Anonymous
10 June 2010 at 10:00
1. The accused has appeared before the court twice but thereafter has failed to appear.
2. Can the case continue with the lawyer only appearing on behalf of the accused.
3. Is it necessary for the accused to appear everytime
4. What will the magistrate order in case the accused fails to appear
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 23:44
hello experts,
pl. any one can provide me a citation/detail of judgment of supreme court that a F.I.R. can be lodge form any police station.
it is very very urgent.
Thanks in advance.
vinod bansal
09 June 2010 at 23:08
R/Experts
one tenant (possession Admitted by landlord) was forcibly dispossesed by landlord and his associates on gun point after entering forcibily in the tenanted premises of tenant,tenant got registered FIR u/ss 452/323/427/506 IPC and arms act against his landlord,what is legal preposition in given case in view of applicability of section 452 IPC against landlord.Thanx n Regards
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 19:09
I have filed a case of cheque dishonour u/s 138.
June 14th was fixed as the next date of hearing. I am informed by my lawyer that the judge on that day may be on leave.
What happens if the judge is on leave - is another date given or some one else hears the matter.
pawan kumar
09 June 2010 at 17:39
R/SIR is 120B IPC IS READ WITH 306 IPC?
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 16:24
Five years ago 498a booked in a PS not tried in court, next subsequent year again booked not tried, Two years later DV & compromised,This year 498a.
Meanwhile OP was put up against her before DV !!!!
Both husband,wife staying seperate around 3 months
But Wife would either bluff or refuse to accept the OP notice.
Is this sufficient to get OP (Divorce) or whats the best solution?
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 16:19
What would be normal court charges/fees in SC for quashing 498a? Typical time it would take in normal circumstances?
S K Sharda
09 June 2010 at 13:05
I was purchased a Shop in the year 2005 @ Rs.175000/-, All payment made through cheques (in favour of Mr. A (seller/agent) and DD in favored Mr. B actual land lord. Mr. A was fraudulently transferred this Shop in favour of his wife (Mrs. C) in absence of me (I was out of station).
After a long dispute Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C issued two cheques from their joint account, as security of Shop till transfer of ownership made in favour of me but neither he transfer the said shop in faveour of me nor made payment. When I contact to Mr. A he refused to do so and threatening to commit suicide and name to me. By this act Mr. A has the clear cut intentions from the very beginning to cheat me of the same property.
I was lodged a complaint against with local Police Station and after a mediation of police and mutual friends they agree to compromise and settle this matter.
Duly compromise in the meeting held with family members and friends, Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C agreed to pay Rs.425000/- for the cost of Shop where cost of shop is Rs. 9 Lacs, asked me to deposit the cheques with amount of Rs. 2 lacs and Rs. 2.25 Lacs.
Unfortunately both the cheques were returned unpaid due to “Payment Stopped by Drawer” I have filed a complaint suite u/s 138 NI Act against Mr. A.
Can I file a suite of against Mr. A and his wife Mrs. C.let me advise which sections will be applied in this case.
Anonymous
09 June 2010 at 12:53
please answer along with the relevant sections of CrPc and evidence act with full procedure.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Malafide police Action-Remedy
Sir,
Police Inspector falsely implicates a person and a charge sheet is filed in court.
Whether a complaint be filed against the police inspector for falsely implicating a person?
what is the procedure?
Should the trial in the court to be completed for filing the complaint against police?
Why should innocent suffer for years/decades together for the false implication?