Lavanya LDC
27 May 2018 at 13:37
Sir,
I have joined Central government service, last 5 years back claiming OBC as my caste in Tamilnadu as BC.
My grandfather migrated from Kerala to Tamilanadu last 40 years back. In Kerala my grand father was ST and he lost the ST caste certificate proofs. Last one year back my father found One Xerox copy (Proof of Document) as my grandfather belonging to ST.
Due to lack of proof of documents, after expiry of my grand father, my father enrolled as BC in Tamilanadu during 1970s, so that, I have claimed BC Status and got the Central Govt Employment. Now my father approaching the MRO in Kerala and claiming ST Status. In this case, how to protect myself as I have not submitted any false caste certificate to Govt Authorities.
Kindly suggest.
Lavanya.
Anonymous
27 May 2018 at 10:22
Hi All,
My wife is working in Pvt Ltd firm, having total 11 members , out which 9 are permanent working employees and 2 of them are directors.
When she asked for maternity benefits , there CA refuse that, stating the reason for maternity benefits there should be at least 10 permanent working employees at that time excluding directors of the company.
Can someone please confirm is this is correct statement in terms of maternity benefits and is there any way to challenge them
Thanks
Santhosh Kumar
27 May 2018 at 01:54
The mode of assessment in our office for scientists changed from time bound to flexible complimenting scheme and finally to modified flexible complementing scheme w.e.f. June 2014. However, timely DPCs have not taken shape citing administrative delay, due to which several senior officers who stood good chances for career upgradation have failed to get opportunity. Senior officers (3 Nos.) approached CAT for relief, that their assessment be carried out as per old scheme and given a verdict for implementation within six months. The office failed to implement the same within stipulated time. Now, Ministry approached High Court to challenge verdict of CAT, because of which assessment of about 85 Nos. of officers is held up.
Qn.: Is there any way out that assessment of 85 Nos. of Officers be carried out, while the case of 3 Nos. of Senior officers vs. Union of India is not settled. Like any sealed cover procedure option!
RK
26 May 2018 at 17:25
Good Evening Sirs !
I am working in a State co-operative bank which is registered under Registrar of Co-operative societies and the bank is following CCS rules for bank employees. I was applied for paternity leave for 15 days on 07.05.2018 whereas, God has blessed me with a baby boy on 10.05.2018.
On 08.05.2018 the management had issued a circular that the management decided to discontinue the paternity leave due to shortage of staff. In fact, there is no shortage of staff in the bank.
Kindly advice me in this regard please
Thanks in advance
yours truly
Ravi Kumar
Jaswanth Adapa
26 May 2018 at 07:53
TSSPDCL has recently conducted exam for the Post of Junior Accounts Officer for 100 Marks (Part A for 80 marks and Part B for 20 Marks).
I have got 70 Marks (56 Marks in Part A and 14 Marks in Part B) and I was ranked 93rd. My Date of Birth is 22.05.1987
For the same 70 Marks, a Candidate whose Date of Birth is 30.07.1995 was given 69th Rank, becasue he scored better marks than me in Part A. (His scoring was Part A 62 marks and 8 Marks in Part B).
As per my understanding and time tested principle, which is usually adopted by UPSC/ TSPSC or any other Institiution in case of a Tie of Marks is that, The Person who is Older in Age is given better rank than Candidate whose is younger.
But in my case, first preference in ranking was given to that candidate who secured better marks in Part A , instead of Age being given first preference.
Had the Selection of Candidates been made on the Basis of Age (in case of equal marks), I would stand a chance to get Selected and find a place in the Selection List.
Even the Notification inviting application for the Job, never mentioned the fact that Weightage will be Given to Part A while ranking Students. Not even the Service Regulations of TSSPDCL speaks about Tie Breaking Principle.
Very recently I have got to know that the entire Selection Procedure (including Certification Verification, Executing Bond etc) has been completed by TSSPDCL and is in the process of issuing Appointment Letters in a day or two.
During these Vacations, my Case could not be accepted by the Telangana High Court, because Service Matters were not taken up by the Judge.
In View of the above Situation,
1. I would like to know my Legal Position.
2. What is the Settled Law Position with respect to giving priority to age over marks in Part A.
3. Do I stand a chance in getting/ winning this case and secure a seat in TSSPDCL.
4. Do I need to worry because the entire Selection Procedure will get over, by the time Courts Resume on 04.06.2018.
I am giving links to the following for reference, as i am unable to attach the same.
1. Notification: https://www.tssouthernpower.com/ShowProperty/CP_CM_REPO/Pages/Careers/Direct%20Recruitment%20to%20JAO
2. Merit List: https://www.tssouthernpower.com/ShowProperty/CP_CM_REPO/Pages/Careers/JAO%20Results%20Qualified
3. Service Regulations adopted by TSSPDCL: http://apsebea.org/files/APSEB%20Service%20Regulations%20final.pdf
Any help is highly Appreciated !!
Anonymous
24 May 2018 at 02:08
I worked as an intern for a company for a month during December, 2017. It was clearly mentioned in the offer letter that I will be paid a stipend of Rs. 2000/month. Right now, the company is denying me to pay any stipend. What can I do in this case?
Anonymous
23 May 2018 at 14:50
I m working with a private school in haryana from past one year as tgt science.
My probation period started on 10 april '17 nd supposed to be ended by 10 april '18.
But In the last week of march 2018, i was asked to resign which i denied and asked them to terminate me.
But the school refused to terminate me and extended by probation till 31st may 2018 verbally.
Now again they are asking me to resign forcibly to which i again asked them to give me termination.
I just wish to know the cbse rules nd regulation for termination of a teacher during her probation period.
Abhay Kumar Sethia
23 May 2018 at 14:38
Dear Sir/Madam,
I was working with a Partners ship firm of leading business group, from 18.7.17 to 21.3.18 with starting salary of 20000 and revised salary 25000 from the Nov 2017. There is nothing provided in the appointment letter about the BONUS. The important fact is that while we are calculating the TDS on salary We are taking 8.33% of last year pay as bonus for each and every employee, and that calculated bonus has been claimed as the salary expenses in the profit and losses. Then please tell me Am I eligible for bonus? And now a question is pending, how we will deal with the increased salary from Nov 2017 from 20000 to 25000. my total salary Rs 142070 after ESIC deduction for the above period, It is a very polite request to please help me to arrived at the final figure of the bonus to be placed before the past employers.
Dear Sir/Madam,
It not a same query but I am waiting for you reply on 2 question as follows.
1. Please tell me Am I eligible for bonus? because my past employer is not interested to release my bonus.
2. how we will deal with the increased salary from Nov 2017 from 20000 to 25000. because I have put the FINAL figure of bonus to employer, otherwise as per employer I will only get Rs. 7000 as a minimum bonus only.
Please guide me.
shobhit saraswat
22 May 2018 at 21:56
Sir
My gratuity is wrongly calculated by ALC agra it did not add my AGP in my basic salary by this cause my basic is being wrongly calculated by him
Kindly suggest me the need full
Do by any law i request him to correct his order
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Copy of application
A case has been filed in the Principal CAT in N.Delhi by a group of pensioners. Some other pensioners who are not part of this group want to know how the case has been filed. Is it possible for them to obtain a copy of the application by filing a request for it in CAT?