Anonymous
24 February 2010 at 00:52
I did not received any summon from the last 4 years. As per your instruction i had found out from PS about my case status and from there i have got to know that there is NBW of Dt. 3/3/10 is there.
Please explain
1. why there is warrant waiting for me when i did not received any summon or any kind of intimation from court or from PS?
2. Do i again need to go jail?????
I am going to meet a lawyer tomorrow but i am worried, Please help.
Thanking You
Adv. Virendra
24 February 2010 at 00:39
If any order is passed by the DIT (deptt. of Information and Technology) under IT Act 2000, can it be challenged in the Cyber Appellate Tribunal ?
or High Court ?
RAVI SHUKLA
23 February 2010 at 23:34
your article ANALYSIS OF SEC 354/355 OF IPC, you mention that the court took the oxford dictionary meaning of the word "modesty" in the matter of Rupal bajaj v/s KPS GILL.
I would like to know which court and which particular judge admitted the oxford dictionary meaning of the word "Modesty".
Thanks n rgds
Ravi Shukla
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
23 February 2010 at 19:30
what are the acts a juricidictions presently required to tagon to the mufasil(junior civiljudge&judicial first class )courts
Dr G V Rao
23 February 2010 at 19:26
Friends as posted earlier, my private complaint has been held to be barred by limitation since my first complaint made about the offense to the CBI in 2005 did not see the light of the day. My last communication with CBI was until October 2008. This strengthened the accused officials and they are continuing with the offenses even todate. I have argued effectively that limitation does not apply to "continuing offenses" but the Court has failed to accept my stand. Please help with Judgements or citations before Friday which can help me convince the Judge that for Criminal Cases limitation is no bar for continuing offenses. Please help me because this case will unearth nearly Rs 70 crores of public money misappropriated by Central Government Scientists.
Arvind Singh Chauhan
23 February 2010 at 18:13
"A" met to "B" and said to him that "A" is working in a company, which provides articles in cheap rate to small shop keeper in lieu of a one time deposit of Rs 2500/-. "A" assured to "B" that "B" may be an employee under "A", pay Rs 6000/- shall be paid to "B" and "B" has to make members. No appointment letter was issued to "B". "B" agreed and make some members in his relation also. In doing so "A" was also with "B" as a promoting officer to satisfy the people with the scheme. From the receipts which were given to the members some were bearing "A" signature and some were "B"'s signature. Receipt book is with "B".Later on A left the all dealing and said company has been closed. Now the people are asking money from "B". What action can be taken against "A" on behalf of "B" please advice. Whether recovery of money is possible?
GIRISH AGRAWAL
23 February 2010 at 14:37
RESPECTED EXPERTS....!!!!
I FILED RTI TO POLICE FOR GIVE ME A COPY OF GENERAL DAIRY RELATED MY WRITTEN COMPLAIN.
BUT POLICE DOES NOT GIVE ME COPY OF GENERAL DAIRY. HE SAID THAT THE GENREL DAIRY HAS BEEN A CONFIDANTIAL DOCUMENTS.
(PLEASE NOTE -I WANT TO DAILY GENERAL DAIRY NOT A CASE DAIRY )
WHAT CAN I DU ?
GIRISH AGRAWAL
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 12:57
is section 498A compoundable, if later the husband and wife files a petition for divorce on mutual consent and the petition is allowed.
Anonymous
23 February 2010 at 11:25
(i) whether an order directing framing of charge or framing charge, in a case attracting the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is an interlocutory order and (ii) whether such an order can be challenged by way of (a) Revision Petition or (b) petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or (c) petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
section 120 B
Is the section 120 B compoundable?