Jainodin shaikh
16 January 2009 at 19:40
In a private complaint against police officers; after directing the complainant to lead evidence and after recording the evidence, the court ordered the police to file a report u/s 202 of Cr.P.C. and concerned police despite of several reminders sent by the court; not submitting the report since last 4 month. The complainant moved an application for conducting the enquiry through an advocate(third party). But the court put the matter for waiting the report from the police who are the accused. What remedy is available for the complainant?
Legal Fighter
16 January 2009 at 09:27
how does time limitation apply to an FIR u/s 498/406 which is under investigation and the accused is on interim bail for past more than 2 years. most of the incidents mentioned in the FIR have already been more than 3 years old. does it mean that if the police takes 1 more year to file chargesheet, the case will be barred due to time limitation. Or this time limitation is not applicable to the priod of investigation or the Anticipatory Bail proceedings which are already going on in high court.
kindly help me understnading time limitation u/s 468 CrPC.
Jainodin shaikh
15 January 2009 at 22:52
Is it compulsory to comply with the provision of sec. 207 of Cr.P.C. (regarding to supply of documents and statements recorded in inquiry to the accused person) in a private complaint not excusively triable by the Cour of Sessions?
S.B.adil rahman
15 January 2009 at 21:41
The apex court decided the case of sanction for the prosecution of a public servant vide the below referred case on 7.1.2009. Can any one post the text of the judgement/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2009
@ S.L.P. (Crl.) NO.2864 of 2007
Choudhury Parveen Sultana Vs. State of West Bengal and Another
ALTAMAS KABIR, J. & MARKANDEY KATJU, J.
Dated : 07.01.2009
adil/Kolkata
M.S.Chandra Shekar
15 January 2009 at 13:14
A Exhibit in favour of the Defendent was manipulated in a Civil Case by the Registration Department. The civil case was decreed against the defendant. After that a Complaint to the CID was filed during 1980's, then the CID took up the case and due to some excuse from the registration depatment that the records are in some other court, the investigation was closed.
In 2007 the same exhibit was challenged by the Defendant in the High Court, The Registration Department failed to contest and the Hon'ble High Court gave the order in favour of the defendant/petitioner.
Now I (Defendant / petitioner) have filed a complaint to CID that there investigation was never complete and again ask them to conduct the investigation.
The CID Department in the current year comes out with a reply that they are not responsible to investigate Civil Matters.
Is this statement of CID Deparment is correct ?
kanwar Lal
15 January 2009 at 10:10
customer issued cheque of Rs 100000 to bank official but same was dishonourd due to reason "Refer to Drawer".
Can we file complaint u/s 138 against the cusotmer. Plz refer sny latest judgement.
What's the meaning of Refer to Drawer.
Satish
14 January 2009 at 23:01
Hi All,
I'm new to this forum.
I want to ask whether "stop payment" of the cheque is covered under 138 NIAct?
I mean to say may I file a case U/s 138 NIAct against Stop Payment?
R Bajaj
13 January 2009 at 21:03
Sir,
I am investigating a case where one of officer has complained that he has been manhandled by another officer and he wants me to record the statement of his wife who was present at the scene.
my question:
Is this a valid proof for a crime to have been committed?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SUspicious FIR
There was a compliant given at all women police station. Before interrogation I have got AB from high court. Interrogation happended, statements were recorded from both the sides. Registration of FIR is postponed. After one month FIR is registered based on another statement(? or complaint) dated one month after the first complaint. New facts were revealed in the second statement.
It is confusing the way FIR is registered.
1. Did the high court secure a copy of first complaint while granting AB.
2. Why there are 2 statements recorded on the complainant side. The first complaint was given by my wife's father, a statement givne by wife. The seocnd was given by my wife herself.
3.Is that a possibility that the first was withdrawn at the police level itself without going to court. Is that legal.
Please clarify