Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 15:15

Extra Judicial Confession.

Extra Judicial Confession means any example.

also give me a case means i can understand it more properly.

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 13:29

Private complaint u/s.200 Crpc

Can I file a private complaint u/s.200 Crpc read with Sec.17 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, where the divoce case or conjucal right case pending before family court

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 12:49

bank account closer

i have salary bank a/c in ICICI Bank,
bank converted it to saving account due to non transfer of salary, i withdraw 3000/- from my account, because bank asking for maintain min. Rs.5000/-, i requested to bank for close my account with mail, but they refused & asked to go to bank at chandigarh
now every month bank sending me statement with debit balance with QAB charges every quarter, debit balance going high, i am not using this bank account from last 3 years,

how i close bank a/c and can i pay penalty that is debited to my account now debit balance is aprox. Rs.10000/-

if i can't close bank a/c debit balance increasing day by day,
what any bank do for this type of accounts
are they close or block this type of accounts them self or they send legal notic to there customers to pay debit balance

kindly help me

pru   25 June 2011 at 09:28

anticipatory bail

I am facing a 498a. my anticipatory bail hearing is going on.

chargesheet has not been filed in 3 months.Can I get anticipatory bail on this basis?

A.G.Syam kumar   25 June 2011 at 09:25

Jurisdiction of fast track (Adhoc) courts

Whether the fast track (Adhoc) courts in india are having jurisdiction to conduct trail and hearing of appeal on NDPS matters ?

if so,which notification empowers the said courts in such regard

pru   25 June 2011 at 09:15

498a anticipatory bail

I and my parents am facing a 498a. 2 months back we applied for anticipatory bail. My parents have anticipatory bail but judge has kept my bail on hold for a reconciliation attempt.

My wife has an illicit relation. Police diary also mentions that. As per police diary there is no evidence for dowry and it completely favors us.

I dont want to bring her back.

I am afraid if i says no judge will not give anticipatory bail

please help what to do

rohit garg   25 June 2011 at 07:29

what is the procedure of criminial case

a criminal case has been filed by my brother and then the case has been goes to local police station and after that investigation was done it has been found that the plot alloted to my father was rightly transfered to me, the police has made investigations to sub-registrar,DDA,and the witness on the conveyance deed and then it was found that plot was rightly transfered and now the police submitted the report in the magistrate office and sir now you are requested to tell me what is the further procedure of the magistrate?

Anonymous   25 June 2011 at 02:33

reply of notice

Please send me drafdt of rply of legal notice
My client received a legal notice under section 378,406,499,500 of Indian penal code and also under copy right and patent act but section is not mentioned in the notice under this act

Anonymous   24 June 2011 at 22:45

Section 202 no use by the magistrate.

202. Postponement of issue of process.
(1) Any Magistrate, on receipt of a complaint of an offence of which he is authorised to take cognizance or which has been made over to him under section 192, may, if he thinks fit, postpone the issue of process against the accused, and either inquire into the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by a police officer or by such other person as he thinks fit, for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding: Provided that no such direction for investigation shall be made,--
(a) where it appears to the Magistrate that the offence complained of is triable exclusively by the Court of Session; or
(b) where the complaint has not been made by a Court, unless the complainant and the witnesses present (if any) have been examined on oath under section 200.

(2) In an inquiry under sub- section (1), the Magistrate may, if he thinks fit, take evidence of witnesses on oath: Provided that if it appears to the Magistrate that the offence complained of is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, he shall call upon the complainant to produce all his witnesses and examine them on oath.


Question: As if the offence is triable by the session court than the investigation shall not be made but sub section say that (Provided that if it appears to the Magistrate that the offence complained of is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, he shall call upon the complainant to produce all his witnesses and examine them on oath.) my question is if the offence is trialable by the session court & if the investigation is not made then why to take the evidence & take the witness evidence what is the need. First part say no investigation if offence triable by the session court & other say that triable by the session court then evidence should be taken I think it is illogically as magistrate don’t have to do with the trial process or investigation then he/she has to unnecessary take the evidence & all procees.

Totally Confused what section what to says?

any case law to understand the section more

Thanks

Anonymous   24 June 2011 at 21:56

DV Case

Dear sir,

in continuation of my last query regarding jewellery.

We are seeking to dismis the Dv case.

dispute between the husband and wife is absent and one small child is present. parents of wife using the relation as a tool to collect money facts are present in proof form.

matter is entirely differnt as common DV case . in this matter husband and wife both wants to stay with each other but parents of bride kept their family lawyer to handle the case.

till date neither husband nor wife got single opportunity to say their word. entire matter is proceeding only by the words of lawyers.

magistrate is also female and as common she is taking into account that if any female come in the court means she is aggreied.

husband tried to say his words many times but always restricted by magistrate.

how one system can spoil a family with blind faith.as magistrate once said that if your wife came to court then it means you are torturing her, what nonsense?

even once wife tried to say magistrate but magistrate replied you dont worry , you dont say anything your lawyer will handle everything,

it is one complete year passed we did not met with each other,once she said on phone do anything but complete the case soon, but how?