KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
15 September 2008 at 12:10
Dear Members,
I am in urgent need of the following Judgments
2003 STPL DC 117 M.P., between Surendra Singh Vs. Shanker Joshi, Date of Judgment is 29-10-2002.
2004 STPL(DC) 322 P & H between M/s Kumar Rubber Industries Vs. Sohan Lal, Date of Judgment is 14-09-2001.
If any of our member are having, please send me copy of the Judgment either by courier, e-mail, for which act I shall be grateful to them. I undertake to pay costs of zerox and courier charges by depositing the required amount into their bank account.
My address:
K.VENKATESH GUPTA
ADVOCATE
H.No: 1-1-16/1/2/A
JAWAHARNAGAR, RTC CROSS ROADS
HYDERABAD - 500 020 (A.P.)
PH.No: 9885808021/040-27650240.
E-Mail: venkateshgupta_kande@yahoo.co.in
N.K.Assumi
15 September 2008 at 12:01
The question is whether a man who knows that he has gonorrhoea, and who by having intercourse with his wife, who does not know it, infects her,is or is not guilty under section 324 or 326 of the Indian penal code.
KamalNayanSaxena
14 September 2008 at 21:33
Under what circumstances a traffic inspector can seize driving license?
N.K.Assumi
14 September 2008 at 09:51
If a Receiver appointed by the civil court commit a criminal act, can he be prosecuted without any sanction from the court appointing him?
salilkumarp
13 September 2008 at 19:10
two accused persons were tried for an offence u/s 379 r/w 34 ipc. 2 nd accused was im- plicated on the basis of an alleged confession of 1 st accused.how far ths confession admissible, especially when recovery was effected from 1 st accused ?
salilkumarp
13 September 2008 at 19:03
whether source of income is relevant in 138 NI act ?
whether it is the burden of complainant to prove that he had sufficient income to lend to the accused ?
any rulings in this respect ?
N.K.Assumi
13 September 2008 at 13:53
Accused went to petrol pump station and asked the man to fill the petrol. The man filled the petrol and after that the accused went away with his car without payment.Will it be a case of thief?
salilkumarp
13 September 2008 at 13:22
ACCUSED WAS A LADY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS CHARGED U/S 381 IPC.SHE WAS FOUND GUILTY AND A REPORT OF THE PROBATION OFFICER WAS CALLED FOR. PROBATION OFFICER GAVE REPORT STATING THE PATHETIC CONDITION OF THE ACCUSED, IN ALL RESPECTS ,AND PLEADED FOR COURT"S MERCY. BUT THE COURT OVERRIDED THE REPORT AND SENTENCED THE LADY TO 3 YEARS RI.
WHETHER THE SENTENCE LEGAL ?
WHAT IS HER REMEDY AT APPELLATE STAGE ?
Member Strength 9,48,176 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bail u/s 437 Cr.P.C.
Can a megistrate grant bail in cases which are punishable with life imorisonment U/S 437 Cr.P.C.?