Chetan
24 July 2010 at 21:40
One of the aunty of my clinet filed a Complaint before JMFC ynder the provisions of DV and Maintenance and Welfare of Sr. Citizens Act....
Whereas the mohe of my client issued a notice about partition but the aunty falsely filed criminal complaint aginst my client//
Whehter my client be held responsible for maintenance and welfare of that lady where as he his residing sepeatey since 35 yrs...
K.V.Deshpande
24 July 2010 at 21:26
If two members bench of supreme court hears a case and both have diverse opinions, whose decision will prevail
and if one of the judge is chief justice whose judgements prevails?
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 19:05
Que.1.Dear Experts, Please let me know whether 125 Cr.P.C is applicable only for maintenance cases or any more meaning to this section?
Que.2.In Case of Ex-pate Order under this section 125Cr.P.C, Does the wife is liable to send the Order copy to Respondent before going for Execution of Petition as the Order was done in the absence of respondent?
Anonymous
24 July 2010 at 17:13
AFTER THE SUBMISSION OF FINAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 169 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE,1973 THE COMPLAINANT CAN FILE PROTEST PETITION ?
dipankar
24 July 2010 at 15:18
can you please explain sec.389 IPC.I am unable to comprehend the explanation given by google.com
Kalyan Borpuzari
24 July 2010 at 12:55
At the time of the committal of the case to the session court, whether the lower court can take custody of the accused if he was earlier granted interim bail by that court on the basis of anticipatory bail granted to him? Please guide me with necessary case laws if any?
Siddharth Mehta
24 July 2010 at 01:38
sir i had a debate with a lawyer on facebook relating to hindutva
I am of a secular poin tof view and was just trying to change his narrow mindset..
The debate got a little bit heated (but i didnt say any offensive word or abuse the lawyer in any way)
He asked me the def of secularism and i told him to check Article25(2) of the indian constitution(which was the extent of my knowledge of law)
it is understood that he got very irritated with the debate and is now threatening me that he will take up the case with cyber crime cell and will see to it that im arrested
he says that i misquoted constitution with ulterior motive
Sir please check the link below of the discussion
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=-3&id=1043156960#!/photo.php?pid=31382710&id=1043156960&ref=notif¬if_t=photo_reply
sir please let me know have i seriously committed a crime or is he just threatening me cos of his arrogance??
vinod bansal
23 July 2010 at 21:59
R/Experts
I am representing to wife in a case of 125 crpc,in default of five month payment of maintainance,husband has spent total five month period in Jail on different -2 dates. Now i want to know that whether i can still recover maintainance amount for the period of five month for which he has already spent five month in Jail one month for each default of one month)or i have only remeady to file civil suit for recovery of the said amount of 5 months.Thanx
KAMARAJ BHARATHY G
23 July 2010 at 21:07
I would like to bring to your kind attention about the infructuous Illustration of section 108 A of Indian Penal Code. Section 108 A defines as “108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India. A person abets as offence within the meaning of this in Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.” The above mentioned section is enacted for the definition of an Abetment in India of offences outside India. This section has one Illustration as follows: “Illustration A, in India, instigates B, a foreigner in Goa, to commit a murder in Goa. A is guilty of abetting murder. “ In this Illustration it is mentioned that if one person from India instigates a foreigner, who is in Goa, to commit a murder in Goa, the person who instigates, is guilty of abetting murder. In this Illustration, Goa is shown as foreign territory. In fact, Goa was territory of Portugal at the time the Code was enacted and it continued up to 1961. Hence, at the time of enactment of this Code, this Illustration was apt. At this juncture, Goa has become territory of India in 1961. Once Goa became a part of India, the Illustration has become infructuous. But, unfortunately, the infructuous Illustration is continued for the past 49 years and the Infructuous Illustration is misleading the meaning of definition of the section 108 A of the Code. (G. KAMARAJ BHARATHY)DEAR FRIENDS PROVIDE YOUR COMENTS
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Information Technology Act
Dear experts,
Can anybody give me multiple choice questions with answers of the Information Technology Act?