Anonymous
18 August 2010 at 14:27
QUASH PETITION WAS FILED AFTER CHARGES WERE FRAMED AND PLEA RECORDED.EVEN WITNESSES WERE SUMMONED.HEARING WAS COMPLETED AFTER ARGUEMENTS FROM BOTH SIDES.JUDGE SAID ORDERS WILL BE GIVEN THE FOLLOWING WEEK.ITEM STILL APPEARING AS REGULAR ITEM IN CAUSELIST AND NOT REACHING SINCE MORE THAN 2 WEEKS.WHAT STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO GET THE ORDER FAST?
Anonymous
18 August 2010 at 09:38
if a lady file a case against a men by saying that a particular person harrasing her like comments on her dress anything may be,, what proof does that girl required to prove it in a court of law ,coz sometimes girls misused their rights against a man, what measure can a man take to prove his innocence.
Anonymous
17 August 2010 at 22:22
Case History in briefly
------------------------
Person C has registered a complaint against A1, A2, A3 U/S -406/420/506/34. Police has issued an arrest warrant against the person A1, A2, A3. To avoid the police arrest A1, A2, A3 prayed for the Anticipatory bail before High Court. But due to the negligence of their lawyer High Court rejected the Anticipatory bail application.
A1, A2, A3 are fearing to surrender as there is a life threat for them by the person C.
C is an influential person and having the muscle power in the locality/police jurisdiction where the FIR has been registered.
Couple of years back C has kidnapped A1 for a ransom and there is a case pending against C before a session court for the same. At that time A2 and A3 was the prime witness for that kidnapping case against C.
A2 and A3 are brothers and came from a lower middle class family of teacher. Their aged parents are totally depending on them for daily bread and butter. His father age 80 years and Mother age 73 years are heart patient. His father has undergone the heart surgery couple of times.
A2 and A3 has does not have any link/contact with the person C, who complained against them.
PLEASE SUGGEST/ADVICE WHAT WOULD BE THE NEXT COURSE OF ACTION SHOULD TAKEN BY A1 , A2 , A3 TO GET THE JUSTICE OR TO GET SOME RELIEF FROM POLICE as well the THE PERSON C.
Chetan
17 August 2010 at 20:37
That in a 138 case the cheques were issued by brother B whereas all the transaction were made by the complainant with brother B, the Brother A is not a HUF member
What will the consequences ?
Is there any chance ?
That brother B is not liable to pay the amount ?
Merely issuance of cheque is sufficient ?
Pls. Reply with Case LAWSVery urgent
M/s. Y-not legal services
17 August 2010 at 18:37
Whats your opinion about prostitution. Its must be an offence in india? Because they didn't do it just for sex. For them day to day needs. If They didn't hurt any one, cheat any one, compell any one mean how its can be offence? If its offence mean why that customers should not be penalized? Leave your thoughts as an expert.
Anonymous
17 August 2010 at 15:44
Dear All
I iam supposed to issue a public notice in Lucknow in regards to the incidence awhich happened to me in lucknow on 21st may 2010 as my wife had forcefully with the help of police had taken signature on divorce papers.
What are the steps to do issue public notice
Thanks and Regards
Abdul Hameed
17 August 2010 at 11:18
I shall be obliged if the experts advise whether a de-factor complainant, can appoint an advocate, as intervenor, at the stage of FIR itself, so that such advocate can watch bail application, or anticipator bail application, make objectins or seek conditions for bail, to ensure that the accused do not flee from investigation. Can interenor be appointed in trial courts ? Is there any case law allowing this. I was told there are SC judgement and even karnataka HC judgements. Can you please clarify ?
Abdul Hameed
oahamid@yahoo.com
Anonymous
17 August 2010 at 11:11
My father was a member of BSE and active in share broking business. He had appointed younger brother as attorney under POA. The brother being of criminal mid set made him open joint accounts in BOI which are still operative since his death in Jan. 1996. These accounts were used for his business and crediting of dividends for the shares held by him. Due to nature of account I could not get them closed and the younger brother has siphoned off huge sums of money from them till now and is not disclosing the details to legal heirs nor comming forward for arbitration.
Pl. advice as to what action/s the legal heirs can do to protect thier interests.
Anonymous
16 August 2010 at 19:15
If the Husband is staying with Parents and each and every articles belong to his Mother in such scenario if for execution purpose wife need to go for attachment for recovery of money due what all articles she can go for attachment beside Salary of Husband if the salary is a meager amount?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cheque bounce, N I 138 act
Dear Sir / Madam,
Please answer me below question ?
1. If Cheque issued to Party, but name & date is blank ( Amount, signature & amount in words filled). ?
2. No any written agreement or promissory note ?
3. Total 10 cheque issued, but 2 cheque is clear, 8 cheque bounce, remark "insufficient balance "
Pleaes reply me in this case ?