Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 06:38
Dear Experts:
Is sec 79 of NI act applicable/enforceable in cheque bounce cases? There is inordinate delay in my case with court dates nearly 2 months apart. And accused also is protracting the case by seeking adjournments citing frivolous reasons. Hence, can the agreed upon interest according to Sec 79 be enforced on accused by court for these long delays also? Should I also file a civil recovery case or is there any other alternative where heavy court fees may be avoided?
Is there any legal recourse for speeding up my case on grounds of my delicate health etc., ? Please help me out. Please post any citations etc., in this regard too.
Regards and Thanks in advace-
Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 00:14
Respected sir,
is it possible that court can review its order if prayed ?
for review the order we have to take permission from somewhere?
reason is claiming to higher court against the order is like to challenge but if considered again may give some relief
kind help
thanks in advance
vinod bansal
28 January 2011 at 22:15
R/Experts
Notice was sent on 14/12/2010,no acknowledgement/receipt was received back regarding delievery of Regd ad.what is last date /limitation for filing complaint us 138 NI Act.Kindly suggest.Thanks
manoj
28 January 2011 at 21:50
Hi all,
In a suit where a complaint was filed by the complainant under the above mentioned sections for cheating , impersonation, using fake documents as genuine and for this the complainant has the prima facia case with in front of the judge with all the documentary evidence against the accused still there is any way from which accused can escaped . complainant has very very strong case with documentary proof.
what will happen with the accused?
Arvind Singh Chauhan
28 January 2011 at 21:34
Sir what may be the impact ?
if any judge acquits in one case, on one of the ground that "There are no independent or public witness".
In another case he strike off the same defence and convicts a person giving the reason that " Generally public hesitate to come and give evidence before court"
Sir Is it right to apply different principles by the same judge, though both are different cases.
Janak Raval
28 January 2011 at 21:29
Dear all
I have a case regarding the Prohibition Act in Gujarat ( u/s 65,66B,66E,116 of Prohibition Act), Now my client wants to releave as Acquittal, the case is bonafide.
Whether any possibility to get release from the Legal Process?
If any ways are available then please guide me for the same .
Thanks in anticipation.
lalit kumar
28 January 2011 at 20:45
sir my wife committe suecide on 34th dec 2010 after one and 8 months of marriage. she remain under treatment of depression for 8 months just months of marriage. at the time of suecide my in laws not reacted but after 10 days they lodge a FIR under section 498a and 306. what should i do before arresting
Naresh Verma
28 January 2011 at 17:47
Sir,
Pl. help on following:
1) a Few year back if Notice sent to out of Delhi from a particular place in Delhi then case heard in that court from which place the notice sent. But now after high court judgement it is wrong the complainant is belong to which place from there jurisdiction comes hence the court heard case from which complainant belongs not from where notice sent. If there is any judgement which clarify this point please provde.
Thanks
Anonymous
28 January 2011 at 16:52
Sir,
If a first person gets a job by giving fake experience certificate. Also if a person marries by showing same fake experience certificate to second person.
Then can the second person book the first person in fraud case.
What is the maximum imprisonment and charges to be applied (dhokadadi ka maamla). Like can she be arrested and police remand sought.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partial Payment - NI 138
Dear Experts:
In my case accused has paid partially after issue of Lawyer Notice. But he has not paid the agreed upon interest (as agreed in promissory note and sworn affidavit). Please send me any Case Laws that says case is sustainable eventhough partial payment has been made.
Also, the pronote and consideration receipt issued does not have stamp or witness signatures but is signed by accused. Is such a pronote valid in court?
Regards.,