Anonymous
21 September 2010 at 13:49
We are pitted against corrupt BMC officers who are not even afraid of High Court and have made contempt court by not acting order of High Court in a petition for grant of permission to tenants u/s 499 of BMC Act.
There is criminal nexus between the new land lords who want our buildings to collapse and are neither repaiting them nor allowing tenants to under take repairs.
Can we directly file a criminal case against BMC officers in the MM's or will need govt. permission?
Pl. advice and help.
RAGHAVVVVV
21 September 2010 at 09:59
Dear all experts
My father was threatened of dire consequences and was forced to issue a cheque undated of Rs. 16.45 lacs to a company.When my father regained his senses,he immediately went to the Bank and stopped the bank for making the payment before the cheque was presented.The company then filled the date on his own,and presented the cheque for payment.but the cheque was returned by the bank saying "stop instruction".Now company has send us a notice to pay the entire amount within the 15 days otherwise they will file a suit under section 138 if N.I. Act which means either pay twice the amount or face 2 years punishment!
Please advise whether the company has legal right in doing so as mentioned above?
Also the cheque was made to sign on threatning basis but stopped immediately by my father?
Is this is not enough to protect my father from proceedings of section 138?
DEAR ALL EXPERTS
PLEASE ADVISE HOW CAN WE SAVE OURSELF FROM THIS SHREWD COMPANY?
THANKS AND REGARDS
Anonymous
21 September 2010 at 09:53
Kindly provide me with the citation wherein the Apex Court/High Courts have held that that in a Section 138 N I Act complaint it is unfair and prejudicial qua the accused if the bail amount is held equivalent to that of the cheque amount.
Thanking You in advance
Best Regards
Anonymous.
Anonymous
21 September 2010 at 01:04
can any college/school girl file a case against his classmate in the offence 'sexual harassment'.please tell me in detail with mentioning the applicable section.
meenakshi chauhan
21 September 2010 at 00:47
In the criminal case pending against my father, we have got signature verification report against us, from CFSL, GEQD. But we are not ready to believe that report because that person signed the documents in front of us, but as now he has managed this report against us, i am unable to understand what can be done to cancel this report. because anyhow we got to have the report done from some other laboratory but that too came against us. many officers told us that as the report is against u, no other lab will contradict the report easily, because all labs are of govt and are under one head.
can anyone help me out and tell what should we do to suppress that report and how ?
Thanks
arun joshi
20 September 2010 at 21:40
whether fileing of appln under sec 205 of crpc will bar fileing of anticipatory bail?
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 20:26
How many days shall take to get anticipatory Bail?
Anonymous
20 September 2010 at 19:51
Dear sir
My friend has been facing a false dowry and DV case in India. There are NBW issued against him as well as some orders issued to passport office for impounding the passport. He stays at Denmark. His visa expires in May 2011, whereas his passport is expirying in Nov 2010. will his passport be renewed? if yes what is the procedure.If no what should be done. He had challanged the NBW and impounding order of magistrate in DC which was rejected and now he has approached in HC thru a lawyer.please give guidance.
sachin sethi
20 September 2010 at 18:01
whether a person accused of an offence u/s 15 of NDPS Act, involving commercial quantity(yet to be declared as juvenile)can be granted interim regular bail u/s 437 or 439 Cr.P.C. for taking his examinations?
if anybody can help me with case law in this regard?
Sachin Sethi
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
299 Cr.P.C in 138 NI Case
82 and 83 Cr.P.C procedure followed . The accused are declared as Proclaimed offender. what next procedure ?
complainant Deposition u/s 299 crpc are maintainable ?
After deposition taken by court the Court issued new warrant u/s 138 N.I and 174A IPC is this procedure correct ot not ?