G Kishore Advocate
12 February 2016 at 13:08
Dear Concerns,
One of client had been selected in AP Models schools for PGT commerce in Nov 2014, he completed certificate verifications, later he had been placed at Nandyal, while issuing of appointment letter they stopped to issue the same due to his PG qualification is against to the notification...His qualification is MFM from pondicheryy University, in notification said PG qualification is not mentioned any where...while my client try to get the equalent certificate to M.com...later he cames to know that in the year 2006 MFm was changed to M.com finance as per UGC directions...client was passed his MFM in 2010...university had issued the
letter clearly...even after submitting to APMS...they saying the same issue...I need to file the case in high court...can i get the expert in service matter advocate in Tirupathi...
rajrsh yadav
11 February 2016 at 22:45
Respected sir
This happened to me on 13th jan 2016 when i was called to meet the managers( Regional manager Varun sharma and General manager Kishor sharma )
But before going any further I want to tell everyone that I belong to a lower class family and to support my family I joined kamath Natural Pvt.Ltd.(Natural Ice Cream Juhu Scheme ) on 15yh july 2014 .
I Want to share how some financially powerful managers abuse and bully their employees .
So on 13 jan 2016 in CP store my manager asked me if I know what should one has to do to become a manager .I told them that one has to possess every information about the store. They then proceeded and said that some theft has been taking place since some days. I told that sorry I have no knowledge about this . Then they started abusing me and asked me to write the names of some of my colleagues otherwise we will consider that you are the theif and will destroy your career and your future . Out of fear I wrote the names ( I know I should have acted strongly) .
Now on 14 jan 2016 they called me and my colleagues ( vikas , Prashant , and Roshan pandey ) again and locked us for 3 hours in CP store .
They abused us constantly and forced us to sign the resigning letter and threatened us that otherwise they will call the police , they have connections with them and with the help of money they will ask the police to lock us against theft charges .
Out of fear we all resigned . we have a complaint copy. but still no one is ready to lodge our FIR despite many rounds .
Today was the hearing at labour Commission there also we got the salary for 6 days only .
they are not ready to give any claim to us .
I want your support and any suggestions you want to give us regarding this case so we can take the appropriate actions
b kumar chsndrs
11 February 2016 at 19:48
sir told tha t Since you have completed HS after your application of employment at both SER & ER, it will not be an issue.
It will be a crime if you had completed HS prior to your employment application and suppressed the same to your employer at the time of you submitting your job applicatiuon .can it problems. how I recover its.
abcd1234
11 February 2016 at 17:31
Can a person working for us with retainer be eligible to become Factory manager? it is a pharma company.
Please let me know - if it is mentioned anywhere? which section?
suneetha Jain
11 February 2016 at 09:44
Sir, Is non disclosure of pending criminal case at the time of appointment lead to termination of government or banking sector?? I want to ask this question becasue now a days so many innocent people are falsely included in cases due to political or financial influences especially in Marriage related issues. What is the stand of our courts regarding this??
Rajeswariii
10 February 2016 at 15:13
My friend, who joined with State Bank of India as Probationary officer in Mar 2011 was terminated in Jun 2013 even after extending his probation in Apr 2013.The reason cited is he has not disclosed a pending case (Marriage related)against him. The case is settled in Jan 2013 in Lok Adalat.He has got a notice by SBI in Dec 2012 reg the case and Case is settled in Lok adalat as compromise in Jan 2013. The details are submitted by him to Bank.Later, after extending probation in Apr 2013, he is terminated in Jun 2013.
Probation is for a period of 2 years. After completion of 2 yrs probation period, Bank extended the probation citing a ground that the candidate has to improve the subject but not on the ground of the case. Later after extension of probation, within 1 month, service is terminated. The case is a false case Under Sec 417,420 Under sec 34 and also under sec 3,4 of Dowry prohibition act(resolved in Jan 2013 in Lok adalat)
The case came to the notice of SBI while making enquiry about antecedents. The judgement is given by lok adalat is a compromise award is given between two parties and the case is closed. The termination notice contained details of the sections of the case. But, it didn't mention about the case in extension letter given in Apr 2013."
The Bank gave a show cause notice regarding the pending case on 10.12.2012 giving a deadline of 31.12.2012 to answer. My friend replied on 31.12.2012 to give one month time to submit proofs defending his version. Accordingly, he got the case resolved in Lok adalat on 29.01.2013 and submitted the proof and explanation on 07.02.2013. Later, on 02.04.2013, he was given an extention of probation letter indicating that his performance need to improve. No information relating to show cause and his explanations. Later after one month, on 03.05.2013, he was issued a termination order with one month notice mentioning the show cause letter. No mention is given about the probation extention letter.
I came to know that Hon’ble Chandigarh High Court (Punjab & Haryana) Justice Sri Kuldeep Singh gave a judgement around 23.12.2015 in the case of Amandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab that non disclosure of pending case should not lead to termination.
My friend already filed a suit in High Court in June 2013 and the case is still pending. He told me that he got to know about Amandeep Singh case which was related to his case. In Amandeep case, the judge reportedly told that non disclosure of pending case at the time of appointment is not a valid reason for termination
My friend has filed a suit in Jun 2013 for stay. But, court dinot give stay but accepted the case. From then to till date, the case did not reach the judge. The lawyer said he will close the case once it reaches the judge
The Lawyer assured of closing the case once it reaches the Judge. But, we have to be aware of previous judgments before hand so that we can add some more input to the efforts made by the lawyer. as the case is do or die situation for my friend, I asked for your help regarding sending me the copy of judgement pertaining to Amandeep singh case.
sanjay cholle
10 February 2016 at 14:30
dear sir, i hv joined an educational institute on 20/12/2004, i hv been given appointment orders every academic year seperately as an adhoc staff.dates on appointment orders are as: 3/1/2005,2/7/2005 (valid upto 31/5/2006)30/06/2006,2/7/2006,16/06/2008. after this no order is issued, then institute closed on 30/04/2012. my question is am i eligible to claim for gratuity?
plz help.
Durgesh sharma
10 February 2016 at 11:57
Dear Sir,
We have sent one legal notice on 13th jan'2016 still not received any reply from the employer wat we will do now.
Prabh
09 February 2016 at 12:51
As per factories act 1948 maximum daily working hour is 8 and maximum weekly working hours is 48. my question is this working include lunch and tea breaks?
At present we are working 8.5 hours in one of shift other two shift are 8 hours and 7.5 hour including 30 min lunch break. is this against labour law?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non disclosure of pending case at the time of appointment lead to termination??
Sir, I request the advocates (Except Sri Dhingra & Sri Rajendra Goyal) Is non disclosure of pending criminal case at the time of appointment lead to termination of government or banking sector?? I want to ask this question becasue now a days so many innocent people are falsely included in cases due to political or financial influences especially in Marriage related issues. What is the stand of our courts regarding this??