anil verma (registeronlyfree)
26 April 2013 at 22:59
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?
ANAND T MALUSARE
26 April 2013 at 22:29
My appointment is on deputation for one year. After completion of one year absorption order is issued later by 2 months and made absorbed in the present department ( Maharashtra Government) . My query is about seniority ....
a. which date will be consider for seniority ( joining date in parent department, joining date on deputation, date of completion of deputation period or date of absorption order)
b. services of the parent department is considerable for seniority
c. what are the term for seniority of the deputationiest.
vaibhav jain
26 April 2013 at 21:44
could some body please tell me about no. of national Labour commissions & their recommendations.
In dire need, will be grateful for help
Tricia Thiel
26 April 2013 at 15:05
WOuld someone be able to advise me on the correct procedure that should be followed when someone is not meeting their work performance requirements in a professional service role? Can someone be dismissed for this and what process needs to be followed. Thank you.
rajamanikam
26 April 2013 at 14:15
sir, im working in a public sector bank as a asst manager, i had applied to a govt(central govt) job before getting confirmation (probation period), as the process for getting NOC got delayed i applied with out NOC and Now i got selected for that govt job. I also got the NOC from my admin.
khokan majumdar
25 April 2013 at 21:52
Respected sir,
one production worker got his right foot 2/3
amputed because of disease hence his job is
hard so referred for civil surgeon's opinion.
civil surgeon declared him fit with a remarks
of rt.foot amputed.now management wants him to leave the job with some compensation on
welfare ground as his physical deformity is
not attributed to company job.how far this act of termination is legally justified? pl.
advice.
Regards
khokan majumdar
venkatadri
25 April 2013 at 19:20
Dear Sirs,
I am told the Evidence Act is not Applicable in Labour Courts.
Th gentleman who opined this has said that as per the following Supreme Court Judgements he is right.
1. LLJ 1973 Vol-2 page 136
2. LLJ 1979 Vol-2 page 194/207
Damodar Valley Corp Vs Workmen
Shankar Chakravarthi vs Britannia Biscuits
Please confirm the above and oblige.
Regards,
Tina.
honey
25 April 2013 at 19:09
Dear sir/Madam
i am invoved in a case since 2011.Now the Hon'ble court has passed a order i.e,
" O R D E R
15.04.2013
1. This writ petition was admitted for hearing on 15.12.2011.
2. It is not possible to hear final arguments of regular matters
in the Admission Board considering that presently regular matters of the
years 1997-98 are going on and this is a writ petition of the year 2011.
In service matters issues are similar either of seniority/promotion or
monetary emoluments or disciplinary proceedings and the like. There is
no reason why people who have been silently waiting for their turn in
queue for years together should not be heard in their turn and later cases be given preference.
3. List in due course in the category of ?Regular Matters? as
per the year of its seniority."
Now I have a question towards this order
1).How much time it will take to final judgement??
2).Is there any other way to speed up this matter?
please provide me your expert comments on this matter.
Thanks & Regards
Honey
ramesh
25 April 2013 at 16:52
sir,
at the time of joining a contract company i had submitted my original mark sheets of 10th, diploma mark sheets. according to the contract they didn't give me salary so, i just quit from the contract but they refused to give back my certificates. what can i do for that sir? please take me to the correct decision....
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Slp ( civil) cc labour matters- dismissal pending summary trial proceedingsl
SLP PENDING PROCEEDINGS IN LABOUR COURT UNDER SUMMARY TRIAL BY REMAND ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
In one of my case, the hon'ble High court has remanded one of several issues framed before labour court to be decided afresh upholding rest of the award.
against this remand the employer has filed clarification application before High court which also has been rejected.
the summary trial proceedings are still pending before the labour court and the issue remanded is yet to be decided, the employer has filed SLP before the hon'ble supreme court, facts of which are not known.
are employer justified in filing SLP during pendency of summary trial yet to be concluded.
the high has held 80 % award in my favour. pl suggest me what to do and how to counter the said act of the employer?