Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
13 August 2010 at 20:21
IS AN employee in public and charitable trust is entitle to get benefits under minimum wages act?
Can he file CRIMINAL CASE against trust and also trustee under sec 19, 21(4) of minimum wages act?
what r the remedies as part of the said public trust?
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 20:21
An advocate told me that summary procedures are just worth less and it is very easy to get them converted into ordinary civil suits which go on lingering for decades.He said for example if 10-25% is deposited of the amount for which a cheque has been bounced, summary procedure under order 37 is converted into ordinary civil suit.
Is he right ?
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 20:15
It is very easy to plant drugs in "commercial quantity" in someones scooter or car.Even a fake customer can leave such drugs in some one's office also.What if the same PLANTER calls police and tries to frame the owner of that scooter,car or office who is quite innocent?
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 11:18
Wheather the cuffing of sec 138 & 420 is valid or not is there any judgment that the cuffing of Sec. 138 & 420 is not valid
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 11:01
one police men came and said i have a cheque case warrent and now it is on 72 steps, how can i take bail for this. should i have to appear in person to the court or an advocate can appear for me to get the bail , please advise
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 04:55
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked questions has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage and in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible. Accused has also filed a application for inadmissibility of these documents.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused ?
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 23:02
sir,
one person has filed about 50further criminal cases under 138 niact 1881 against various persons tollalling around 90 lakhs.he has stated in his complaint he has lent as friendly loan @2%p.m. he also stated that he given without maintaining any books.and given in cash .he does nt have money lending licence.does his debt covered under legally enforcable debt??? any judgement on this subject?? furtherIN HIS Cross examination he has admitted that he has lent money without money lending licence andhe is money lender. now the matter is adjourned for stATEMENT OF ACCUSED.I M VERY POOR PERSON AND MY LAWYRE ASSURED ME THAT we have good chances of winning the case as he has admitted as money lender and he dont have money lending licence.and we have judgement in our favour anil versus purshootam of bombay high courtand if trial court wont appreciate it then we move 2 session and high court after order but in appeal we have 2 deposit fine and my financial condition wont allow me this.nw sumbody suggested me 2 go 2 highcourt under482crpc for quashing the complaint as he has lent money without licence and he is amoney lender .so debt is not legally enforceable. nw plz suggest me what 2 do/??.m feeling like dying----- -----
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 21:00
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage and in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused ?
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 20:55
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought tobe inadmissible.
What are the options open to the accused
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding Petition Copy in Cr.P.C 125?
Can I get the petition Copy of 125 Cr.P.C even before First Hearing from the Court Staff?