Tushar
11 November 2010 at 22:07
Hi,
Can i get the answer of the following questions as my office boy is giving exam of LLB and he dont have these answers.
1. Who is the Juvenile in conflict with law? State the provisions concerning relief of such on bail.
2. Short note on Employment of Juvenile or Child for begging.
3. Discuss the provision regarding Juvenile Justice Board and the procedure and power of the Juvenile Justice Board.
indhra
11 November 2010 at 20:07
dear sir some gunda forcibly taken wrong signature on 2 cheques from now they a case against me i already filled criminal on them i went to dcp and cp also nothing was they nt taking any action pls suggest me how come out from this case
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 18:49
bank recovered vehicle thereafter the bank claim any further amount through post dated cheques
Sumir
11 November 2010 at 18:45
Is there a prescribed form for complaining to Maharashtra Lokayukta and upalokayukta?
Do we have to accompany affidavit?
whats the fees that has to be paid by complainant to Lokayukta and upalokayukta?
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 15:47
498A has been filed against the boy's family in chennai.The case is in bangalore.Police has submitted final report.Do all the 5 persons accused in the chargesheet have to attend the trial? is there any way to avoid all 5 from attending the court during trial? kindly give your views.
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 14:28
when wife has fabricated list of stridhan with huge golden and silver ornaments and utensils and made huge false statement with dishonest claim for per month alimoney and mental and physical damages / harassment a conpensation of rs. 200000/-.
is it possible to give complaint in the same court under ipc sec 191 to 211?
in which court the complaint can be given
1. trial court?
2. same statements also file in district court for enhancement of interim order of rs. 2000/ to 10000/-
or
3. same positions will be continued upto supreme court--
which court will take congnizance against her in the given sections?
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 14:20
My very dear friend is framed in a cyber crime (Criminal Case) and charges u/s 292, 420, 474, 471 and many including forging documents etc has been framed against him. Now the matter is extortion is also there. The complainant now want to withdraw charges and want to settle the matter with the accused and ready to file an affidavit to that effect. Complainant wants all property which has been seized from accused should be given to him which accused also agreed.
Now, I want to know that even the above affidavit etc are submitted to the Judge whether considering the mutual settlement between accused and complainant, the Judge will release the accused from all the charges framed against him? Someone told me some supreme court directive is there for such cases.
Can any one competent person truly advise me and guide me? Matter very urgent.
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 11:21
dear experts,
while reading crpc 310 it is as under-
310. Local inspections.
(1) Any Judge or Magistrate may, at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding, after due notice to the parties, visit and inspect any place in which an offence is alleged to have been committed, or any other place which it is in his opinion necessary to view for the purpose of properly appreciating the evidence given at such inquiry or trial, and shall without unnecessary delay record a memorandum of any relevant facts observed at such inspection.
(2) Such memorandum shall form part of the record of the case and if the prosecutor, complainant or accused or any other party to the case, so desires, a copy of the memorandum shall be furnished to him free of cost
can an application be given to trial court to visit the place?
if the court rejects to visit then what to do?
another sec 349 read as under-
349. Imprisonment or Committal of person refusing to answer or produce document.
If any witness or person called to produce a document or thing before a Criminal Court refuses to answer such question as are put to him or to produce any document or thing in his possession or power which the Court requires him to produce, and does not, after a reasonable opportunity has been given to him so to do, offer any reasonable excuse for such refusal such Court may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, sentence him to simple imprisonment or by warrant under the hand of the presiding Magistrate or Judge commit him to the custody of an officer of the Court for any term not exceeding seven days, unless in the meantime, such person consents to be examined and to answer, or to produce the document or thing and in the event of his persisting in his refusal he may be dealt with according to the provisions of section 345 of section 346.
question is -
is it possible to apply trial court to give directions to the complaintant to produce the documents of property what she has given on oath in her statement-
it is never possible to her to given any property document as it is not in existance and the statement is totally false along with another false allegation
what to do if trial court rejects to appeal to give directions to produce the documentary evidences?
my another question is that on that basis can perjury with crpc 340 will be susscessful?
Anonymous
11 November 2010 at 11:12
A multinational bank filed a suit against me u/s. 138 in August 2005 after depositing one of the blank cheque given as security and the suit is still pending in the court.
In February 2010 the bank deposited another blank cheque (for the dues already under consideration of the Ld. Magistrate + interest there upon) and sent a notice u/s. 138 (as per the advise of the friends in this forum, I never replied the notice) and no summon was received for the same.
In April 2010 I received another notice from the legal representatives of the bank to settle the outstanding dues (which is already under consideration of the Ld. Magistrate since 2005) or otherwise face legal action.
I would like to know from friends that can this action be termed as Contempt of Court, is their any remedy.
Thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
need help under section12(A)domestic violence
Dear sir,
my dvc case filled now as jury said "ab case hoga" to me and my wife after 8 dates given by the court.
may i know the difference before and after
i tried several times to say my words that my wife had submitted wrong information in the application regarding address,my work,her address,etc but jury had never given me chance to say every time her lawyer says and jury gives next date. why that so?
steps what happened
1)called in court onbehalf of notice
2)say submitted but applicant was absent
3)jury called for arguement
4)on arguement date applicant lawyer said applicant is ready to stay with him.
5)jury decided date for counselling
respondent send a message to applicant that he wants to talk but no reply from applicant side.before counsselling date
6)on counselling date applicant lawyer said applicant donot want to go for counselling.
taken next date
7)jury asked matter setteled in counselling
applicant said respondent is sending messages full of threat but "it is wrong"
jury said "ab case hoga"and given next date
may i know what's going on with me.
kind help is needed
thank you