Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   09 August 2011 at 09:55

Prepare bc certificate through forged documents

Sir, the inquiry conducted by Police Authorities is against wife who used the Backward Class certificate prepared by forged documents. Can husband object on this, that why not father of the female be punished rather than his daughter, because father prepare her BC certificate with his application, affidavit and forged documents. Please advise

Bruce Shiv   09 August 2011 at 09:12

498 reversal

My estranged wife filed false 498a, 323, 507 charges which I was acquitted of, as she admitted before the learned judge that she had filed false evidence in a fit of anger. (statement on record) Now as I am continuing with Divorce case so she has applied to the court to have my acquittal overturned & the case re-opened. She has also reported to the Police I am threatening her with assault though we have had ZERO communications in over 5 months. She is a deranged, obsessed nutter hell bent only on harming me because I refuse to live with her & have anything ever further to do with her. What prospects are there for this being re-opened & over-turned?

Anonymous   09 August 2011 at 00:18

By mistake filed a wrong affidavit in consumer court

Dear All,

I won a consumer forum case and the Opposite Party was given 8 weeks from receipt of the order to pay me the costs and compensation. They did not pay and I went in for execution.

In the execution application I had to file a affidavit stating that the "Order has become final and executable"

I was told by the executives at the consumer forum that the order is dispatched within 2-3 days. Hence I filed the execution application accordingly assuming that after 4 days the order would have been received by the OP.

During the course of the execution I learnt that the order was posted after 10 days. So technically when I filed the execution application it was not 'final and executable' but after a week became executable.

My query is: based on the above facts can I be held liable for filing an affidavit which had an unintentional mistake.

Further, 6 months have passed and the OP has not paid the Compensation and has filed an Appeal after 2.5 months of the order. (Appeal still pending and condonation of delay not accepted)

deepak juneja   08 August 2011 at 22:05

Pergury

SIR KINDLY TELL ME IF THERE ARE FIVE PERSONS WHO HAVE GIVEN FALSE STATEMENTS AFTER OATH IN FRONT OF A CIVIL JUDGE AND I HAVE TO FILE A CASE OF PERGURY AGAINST THEM TNEN IT WILL BE A SINGLE CASE AGAINST ALL OR SEPERATE CASES AGAINST ALL OF THEM DEEPAK JUNEJA

B.R.MANIKANDAN   08 August 2011 at 21:30

70(2)crpc

for recalling the warrant personal appearance of accused is necessary or not ?please help me.

Anonymous   08 August 2011 at 20:29

N.i act, section 138, cr.p.c, (dishonour of cheque) section 311 rejected

I THE COMPLAINANT HAS MADE AN APPLICATION U/S.311 OF Cr.P.C FRO RE-CALLING FOR RE-EXAMINATION.THE COMPLAINANT WANT TO BRING ON RECOED THE COPY OF DELIVERY CHALLAN & TAX INVOICE.(THIS 2 DOCUMENTS ARE NOT REFERRED IN THE COMPLAINT.)
THIS SAID APPLICATION IS MOVED AFTER THE STATEMENT OF ACCUSED U/S.313 OF Cr.P.C. IS OVER AND THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED COUPLE OF TIMES FOR FINAL ARGUMENT.
THE APPLICATION U/S.311 OF Cr.P.C. STANDS REJECTED.
I FILED REVISION APPLICATION.
ARE THERE ANY JUDGMENT WHICH STATES THAT SUCH REVISION APPLICATION CAN BE ALLOWED.
PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR OPINION & REFERENCE ON IT.
THANK YOU

Anonymous   08 August 2011 at 20:13

N.i act, section 138, cr.p.c, (dishonour of cheque) section 311 rejected

I THE COMPLAINANT HAS MADE AN APPLICATION U/S.311 OF Cr.P.C FRO RE-CALLING FOR RE-EXAMINATION.THE COMPLAINANT WANT TO BRING ON RECOED THE COPY OF DELIVERY CHALLAN & TAX INVOICE.(THIS 2 DOCUMENTS ARE NOT REFERRED IN THE COMPLAINT.)
THIS SAID APPLICATION IS MOVED AFTER THE STATEMENT OF ACCUSED U/S.313 OF Cr.P.C. IS OVER AND THE MATTER IS ADJOURNED COUPLE OF TIMES FOR FINAL ARGUMENT.
I FILED REVISION APPLICATION.
ARE THERE ANY JUDGMENT WHICH STATES THAT SUCH REVISION APPLICATION CAN BE ALLOWED.
PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR OPINION & REFERENCE ON IT.
THANK YOU

Anonymous   08 August 2011 at 17:26

Divorced wife is not allowing husband to enter flat

Dear Sir,
A divorced wife is not allowing husband to enter flat in husbands name
A divorced wife is occupying her ex-husbands flat. The minor son is staying there and she was allowed to stay there to look after minor son. Though there is no agreement in writing.
Now she is not vacating the flat. What criminal action has to be taken to vacate the flat?
What about civil action?
All goods in flat belong to husband.

Anonymous   08 August 2011 at 17:08

Cognizance of offence

X commits an offence by causing injury to Y, punishable u/s 323 of the Indian Penal Code which is punishable for a term of one year or with a fine of Rs 1,000/-. Y makes a complaint to the Metropolitan Magistrate against X after 10 months of the commission of the offence. Can the said Court take cognizance of that offence?

Anonymous   08 August 2011 at 17:04

Can adivorced wife stop husband from entering his flat

Dear Sir,
A divorced wife is not allowing husband to enter flat in husbands name
A divorced wife is occupying her ex-husbands flat. The minor son is staying there and she was allowed to stay there to look after minor son. Though there is no agreement in writing.
Now she is not vacating the flat. What criminal action has to be taken to vacate the flat?
What about civil action?
All goods in flat belong to husband.