Jeetendra singh
29 July 2010 at 23:22
In a session trial u/s:307 ipc, IO havn't filed the original copy of medical report of plaintiff instead this IO filed a attested copy of medical report. Kindly give the direction as well as case law in this matter.
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 21:50
MY UNCLES AND SISTER FILED A FALSE FIR AGAINST ME,SINGLE MOTHER OF 2 WITH NO FAMILY OR FRIENDS HERE. THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER CLOSED THE CASE AS -B-FILE,WHATEVER THAT IS...AND THE PP,THE ACP ALL SIGNED BUT THE DCP,WITHOUT WHOSE SIGN IT CANNOT GO TO COURT,HAS SENT IT DOWN AGAIN FOR RE INVESTIGATION. NOW WHAT CAN BE DONE...I AM FED UP OF BEING INNOCENT AND BEING ACCQUITTED TWICE,DOUBLE JEOPARDY,AS THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED IN SPAIN.
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 21:23
I want to know judgements supreme court judgements regarding 419,420469,471, when the prima facie is not found
vakkas
29 July 2010 at 20:12
A police officer of rank SI rebuked me and used indecent words in front of my parents in my absence. During this incident, i was in chennai. so, i send notice to the SI through a lawyer. But he refused to receive it.
I am studying LLB 2nd year.
How to file a criminal case against him?
pls guide me
Anonymous
29 July 2010 at 17:24
Respected Experts,
I want to have your legal advice for the following problem.
The land owners and a builder have executed an unregistered “Memorandum for Development Rights” in the year 2007 for the development of a land. Due to some government clearances, the said file has been pending for all these days and recently the owners have got clearance from the government.
After getting the said clearance, the owners have executed a Registered Partition deed for their respective shares, in the year 2010.Now the owners are not interested to give the said land for development to the builder, because of hiking of land values.
Now the builder wants to take both civil and criminal proceedings against the owners. And at the 1st instance, is there any possibility to go for a cheating case (Section 420 IPC) against the land owners? If so what he should do.
dipankar
29 July 2010 at 10:31
The word 'COMMIT' extortion in sec. 389 or sec.387 IPC MEANS the intention to commit or actually committed.Please guide.
Chetan
29 July 2010 at 08:19
That my client is residing with his neighbour relative (aunty)….. in last month his mother served notice to that lady for partition …… but recently the lady filed a complaint under Domestic Violence Act and The maintenance & welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizens Act and sought relief that not to disturb her peaceful possession against my client..How to defend such caseWhether the complaint is maintainable under the provisions of above Acts ?
Rajiv Batra
29 July 2010 at 02:04
IN PFA case complianant/witness has submitted forged documents during cross examination. I have filed application u/s 340. Reply is received and matter is fixed for arguments. Can an expert help me by refering a good citation to make my case strong
Regards
Rahul Singh
28 July 2010 at 22:12
Case-The Accused has been convicted u/s.409/466/467/471 I.P.C.The sole ground of conviction has been on the statement given in court by the enquiry officer(judge)that the accused had admitted the commiting of the offence & had then deposited the amount.
Whereas,nowhere in the whole enqury/previous statement/report of the judge or the challan the said fact"accused had admitted the commiting of the offence & had then deposited the amount"is stated or recorded.This has for the first time only come in evidence.
So,Qs.is Whether convistion can be given only on the evidence coming for the first time,that to of a wittness who was the enquiry officer?If NO then kindly give ruling for the same.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
anti power theft cases
when the prosecution fails to established about the theft with regard to conducting MRT test without presence of the consumer?
Whether report is binding on the consumer when the wife of consumer gave consent letter
and the same filed by the EE of electrical department after commencement of trial by adding some of the witness who where not examined by the police after filing charge sheet
plz send suitable decisions to me
and comments