Anonymous
24 November 2009 at 19:17
If a case is filed U/s 138 INA in the court
& is registered but suddenly you have to go outside very urgently for a month. At such condition, Will court give time or wait for the complainant to come in the court sothat his statement canbe recorded before sending summon to the party (accused).
Anonymous
24 November 2009 at 19:08
If a legal notice is sent to the party through registered post on 15th day (last day ) since the day when cheque is dishonoured & informed by the bank & it reaches to the party on 16th or 17th day.
WILL IT BE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT AS A LEGAL NOTICE GIVEN WITHIN TIME PRESCRIBED FOR SENDING NOTICE OR INVALID NOTICE ?
Priyanka mehta
24 November 2009 at 18:27
Is there any judgement on section 498a and 306 of IPC for taking anticipatory bail?
REKHA JETLY
24 November 2009 at 14:59
I want to take an idea that if a case is filed u/s 138 INA in the court after expiry of notice period.
How much time it take to INITIATE the case by the court.
Anonymous
24 November 2009 at 00:12
what happen if a crimnal attec to a lawyer is this ny special law for lawyer
Tirumalesh sharma
24 November 2009 at 00:11
what happen if a crimnal attec to a lawyer is this ny special law for lawyer
Anonymous
23 November 2009 at 21:11
IF A PERSON DEPOSIT THE AMOUNT OF CHEQUE IN THE COURT(WHICH WAS DISHONORED/BOUNCED),CAN THAT PERSON STILL BE PUNISHED UNDER CRIMINAL CASE FILED UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I ACT ?
nitmuk
23 November 2009 at 21:11
hello all, i m urgently looking for some good lawyer in faridabad who is strong in handling 498a cases. I want to fight against it.
Any timely help would be highly appreciated.
thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
perjury evidence in civil suit
Sirs
If a person gives perjury evidence in a civil suit, the time limit within which criminal proceedings can be initiated.
Does the appeal also counted as the main suit for the above purpose or treated as a separate case?
Further information regarding this may be furnished.
A person has proved to be giving false evidence in the course of cross examination. Can he be permitted to continue? Is there any order/judgment pertaining to this?
Thanks
S.Arokiadoss