john
30 September 2009 at 18:56
Dear Experts,
I got valuable advises in the same forum earlier, they gave much confidence to face the false complaint filed by my wife. The complaint filed on Jan'09. We got AB from H.C. Till now no FIR registered. Is there any time limit to file FIR after complaint. Can I get the complaint quashed based on delay? In the mean time local politician approached for negotiation. can I ask for a written statement from wife stating the complaint is false,attested by a Notary Public? or asked them to withdraw the complaint and get a mistake of facts certificate from police? or any other suggestions please.
arun
30 September 2009 at 15:45
respected members,
tell me brifly about sec. 30 of evidence act.
ashok prajapati
30 September 2009 at 08:45
cureption cases mai kitne din ke limite hoti hai chargsheet file kar ne ke? plzz its a urgent give me my answer
P.C. Joshi
29 September 2009 at 07:05
Dear Friends,
I need a brief action points to institute a criminal suit u/s 138 of N.I.A for dishonour of cheque beginning from dishonour of cheque till final order of the court. Would anybody like to share this inf. with this forum for the benefit of members.
Regards
P.C. Joshi
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
28 September 2009 at 22:33
through r.t.i. can i get bank detail of a person?
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
28 September 2009 at 21:56
sir, can bank give me account detail of that person who is accused in my n.i.act case.how?
rajvinder singh
28 September 2009 at 19:45
SIR MY CLIENT RECIEVED A DEMAND NOTICE FOR CERTAIN SUM OF RUPEES AS IT WAS MENTIONED IN THE NOTICE THAT I HAVE ISSUED A CHEQUE WHICH WAS RETURNED WITH BANK ENDORSEMENT OF A/C CLOSED.
MY CLIENT RECIVED THIS NOTICE FROM HIS TENANT.HIS TENANT FEW YEARS BACK DEPOSITED THE SUM OF RS. 1 LAC IN A/C OF HIS LANDLORD I.E. MY CLIENT.SAME WAS DEBITED BY MY CLIENT UPON HIS REQUEST.MY CLIENT DISPOSED OF ALL THE CHEQUES AND CLOSED HIS ACCOUNT AFTER THAT.
NOW WHEN HE GOT THE DEMAND NOTICE HE SUSPECTED THAT FEW CHEQUES WERE STOLEN BY HIS TENANT WHICH HE HAS USED TO GRAB HIM IN LITIGATION.
WE SAW THE CHEQUE IN THE COURT .THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IF SIGNATURES AND HANDWRITING.
COMPLAINANT IS SAYING THAT RS 1 LAC WAS TAKEN BY MY CLIENT FOR DISCHRGING HIS LIABILITY HE ISSUED THIS CHEQUE.
LANDLORD IS UNDER SUSPICISION REGARDING THE MISUSE OF OTHER CHEQUE WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN STOLEN BY THE TENAT.
SO TELL ME WHAT SHOULD BE THE FIREST STEP NOW
Avinash kumar seth
28 September 2009 at 18:53
please know me the name of the site from where i know the judgement regarding false and fabricated case.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
revision
dear members,
is order of bail u/s 437 cr.p.c. can be challenged under revision for cancletion of such order?