Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 19:46
Dear Sir,
Anticipatory bail has been granted for 3 persons(mom,dad and my sister) out of 8 persons who have been implicated in the false case driven by My sister's husband with the support of false medical prescription showing internal injuries.My lawyer said that AB of rest of the 5 persons will be served after that.
As per the lawyer court has advised us to come with 6 persons as a surety but we failed to arrange it.We have ony 3 persons as a surety.Can money surety be a substitute?We are ready to give money as a surety ...Our lawyer is sometimes look suspicious as he rarely talks in detail of all these but as a renowned one in the city. Please advice
please give us directions:-
arunkumar
06 April 2011 at 16:56
state has filed false case on my friend under section 354 ipc.Only witness in the case has been cross examined who does not support the police story.The complainant is not traceable by the police even after the court issued summons/warrants.Onthe defence lawyers request court has closed the evidence and the accused has to give statement under 313 crpc.What will be the points to be noted for argument and whether the court will dismiss the case or keep it pending for the appearence of the complainant.pl advise.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 16:42
what is the procedure to conduct the divorce proceding by video conferncing.
it is contested
case
I stay quite far and not possible to travel so frequenty due to court case and expense involoved
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 16:26
hi
divoice request based on curelty and 498a file by wife.
What is procedure, would court send couples for consuelling. Husband does not want to take back wife after false 498a and police case. would he be still required to attend consuelling
Would husband get chance to provide proof against allegation on first hearing.
sajoli
06 April 2011 at 15:49
Respected Experts,
I have already filled civil suit in which OP has submitted all contradictory statements and various false papers with forged signatures in my civil suit reply, FIR lodge with police station, and writ against state. Now I am planning to go for a private criminal case against OP. my query is that should I mention specifically all the contradictory statements and false papers with forged signatures in my private criminal case or I make basic case and use all the evidence in argument.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:12
Procedure for recording statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., holding test identification parade of a person as well as case property. What is needed so that statement become substantive piece of evidence
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:01
the accussed has been convicted for off. p/s 353 of penal code on the evidence of three witnesses who did not identify him in court.
An appeal has been preferred against the said judgement.Please quote citation regarding non identifying of accusseed in court particularly bombay or supreme court
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:39
Dear Experts,
Request for Draft of Petition for Cr P C Section 125 and Section 24 of HMA.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 13:19
Am a law graduate myself but work with the corporate. In 2006, while in employment with a company I was instructed to get the company's vehicle (with company's ownership )released on superdaari from Moti Nagar PS which I did since it was confiscated by the police officials. Before this the vehicle had met with an accident injuring a person the details of which I was not aware of. The person was discharged after a week from the hospital. I left the company in 2006 itself. I got calls from the PS to appear in the court which i did not attend. The court issued arrest warrants in 2011 which I got cancelled by presenting myself and stating that i do not remember any details of the matter.
Meanwhile, the company sold the vehicle which i came to know thru the driver who was in the court and in whose name the case is titled vs. state.
The magistrate has asked me to produce the vehicle on the next date which is in May, 2011 and has taken on record that I am epileptic patient with lapse of memory occuring occasionally, for which I have produced evidence on record.
I do not know the whereabouts of the present owner of the vehicle.
How should I proceed in the matter. I have the letter of employment of the company who was the owner of the vehicle at the time of accident. Will it be my liability to produce the vehicle when I am not the owner and which I got released on supardaari as a part of my duty under the employment of the Company. The MD of the Company had given me authorisation on co.'s letter head to get the vehicle released in my name as superdaar which is on court record. Please advise as i am already 58 plus of age and do not want any problem in legal proceedings. There is no fatal injury and i was not even with the vehicle when it met with the accident.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
file application before high court
with reference to my earlier question i welcome the suggestion.
I intend to bring to the notice of them that the accused in this case has already made application in the court of Judicial Magistrate before one year and thereafter the till last oneyear prosecution did not submitted the chargesheet copies despite reminded by the Magistrate to Public Prosecutor.
In such circumstances the question was asked for further action to stop harassment.