Suresh C Mishra
22 November 2009 at 22:18
Sir, Prilinary issue about fairness of enq. by employer who will lead first ? Judgement on this ?
Anonymous
22 November 2009 at 20:02
we had taken workmen compensation from a insurance co. showing salary of Rs. 4000/- per month to each worker. But the actual salary now exceeds from this amount. Please advice me that in the cicumstances we may claim wc from insurance company because due to above mentioned differences they may refuse for claim
chayan
22 November 2009 at 18:23
A Government company has gone into Members voluntary winding up in 2001 in voluntary winding up mode and one of the Govt. official has been appointed as Liquidator to complete the liquidation process. At present company is in advanced stage of liquidation. I am working in this company on contract basis since then. Account of the Liquidator is yet to be submitted to the Hon'ble Court for appointing of Official Liquidator. My question is whether Liquidator is liable to pay PF and Gratuity to its employees who have served more than eight years on contractual terms.
Anonymous
21 November 2009 at 21:21
My uncle has paid some advance to a person to provide labour for his work. That person provided the labour but after working for 2 months they filed a case of bonded labour against my uncle. they were sent back to their home (somewhere in UP) by the govt. authority. actually they were not bonded. now they have the advance money. How can we recover our money.
dhiraj choudhary
20 November 2009 at 16:55
i hav 2 file a petition before c.a.t. against d order of termination of my client as 'mazdoor" from m.e.s.,who was on probation upto aug 2006 but thereafter no formal order of extension of his probation period was passed by d authorities.the services of my client was terminated on d ground that he has obtained a false character certificate from police regarding his conduct coz. a criminal case was pending against him at that n he didnt mention it n was terminated with out issuance of showcause notice or charge sheet n no regular inquiry was conducted n in d name of inquiry statement of my client was recoreded.now d question is that wheteher my is entitled 2 the protection of art.311(2) i.e opporunity of being heard coz my client was on probation n no formal order of his confirmation was issued n can d so called aforementioned inquiry tak d place of regular inquiry if not then suggestions alongwith latest case law if any.with thanks in advance
dhiraj choudahry
adv.
Anonymous
20 November 2009 at 16:19
Even though there is no outstanding dues to be recovered and no disciplinary proceedings is pending or contemplated against the retiree about 50% of Retirement Gratuity has been kept withheld by the Sanctioning
Authority for one year.Is it legal? What is the effect of Ex-Parte order obtained by a private unknown person for recovery of money alleged to be paid to the retiree as loan without any permission of the Employer?
hemant
20 November 2009 at 13:26
Dear Sir,
I want to know the defination of "all consequential benefits". What benefits inclued in all consequential benefits.
hemant
20 November 2009 at 13:25
Dear Sir,
I want to know the defination of "all consequential benefits". What benefits inclued in all consequential benefits.
Rafeeque
19 November 2009 at 17:06
Greetings of the Day to you All!!
My Query is :- What all components of One's CTC are to taken for encashment of Earned Leave...: (a) While in Service and (b) On Separation.
Industry Practices are mixed... I am looking for directive in line with any legal/Statutory Provision OR any CASE LAW.
Pls share.
Regards
Rafeeque
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
who will lead evidence first in domestic enq. before L.C.
Sir, Prilinary issue about fairness of enq. by employer who will lead first ? Judgement on this ?