DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
23 October 2010 at 16:29
In NI 138 cheque bounce cases in notice and in complaint whether it is essential to give cheque no as well as bank account no.
1) If bank account no is not given and only cheque no is given , will it be fatal for the complaint.
2) If cheque no is not given and bank account no with name of the bank is given , is it sufficient.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
23 October 2010 at 16:27
In NI 138 cheque bounce cases in notice and in complaint whether it is essential to give cheque no as well as bank account no.
1) If bank account no is not given and only cheque no is given , will it be fatal for the complaint.
2) If cheque no is not given and bank account no with name of the bank is given , is it sufficient.
navin
23 October 2010 at 15:21
Respected sir,
In continuation of my queries
sir kindly suggest me four all four points
Adv. Deepak
23 October 2010 at 14:05
Resp. Members,
Under Section 138 NI Act, can one make specific prayer that the amount of cheque, which has been dishonoured, be paid to the complainant?
Please advise.
santhoshkumar
23 October 2010 at 13:38
respected sir
i am santhoshkumar from tamilnadu.on 25th august 2010 my mother was murdered.police arrest our family friend named c.mohanasamy on his statement he agree about the murder.behalf of his statement police arrest the other three mens who are involved in this murder.but now the three mens are coming in bail.the murders are try to compromise me with the help of police.the police men are try to cheat me.
i have no support in my side because my father also expired before 10 years. what can i do please any one help me
my contact number 9943070555
Anonymous
23 October 2010 at 13:36
respected sir
i am santhoshkumar from tamilnadu.on 25th august 2010 my mother was murdered.police arrest our family friend named c.mohanasamy on his statement he agree about the murder.behalf of his statement police arrest the other three mens who are involved in this murder.
but now the three mens are coming in bail.the murders are try to compromise me with the help of police.the police men are try to cheat me.
i have no support in my side because my father also expired before 10 years.
what can i do please any one help me
my contact number 9943070555
navin
23 October 2010 at 13:29
Respected sir,
in court application SUBMITTED BY MY WIFE
1)ADDRESS provided by wife is incomplete
2)information about my occupation is wrong
3)bills of jewellery submitted do not have VAT NO,DECLARATION,GOVT LICENSE NO,SALES TAX NO.AND SUCH OTHER THINGS IS THESE BILLS ARE COUNTED VALID IN COURT.
4)IN DV CASE CAN WE DEMAND NECESSARY DOCUMENTS THROUGH APPEAL IN COURT FROM MY WIFE SUCH AS BANK TRANSACTION ETC.
KIND FAVOUR NEEDED
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE
sushil
23 October 2010 at 12:34
respected sir,
a case was registered by me u/s 323,324,325 and 452.i want to know:
1)will the accused get bail under each section i.e. 323,324,325,452.
2)how much amount will he pay agains his bail u/s 452.
thanks
RAM KISHAN
23 October 2010 at 11:08
Please provide me All Rules & Act using For
I.P.C in India.
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 498
Section 498 of the IPC "Whoever takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of any other man, form that man, or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person, or conceals or detains with that intent any such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both."
In this section the words "with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person" I am not getting this words. Illicit Intercourse with whom, any person or with the person who takes, entices, conceals or detains or any means any person.
If any married woman left her husband matrimonial home without any reason and subsequently file petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty which is false allegations. In this somebody calling and try to convince to have divorce and helping her to have divorce and forcing and threatening her husband for divorce else ready for bad consequences, dose this case fit for takes u/s 498 against that person? I have proof that the person was calling her frequently for conveying for divorce no recording is available.
"With intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person" is it necessary to prove this in above case?