harish
29 January 2011 at 21:52
Please need this judgment- where these judgments are reported(AIR,ELS etc).
Judgment :
Court No.29
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow
Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002
Syed Nazim Husain
Vs.
The Additional Principal
Judge Family Court & another
Hon'ble A. Mateen, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A.
Since a very trivial point is involved I propose to dispose of the petition at this initial stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 24.10.2002 be quashed.
From the order dated 24.10.2002 it comes out that the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court on the application, moved by the petitioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. instead of disposing of the same had postponed disposal of the said application and ordered that said application may be disposed of after evidence is recorded in case No. 566/89.
In my view, if an application is moved in the pending case bringing to the notice of the court that any false evidence knowing well has been filed or fabricated in such proceedings, the court should dispose of the said application first before proceeding any further or before recording of further evidence.
In the circumstances, I dispose of the present application and direct the Additional Principal Judge Family Court to dispose of the application so moved by the petitioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. before proceeding further in accordance with law.
With the above observations the petition is disposed of finally.
9.1.2003 sd- A.Mateen
Thanking you.......
Prabhakar
29 January 2011 at 21:36
In the case of parties of two side, one parties drawes the cheque in the favour of other party who is in one state and in the name drawee bank which in the other state and party issueing the cheque is in the other state. so where the jurisdiction lies and why and if any case is there please provide me. as early as possible
Rahul
29 January 2011 at 18:42
Can a power of attorney holder make compromise in criminal cases which is compoundable ?
Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 15:46
i was having LMV with badge riding my van belongs to medium goods vehicle category,suddenly a man riding a bike fully drunkard came and hit my van backwards at a stretch his left leg fractured and he was taken to GH by his drunkard friends and after 2 days he died in the hospital by some other reason.policemen making to save him filed a case against me of driving under negligence actand i was remanded ang bailed out after a day.kindly say how could i be rescued, iam the registered owner of the van and dont know how to handle both criminal and claim case.
Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 14:44
ONE OF MY CLIENT HAS ISSUE ME A CHEQUE AND HAS MADE THE CHEQUE AS " STOPPAYMENT'. CAN YOU PL ADVICE ME WHAT LEGAL STEP I CAN TAKE AGAINST HIM.
mala
29 January 2011 at 12:34
Sir
I would like to know from the experts whether
1. If any work for which the complainanat said to have given money and the work is already done and the same was relayed in the interndet . the complainant is himself an expert in computer and his associats are very well connected.
2. The complainant was on a hunger strike for the past four days before maing the complaint to cbi. and he has not taken anything and a group of media persons were alongwith him for the sake of giving him a wide publicity. can this person reach the cbi office at 900 am on the date of compklaint and remain there till 1130pm in the night so for the whole can any hungry man of the past four days what is medical opinion in this regard.
3. when the complainant himself admitted in his website that the work is done and also alleged that the opposite party is trying to purchase judges and the bench in india. does it not amount to c ontempt of court.
4. In his press conference in the media he has admitted that ONE PERSON CAME TO HIM AND TOLD HIM THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IF HE PAYS BRIBE. THEREAFGTER HE KLODGES HIS COMPLAIANT TO CBI MENTIONED TWO NAMES. CBI ARRESTED THREE PERSONS. CBI NOW CHARGESHEETED FOUR PERSONS. WHAT IS THIS SIR GOING ON.
5. CBI IN ITS CHARGESHEET HAS QUOTED "TWO PERSONS WERE FORMALLY ARRESTED " THEY HAVE NOT SIAD ANYTHING ABOUT THE THE ARREST OLF THE THIRD PERSON WHY
NO FIR LODGED AGAINST THE THIRD PERSON
Smruti Shah
29 January 2011 at 12:34
Dear All,
I want to know the procedure
My client was arrested by police vide act Bompbay prohibition act ,against charge of supply of foreign wine . Recently he was in Central Jail of porbandar-Gujarat,I want to know what is the procedure before siting the Board ,and after order of board.
Smruti Kothari
Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 10:58
I have a question my 498A trial is about to begin will on the first date a copy of chargesheet will be provided to me and will I be required to present my reply against the charges on the second date. How and what happens on the first and second date.
The charges are 498A, 406, 3/4 DP Act. what if the opposite side claims that the streedhan is with me. I do have some articles that I want to return but the list that they have submitted is too large that were never part of the gifts so how does the case proceeds in such cases. what the CJM would ask me to return as the things that were not there I cant return.
Please Advise how to defend in such cases.
Anonymous
29 January 2011 at 06:53
Dear Experts:
Defendent advocate is asking highly personal and embarrasing questions (but only vaguly relevant) in open court. Please enlight me on what sort of questions may be/may NOT be asked during cross of witness. What is the remedy in such cases viz., Can I ask for answering such questions confidentially/refuse to answer without affecting my case?
Regards.,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Contradictory allegations in civil and criminal suits
Ld counsels,
Will contradictory allegations in civil and criminal suits by wife a ground for quashing the criminal case, as the criminal case is mala fide.
Wife claiming husband as mentally sick and impotent in divorce suit.
In the criminal case wife claims that husband suppressed a love affair before marriage.
Please clarify.