M.Dhanasekar
18 January 2010 at 13:00
Dear Rajeev Sir,
Thanks for your reply.
AS you said that the burden falls under the plantiff to prove that there was a partnership firm.Mr. Jyothiraman is having an unregistered partnership deed which specify the restaurant address and other partnership details.suppose if he produce such document then will that document will be accepted as an supporting document by the court.
Pls kindly tel me sir.
Thanking you,
yours,
M.Dhanasekar.
gopal dutt vyas
18 January 2010 at 08:37
a girl and her parents gave wrong information regarding body measurements of the girl to the groom and supplied photographs taken with tricks. the girl had claimed her measurements as 36 -26 -38 but actually the measurements were 31 -28 -35 which were known after marriage only. the husband is very much dis-appointed and feels cheated. what action can be taken in the matter ?
R/MEMBERS
IN A CASE OF GAMBLING ACT INSP/SHO WHO PREPARED CHALLAN/REPORT U/S 173 CRPC NEVER COME/STEPPED IN WITNESS BOX,EVEN HIS SIGNATURE WERE ALSO NOT IDENTIFIED BY INVESTIGATING OFFICER IN HIS COURT EVIDENCE.KINDLY ADVICE ME WHAT IS LEGAL PREPOSITION IN THE LIGHT OF THIS ABOVE ASPECT.tHANX
Ranganath
17 January 2010 at 22:28
Ld counsels,
In a criminal case instituted through police report, is it possible for accused to file objection before the criminal court before even examining the complainant to prove that the case is instituted by fraud by police.
In the case the charges are framed, now is the time to examine the complainant. Is it possible to file objection and seek for examination and cross examination of polcie in order to prove fraud.
If not when will such oppurtunity will be permitted.
Please clarify
Thanks.
Thank u very much mr. vishal & others for your valuable reply
Sir sec 265 K of Cr.P.C. (Plea of bargaining) envisage as "Statement or facts stated by accused under application of plea of bargaining, shall not be used for any other purpose except for the purpose of this chapter"
Sir my query is -
(1)if no solution is made out after bargaining, whether accused can be convicted even under this chapter on basis of his statement.
(2) what is the impact of reduced punishment or penalty after bargaining, on the character of accused. He would be called convicted or not?
Anonymous
16 January 2010 at 19:30
One of my friend who works in the state government department was arrested under section 7&13(2) and 13(1) of ipc act 1988. The charges are he has accepted the bribe to do some favour.
My question is can he be able to get the bail.
If found guilty what will be the punishment
the case is fabricated. and how can he prove this.
bank account closed - Stop payment by drawer - IS these categories are comes under 138 N.I. Act ?
sec 420,sec 506/2, sec 294
Dear RajKumar Sir,
Thanks for your reply.
As per your advice if i ask them for rendition of accounts,Mr. Jyothi raman will provide his duplicate bills stating the expenditure of building materials from the scrap about Rs.8,12,000 from M/s Sridevi associates. In such case could you please tel me the alternative.
When my brother applied for AB, I dont know why then the plantiff advocate said that it is a criminal case.section 506/2-represents criminal intimidation and 294-represents obscence which comes under criminal offence.
Another issue is why specifically my brother can take one plea.
Approximately How long will the case will survive?.
Suppose If the plantiff wins the suit and we dont have the paying capacity what shall be the out come and how to over come it sir.
Thanking you,
yours,
M.Dhanasekar