Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

avinash   13 July 2011 at 14:08

What action can be taken on witnesses?

I would like to inquire if the witness is proved wrong in any case then what action can i take against them? or can i take any action against them for abetment to the party who has filed a false complaint against me.

Thank you

Rajkumar Sharma   13 July 2011 at 12:25

bail order

My client is in the jail u/s 376 rape and 106 attempt to murder. There were no submission of challan in session cout. In suicide note lady wrote two person names.The other person i not caught by police.
Suggest how the bail possible before 90 days

Anonymous   13 July 2011 at 11:30

URGENT 498A/406

“In these facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest, applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing PB in the sum of Rs. 25000/- with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of IO/SHO.”

The bail was granted on 6/7/2011 and i received certified order copy on12/7/2011.

IO didnt came to my place to arrest me after bail granted on that date. Previously i had 3 days interm bail which finished on 2/7/2011 and the notice to surrender was given on 29//6/2011 by IO.

Now what should i do? Should i go to police station with sureties or should i wait for IO to come my place for arrest. What is the procedure.
Kindly tell me the procedure.
Kindly help (Its Urgent)
NOTE: Chargesheet not yet filed in court from last 11 months.

Dr G V Rao   13 July 2011 at 10:57

Why punishments are different

The circumstances leading to the murder and later destruction of evidence in Grover case and Tandoor case of 1995 are similar. In the Tandoor case too their was a love triangle, suspicion of one over the other, murder in a fit of anger and attempted destruction of evidence. In Tandoor case atleast the dead body was not cut brutally but tried to be burnt off. In the present Grover case the killing was more brutal and unparalleled. However in Tandoor case the final judgement was death sentence but in Grover murder case the main accused is sentenced to 10 years jail term as he was 'guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder'. The co-accused in Tandoor case Mr Keshav Kumar was granted a sentence of 7 years RI but Maria in Grover Case got only 3 years and later let off since the time was commuted. Both Keshav and Maria attempted to destroy evidence after murder. It makes me wonder as to why the punishments are so different when the circumstances are similar. Experts may please clarify.

Anonymous   13 July 2011 at 08:19

False criminal cases

One person has recently tried to implicate my father and brother falsely in a criminal case by providing false evidence to police that it was an attempt to murder. We are a well educated, well traveled family, never caused any harm to any one in our life. But showing some fake injury which he got from some accident, and using some local press, politician, he managed to lodge a false case against us. Initially we were charged under IPC 307 and 324, and later withdrew 307.

But now medical report suggests that the injury is simple, and caused by either accident or some blunt weapon?

How important medical report in these kind of cases? If medical report is the one of most importance in this case , can it be 324?

My brother who works abroad, requires renewal of his passport.
will it be difficult to renew his passport, if these cases are pending against him?


Thanks







Devendra Kumar   13 July 2011 at 08:07

Format of Complaint u/s 138 NIAct

Please show me a format of complaint to be filed u/s 138 NI Act.

kuldeep kumar   13 July 2011 at 04:29

arrest by magistrate

if any offence is commited in presense of mag and he commit accused in custody u/s 167.my question is procedure underwhich police arrest and send accused in custody to mag and then judicial mag send him police/judicil custody is relaxed.one more question such mag in whose persence offence is commited himself send him in custody or such mag will send him to any other mag and then any other magistaret shall send him into custody u/s 167.last question what does it mean for whose arrest mag is empowred to issue warrant u/s 44 crpc.(does it mean if some person is avoiding summon and a warrant is issued and such person accidently comes in persence of mag and he arrest him u/s 44 crpc)

Anonymous   13 July 2011 at 01:49

Copy of complaint

498a complaint file in court, i am accused in the case. I wanted to get copy of complaint,

how can I get the copy, lawyer is asking for 3000 court plus 5000 as his fee to get just copy

what are the court charges.

anonym   12 July 2011 at 23:42

Fighting my own case

I have been falsely implicated us 138.

The story so far:
Earlier counsel was negligent and did not file my reply in time. Cross examination of complainant opportunity gone after 3 hearings. Chaned my counsel as advised by judge.
2nd counsel sends his junior who has no knowledge of procedures like application filing and all. Further weakened my case.

Cross examination formally closed and my Exam-in chief started and is midway.

For you expert people I got the advice that S-311 should be invoked to re-consider closure of cross examination.

MY QUESTION:
THOUGH NOT BOASTING OF MYSELF BUT IF GIVEN A CHANCE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION OF COMPLAINANT- I CAN PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN ONE HEARING.

SO IF MATTERS BECOME WORSE AND MY COUNSEL IS NOT ABLE TO HANDLE IT- IS THERE A WAY WHERE I CAN DIRECTLY CROSS-EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT AND WITNESS??

anonym   12 July 2011 at 23:23

Fighting my own case

I have been falsely implicated us 138.

The story so far:
Earlier counsel was negligent and did not file my reply in time. Cross examination of complainant opportunity gone after 3 hearings. Chaned my counsel as advised by judge.
2nd counsel sends his junior who has no knowledge of procedures like application filing and all. Further weakened my case.

Cross examination formally closed and my Exam-in chief started and is midway.

For you expert people I got the advice that S-311 should be invoked to re-consider closure of cross examination.

MY QUESTION:
THOUGH NOT BOASTING OF MYSELF BUT IF GIVEN A CHANCE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION OF COMPLAINANT- I CAN PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN ONE HEARING.

SO IF MATTERS BECOME WORSE AND MY COUNSEL IS NOT ABLE TO HANDLE IT- IS THERE A WAY WHERE I CAN DIRECTLY CROSS-EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT AND WITNESS??