Dear Sir, I was a student in some university and university filled a criminal case on me and some other student with some section like 341, 332, 353, etc now that case has been taken back (withdrawn) by state govt. In 2017. So does I will face any problem at the time of appointment of govt. Job or not at all.
Edit - taken back means withdrawn.
Does a Partner of LLP can be liable for the dishonour of Cheque as same as the Designated Partner.
Dear Respected Experts,
Case History in Brief:
Anitha given a CheQue to house owner Kannan for house rental advance. The cheque was Anitha’s mother bank account. House owner Kannan withdrew the amount. After two years Anitha vacated Kanan’s house. Kannan told Anitha that he given the Amount to his Brother Krishnan because both Kannan & Krishnan partitioned their property. Now the property belongs to Krishnan. Krishnan also ensured Anitha that he will give the amount in 3 month’s time. After 3 months Krishnan given a Cheque to Anitha. When Anitha deposited Krishnan’s cheque, it bounced back due to “insufficient fund”. Now the petitioner is Anitha.
Anitha filed a Complaint u/s Negotiable Instrument Act 138 for Cheque bounce Case.
My Question:
1. Can Complainant-Anitha call Kannan as witness u/s 311 CrPc in cheque bounce case?
2. Can Complainant-Anitha Call her mother as witness u/s 311 CrPc to prove that her mother given the Cheque
to her daughter Anitha for rental Advance?
Thanks in Advance
There was a married man having 2 kids whose wife passed away.
Through mutual friends he contacted me to marry him
I denied to marry him but he asked me to a good friend with him.
When seeing his situation I agreed to marry him
He physically abused me saying that in future he will marry me.
Now when he used me several times he is denying to get married and mentally harassing me to leave him.
I m suffering from a mental trauma due to it that he used me
Dear Experts,
I had rented a shop for which I paid rs.2 Lakhs Advance. After I vocated the Shop the owner asked me time to return my Shop Advance amount. But it is almost 4 years have gone. He did not pay the Shop Advance amount. I made a police complaint. Police enquired and asked the owner to give a ChQ worth rs.2 Lakh. The ChQ is bouncing due to insufficient money. I filed ChQ bource case. He did not attend Court. Finally Court passed Ex-Parte Order.
My Question:
1) Can I ask Court to attach his property? I have taken EC & His House document through sub-registrar office.
2) If not, Is there any other way I can get my shop advance Back?
Thanks In Advance
Ram
Summon u/s 138 N I Act is given by Dasti in two copies by court to complainant . One copy is sent to Address of Accused by Rgd post AD. On the date of court hearing other copy of summon with postal receipt of Regd post AD is handed over to trial court, thus summon is deemed to have been served.
Now Bailable Warrant is issued and given Dasti to Complainant. Now my humble query is that Whether the said Bailable Warrant be sent by Rgd post AD to concerning Police station to be executed and the photocopy of said Bailable Warrant along with Rgd post AD receipt be handed over to trial court as proof of sending Dasti to Concerning police station. Otherwise if trial Court ask where is Bailable/Arrest warrant given Dasti, complainant has no answer. Is there any illegality in it, because a policeman gave confusion to us by telling that Bailable Warrant as well as Arrest Warrant Can not be copied and photocopy of said can not be given to court alongwith regd postal receipt, it is some type of offence.
This is required as in general, whenever a Bailable/Arrest warrant is issued, if not taken Dasti, it is hand over to policeman without taking any receipt thereof, and if it does not returned back either executed or non-executed, no follow up action is taken by court, and simply issue another Bailable/Arrest Warrant,and keep on doing so. By taking Dasti, and sending to concerning Police Station by Regd post,at least it is proved that bailable warrant has been posted at least concerning Police Station.
Mr. A given a Loan to Mr. B for Rs. 40 Lakh by bank transfer.
and Mr. B as well Mr. C, father of Mr. B has signed the promissory note.
and then Mr. A has issued cheque [ 40 lakh] towards repayment of loan amount which got bounced.
on complaint to Mr. C being father of Mr. B has issued a fresh cheque [40 lakh]for the repayment loan amount but this also got bounced.
Now we send legal notice to both of them about dishonour of their respective cheque towards loan repayment.
and ultimately filled criminnal complaint but the magistrate asking for seperate court fees on each cheque i.e. court fees on 80 lakh.
being legal academic query coming before me for first time please help on the subject
Dear gentlemen
May I request you to give your advice for my problem.
I am working in Saudi Arabia since 2007 and my family was also living with me in KSA.
In April 2018 I left the kingdom on final exit with my family and settled in Davanagere karnataka.and in the same year.
After a month I joined another company and staying alone. And my family is in India.
Since 2008 my father in law (wife’s father) taken money from me till 2013 .In fact he is running illegal real estate business. He promised my wife that he will give some properties from his business I have given 1.06 crores through bank and 65 lakhs by cash .He invested this money and made lot of money and properties
But he has given properties worth of Rs 125700 and Rs 174500 then he made all properties in his son’s name. Still he has to pay me Rs 15668500 plus interest or the properties worth of my balance money and interest.
Recently I came to know that he has made properties within his family transferred all the properties in his son’s name he has taken release deed from my wife and her 4 sisters.
The issues
1) Out of 2 properties one property is in litigation. A land measures 2.05 acres is encroached by another person and I have left with less than 1 acre. My father in law is not ready to resolve the issue as per sales deed.
2) I have to recover my money worth of 1.06 crores which I have given officially through bank from my wife’s NRE account.
I have the following issues
As we were living in Saudi Arabia as residents up to April 2018. I believe cause of action or limitation starts from April 2018 – correct me if I am wrong.
I have approached him several times but he never cares about my wife’s words I have no contact with him since 15 years. All the transactions happened through my wife.
I want to know whether the limitation is over or is it effective from April 2018.
Could you please help me with this issue and suggest a good advocate for me
Dear gentlemen
May I request you to give your advice for my problem.
I am working in Saudi Arabia since 2007 and my family was also living with me in KSA.
In April 2018 I left the kingdom on final exit with my family and settled in Davanagere karnataka.and in the same year.
After a month I joined another company and staying alone. And my family is in India.
Since 2008 my father in law (wife’s father) taken money from me till 2013 .In fact he is running illegal real estate business. He promised my wife that he will give some properties from his business I have given 1.06 crores through bank and 65 lakhs by cash .He invested this money and made lot of money and properties
But he has given properties worth of Rs 125700 and Rs 174500 then he made all properties in his son’s name. Still he has to pay me Rs 15668500 plus interest or the properties worth of my balance money and interest.
Recently I came to know that he has made properties within his family transferred all the properties in his son’s name he has taken release deed from my wife and her 4 sisters.
The issues
1) Out of 2 properties one property is in litigation. A land measures 2.05 acres is encroached by another person and I have left with less than 1 acre. My father in law is not ready to resolve the issue as per sales deed.
2) I have to recover my money worth of 1.06 crores which I have given officially through bank from my wife’s NRE account.
I have the following issues
As we were living in Saudi Arabia as residents up to April 2018. I believe cause of action or limitation starts from April 2018 – correct me if I am wrong.
I have approached him several times but he never cares about my wife’s words I have no contact with him since 15 years. All the transactions happened through my wife.
I want to know whether the limitation is over or is it effective from April 2018.
Could you please help me with this issue and suggest a good advocate for me
138 cases
sir
accused borrowed an amount of Rs 1 lakh from the complainant as introduced by PW3 Complainant's witness.But the complainant filled the cheque for Rs 5 lakh and on dishonour of cheque filed case against accused for 5 lakhs, and complainant and PW3 gave evidence in support of that But the audio conversation record between the accused and PW3 produced and marked by the accused before the court shows that PW3 admit that only 1 lakh was given to the accused.What will be result?