J Gupta
19 May 2015 at 10:00
SIR
THE UNDERSIGNED WHO IS WORKING UNDER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT,WAS COMMUNICATED ADVERSE APAR FOR 2013-14 ON 30-9-2014. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS REPRESENTED AGAINST IT ON 12-10-2014 .TILL NOW NO REPLY HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT.
KINDLY LET ME KNOW WHAT IS THE LAST DATE TILL WHICH I CAN APPROACH CAT. MY REASON FOR ASKING THIS IS, ACTUALLY I WANT TO DELAY THE CASE AS LONG AS POSSIBLE.
KIND REGARDS
k karuppasamy
19 May 2015 at 09:51
I am working in a CPSU and I was received a interview letter from SPSU with higher pay. This case I am not having exp. which asked by SPSU and I have not forwarded the application through proper channel can I attent the interview.
sumitkumar
18 May 2015 at 19:19
I want to ask whether one can take probation(Dept) and Hindi exam while he is on leave.
Not joined new posting even after joining time (relieved from previous post) due to some personal problems. Can I write probation exam in this condition.
Subrata
18 May 2015 at 16:27
Sir, I dismissed from bank on October,2010 but I got PF, Gratuity & getting pension also. Recently IBA declare that CRS employees are eligible to get Leave Encashment. Can I eligible to get Leave Encashment?
SUBRATA
shekhar sharma
17 May 2015 at 20:55
Sir for central govt employees under NPS ,is there any rule/law which instruct to the deptts to deposit NPS contribution to PFRDA with in certain time frame afterwards deptt is liable to pay any interest or compensation?
in practice promotion given with retroespecyive dates and due arrears are given but in altered NPS senario, is govt bound to give interest/ compensation on NPS contribution arrears as not providing and depositing timely NPS contribution can affect signifacantly pension afterwards.
arindamghosh
17 May 2015 at 13:47
I got a job in dop as postal assistant through direct recruitment examination 2013-14.My result was published on 22/12/14. I received intimation letter on 7/1/15. After the completion of all pre appointment formalities I got my appointment letter on 29/4/15 and said that our in house training will be started from 1/5/15.This letter was issued from my Division on 24/4/15. In the meantime an order from directorate of post dated 27/4/15 stated that no new appointment letter can be issued till further order.Due to this order our division postponed our joining. Till now we have no news regardig the abeyance.since 29/4/15 joining of postal assistants have been stopped in many states due to this order. What should I do now please suggest.
sudhir chaudhary
17 May 2015 at 10:06
I had joined a company 6 months ago as a Graduate Engineer Trainee. Currently I am on probation period. My probation period is 1 year. In this duration my notice period is 1 month.
Now before coming to my query, I would like to share that there is salary problem in my company and our salary is delaying 2-3 months.
Now I want to pursue master degree. So for its entrance exam preparation I am not going to company since 15 days without resignation or any intimation to company for leave, because I know they won't sanction my leave (my 2 months salary is also pending with company).
Now company has sent me NOTICE for EXPLANATION AND RESUME DUTY.
In this notice they have mentioned that if I don't resume my duty in 4 days, then they may take legal action against me.
So what should I do now ???
As I don't want to continue my job neither my Notice period. So in worst possible case what they can do ???
Can they claim their notice period (1 month) damage money in this condition ??
As my 2 months salary is already with them.
Whose hand will be upper in this scenario ???
R.Ramesh
16 May 2015 at 16:17
Dear Sir,
What components should be compulsory as per law in preparing salary structure.
Thanking you,
Ramesh
D Nanda Kumar
15 May 2015 at 19:39
JGD
CHAPTER 1
1. Due to the filing of the case by CBI my result in the promotion process in 1993 was kept in sealed cover. Since such CBI cases are long drawn, a provision for giving adhoc promotion was introduced in 1993 as amendment to Promotion policy. As per the same, review committee is to be formed by the Chairman & Managing Director every six months to review cases more than 2 years old to consider giving adhoc promotion.
The action of the Bank in this regard and the inaction of the Chairman & Managing Director are as under:
Action Result Inaction (by CMD)
Note put up on 28.07.1995
& first committee formed Due to sudden demise of one of the committee members review was not done. NO INVOLVEMENT
Second committee was formed on 06.09.1995 and review was done on 30.11.1995 Note recommending adhoc promotion was submitted to CMD. Marked to “ED” and on “ED’s” transfer to another Bank the note is consigned to the records.
Third committee was formed on 15.06.1999. Step 1
The committee asked for details of the case from the Vigilance dept. & personnel dept. (Ref. Notes dated 13.06.2000, 29.07.2000) and reported to CMD vide note dated 24.08.2000.
CMD raised 3 queries viz. The present status, reason for Bank not taking action against me & how terminal benefits given to other Officer mentioned in the case etc. And made a remark as under:
ED may examine these points as well as other aspects of the long pending issue and put up with his comments at the earliest.
Step 2
On getting satisfactory report from Vigilance & Personnel departments the committee met on 13.09.2000 and a note dated 21.09.2000 recommending adhoc promotion was submitted to CMD.
Please discuss.
Step 3
Note explaining the process with due recommendation of the Chief Vigilance Officer put up on 20.10.2000.
Remark by CMD:
Did we make any specific reference to CBI in respect of Mr. Nandakumar (& Mr. Pushkar Raj) seeking No objection of the CBI for promotions to these Officers.
Step 4
Note dated 07.11.2000 was put up with reply to the query duly signed by GM (per.) & GM(Vig.) (that at the discretion of the Bank the Officers can be given adhoc promotion & that the CBI is not concerned with the internal decision of the Bank)
Remark by GM(Vig.):
As directed by Chairman to discuss the matter, I discussed the same with him on 23.11.2000. Based on the position obtaining up to date, it is considered that this could be re-examined at the time of the next Review of Sealed Covers Procedure or next promotion process.
Papers returned for the needful at Personnel Deptt. Pl.
(Needless to add that the CMD was to retire very soon & no review committee was formed in his tenure)
Fourth committee was formed and put up a note dated 18.06.2001 Recommended adhoc promotion from the date of signing of the note by CMD. There is no remark whatsoever on the note by the CMD based on the copy provided to me under RTI Act, 2005.
Fifth committee was formed by CMD on 20.12.2007.
(This is the last committee formed for review not only for my case but in general also although statutorily a review of all cases need to be done every six months) Step 1
The committee called for the personal information by letter dated 18.01.2008 regarding
1. Assignments and duties performed
2. Achievement of allocated targets,
3. Exemplary achievements outside the Bank, &
4. Overall performance.
On getting a very satisfactory report these for two decades of my service, the committee finalized the findings on 07.03.2008 recommending once again adhoc promotion.
The Chairman & Managing Director signed the report on 08.03.2008 with comments for discussion with Committee & General Manager (HR) (as per reply to my RTI query).
Note:
I was personally informed by the then GM (legal) who attended the said meeting that Chiarman & Managing Director voiced his concern as to how the person (myself) is tolerating the injustice for so long and not yet gone to court. The GM(Legal) &/or GM(Per) present was asked to personally convey his feelings to me (to go to court). It is once again needless to mention that the CMD was due for retirement in December, 2008 by which time no court decision is likely to come.
1. Based on the documents already obtained by me under RTI act 2005 I filed writ petition in the High Court of Bombay and obtained a judgement by the bench on 01.10.2008 directing the CMD to take a decision within 8 weeks. (Writ petition no. 1614 of 2008 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1247211) . The same CMD had to act for a change.
2. The Chairman & Managing Director had also the privilege of reading the following remark in the said judgement which I feel is a personal remark calling for introspection:
“Even otherwise a duty is cast on the Respondents to act fairly. The petitioners’ case has not been reviewed in terms of the Regulations. Where a power is conferred on an authority, the authority conferred with the power has a corresponding duty to act and that too fairly.”
From the above it is clear that there is a dereliction of duty and gross denial of justice. The Bank released the adhoc promotion as per the judgement but not from the date of judgement as recommended in the note but from the date 24.11.2008 there by robbing me of any monetary benefits.
3. After getting the relief & after putting in a satisfactory service of 38 & odd years, I attained superannuation on 31.03.2010 and retired with full terminal benefits including pension.
CHAPTER 2
The case no. 6 of 1992 stands disposed off now and as per judgement dated 26.03.2014 I stand acquitted on merits. I have made claims on the Bank by letter addressed to the Chairman & Managing Director submitted on 16.07.2014 and thereafter sent reminders on 1.10.2014, 18.10.2014, 12.11.2014, 24.12.2014, 30.12.2014, 23.01.2015, 02.02.2015, 28.03.2015, 14.04.2015 and 28.04.2015 staking my claims for the following:
a. Release/regularization of adhoc promotion with notional date from the date of promotion
b. For considering my claim for future promotions denied to me by the Bank’s action/non action ,
c. Adequate monetary compensation from the Bank to mitigate the injustice, ignominy and mental agony as well as trauma I was put through by action & non action of the Bank
Representation dated 11.07.2014 and several reminders have been blatantly ignored despite my age (65 years) and health condition (Cancer Survivor).
Further, it is also mentioned in the said High Court judgement (mentioned in the first chapter) that “Needless to say that subsequently, if the Petitioner is exonerated or discharged or acquitted from the charges, the Petitioner’s promotion would be considered in terms of the rules in force pertaining to sealed cover procedure.
THE NON ACTION CONTINUES DESPITE THE ABOVE DIRECTION (WHICH ACCORDING TO ME TANTAMOUNTS TO CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER).
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
How I clame my pending salary
Company give me the notice for leave the company but my 5 month salary not paid so I want to know how I got my pending salary.