses are taught to students in different colleges & those are to be affiliated with any University.
Here the matter is if CCIM wants to recognize UGC Rulings or not, I am not asking for that.
My question is Either you approve or disapprove UGC rulings but How can you say that this 24 years is a Big Gap? The person working for same type of work and has more inventive experience than another who is only teaching.
Please give me the solution for this. What the Indian Law says for this.
ravinder kumar atri
16 September 2012 at 22:54
I work at delhi high court as jr. Judicial Assistant.
I wish to start an ngo for students of government school. Can I do that. Can I hold any position in that. How? Please guide
Sudhir Tiwari
15 September 2012 at 23:26
D/Sir,
Ours is a Big Textile Company ( 20 years old) situated in Madhya Pradesh & manpower engaged is about 1500. 15years ago 4 Union have get Registration from Registrar of Trade Union Govt.of M.P. First Union is releted to BMS, Second Union reletad to INTUC, Third Union related to kamgar Ekta & Last Fourth Union is related to AITUC.But Fourth Union related to AITUC is totally inactive since its registration & neither it has any office bearer nor single membership even most of workers of our company dont know about this union because it was totally like dead. but aforesaid first 3 Union is very active in our company and we also negotiate with them for Wage settlement, work Load Settlement,Bonus Settlement etc since long time.( We have done all 3 Wage settlement in past with these 3 Unions) we give importance to all 3 Unions same.Wage settlement of Workers for 5 years is due from 01.08.2012. First 3 Union have forwarded their "Charter of Demand" to us and accordingly we are negotiating with these 3 unions & we are also meeting with Conciliation Officer in Govt.Labour office. but suddenly we have received one "Charter of Demand" Letter through post of 4th Union related to AITUC ( which was like as dead since its registration)& asked to parcipate with 3 Unions for wage settlement. a Group of 4-5 workers also given this Letter to Govt.Labour office.Govt Labour office without any inquiry asked to us why not negotiating with this union.we have requested to Govt.Labour officer to ask them (AITUC) about their membership but Govt.Labour officer is saying that you should negotiation with this union also along with other (3) unions.
Now our query is
Can Govt.Labour Officer( Conciliation officer) direct us to negotiate with this Union?
if yes then what is remedy.
what type of step should we taken so that this Union can't enter in negotiation.
Thanks
Sudhir Tiwari
chitra gupta
15 September 2012 at 18:29
avery interesting real case in a psu *the disciplinary authority finally restarted thepreliminary enquiry after 5yrs(removing the biased io and po also) but did not inform the suspended employee anything.the disciplinary authority is not payiny the suspended employee subsistance allowance for the last 55 months.the suspended employee has been denied subsistance allowance.is it not denial of defenceto be taken (and gurranted under the constitution) by the suspended employee. he requested payment first and stay on the proceedings.....but it was not granted by the present io as he told that he is not drawing and disbursing officer. now how we will tackle this peculiar situation in socialist india with democracy......a real facts ....plz give ur expart opinion to save the family of the ill fated employee thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Service cases at supreme court directly
This has reference to the news conference on Monday by the society of SC in regard to middle class income group can get case argued in SC. Please confirm whether any employee can file a case against a company with Hon'ble Supreme Court (SC Society) instead of going to local / regional labour court / civil court directly.
Thanks and regards,
L N Das