Anonymous
16 December 2010 at 06:14
Details as given below:
June-06 got married
2 months later her father came to home and ask for 2 lacs for some personal reason(Denied by me showing inabilities)
1 bike received in marriage(without papers)
Papers were received after 3 months of marriage and the same were by the name of some other person(not even relative of her family)
When received paper an another demand was raised for 1.5 lacs by father in law(denied by me showing inabilities)
Then started teaching his doughter. She even took some medicines to abortion. She left home in my absence in July-07 and her father stopped installment of the bike which I was given on marriage.
Ther person came to my home and threatned me to pay installments of bike and fulfill the demands of my in laws.
Complaint for the same givn to SP through Telegram in September-07 against in-laws and the person by whom the bike was registered. No action was taken on that telegran and a departmental is running agains them.
she came back in Feb-08 and geve birth to a female child. then again she left home in the night of Dec-2008 and registered FIR u/s 498A/323/342 and 325/406/506 were added later.
I registerd complaint for her missing in my poloce station.
Also 125 also filed by her and interim to be decided in next date(arguments not done till now)
498A Case is running in witness stage. Please help me in this regard.
Baskar
15 December 2010 at 21:54
Sir, I was accused of cheque return & case was filed against me in 138 NI Act. I won the case. This Cheque was originally issued to the scribe of this case. But he filed case on me on his cousin brother's name as compliantant. These are the following points that magistrate wrote in the Judgement.
1.No legal liability arises.
2.Attestor said that pronote was blank when he attested.
3.Scribe Has made statement in court that he knew all the transactions but before trial started the same scribe has given me a written advocate notice that he doesn't know any of this transaction.
4.Three different inks was used.
I need to know that can I sue the complainant & Scribe who are brothers who wantedly filed a case on me to get the monetary benefit. If yes what type of case shall I file against them.
VIJAY K. TEOTIA
15 December 2010 at 20:52
In a complaint case, accused were summoned but the same was not served. through some source it came to the knowledge of accused about pending criminal complaint case and summoning by the court. accused engaged advocate and advocate applied for certified copy. after copy criminal revision filed along with application for condonation of delay. it was almost 04 month since summoning when revision filed. DJ court admitted appeal and called for record from lower court. the court issued notice to complainant and before going further heard on delay condonation. my question is whether delay condonation is required since summons were not served and revision filed immediately after obtaining order.
Anonymous
15 December 2010 at 20:34
In case, charge sheet submitted u/s 420/467/468/471, whether accused can apply through his advocate for discharge u/s 239 without obtaining bail. Whether magistrate has power to hear such application . What favourable or adverse order can be passed by the court.
Anonymous
15 December 2010 at 20:31
In case, charge sheet submitted u/s 420/467/468/471, whether accused can apply through his advocate for discharge u/s 239 without obtaining bail. Whether magistrate has power to hear such application . What favourable or adverse order can be passed by the court.
ksvrajuadv
15 December 2010 at 20:30
Accused borrowed money Rs 45000/from complainant in the year of 2005 by cheque.Accused gave blank cheque to complainant widout signature,widout date & widout any amount.complainnat put himself accuesed signature,Ist added date14/11/05 &then added date 14/12/06.complainant pesented said cheque for clearance through her bankers on 13/6/2007,but the same was returned wid remarks IN SUFFICIENT FUNDS.Plz suggest me what r the chances of accused,whether he win his case & on what grounds.
Baskar
15 December 2010 at 19:44
Sir, I was accused of cheque return & case was filed against me in 138 NI Act. I won the case. These are the following points that magistrate wrote in the Judgement.
1.No legal liability arises.
2.Attestor said that pronote was blank when he attested.
3.Scribe Has made statement in court that he knew all the transactions but before trial started the same scribe has given me a written advocate notice that he doesn't know any of this transaction.
4.Three different inks was used.
I need to know that can I sue the complainant & Scribe who are brothers who wantedly filed a case on me to get the monetary benefit. If yes what type of case shall I file against them.
Anonymous
15 December 2010 at 19:43
C; the Complainant RV: an advocate KMS: Jr. to RV P: Govt employee B: Govt employee
The complainant in his complaint says "RV informed him that P and B are demanding money to do his work. Then C alongwith RV went nd met them ona date. P and B demanded money failing which the work will bedelayed."
The date which he is mentioning is totally false. no one met him on that date neither earlier nor later.No money was demanded from RV by both govt employees. here the complainan fails to mention the date on which RV told him. The date on which he alleges to have met the place and who arraned for thi meeting etc..
In his stttment given later on he states that "the date on which he met the govt employees the ovt employees discussed someting in their mother tongue with RV andf RV informed him that they are demanding . the language in which they discussed which he did not understand"
after two days RV takes KM and P to the complainant place and introduces them to C. Pl note that voice transcription memo shows that introduction takes place on this day. so it is proved that earlier C did not meet anyone. In this meeting KM intorduces himself as govt employee. later on KM accepts the money. RV under fear says this money is mean for B and P. thereafter he contacts B. KM hands over the tainted poart in the hands iof B. since B is Partially blind and cannot see with left eye KM utilises this point and hands over thru left part. upon handing over B was caught . The B then hands over the same to P by saying it is ur money and I dont know how much it is.
Now chargesheet is filed . Earlier B, P and KM were arrested/ Nmae of B was not in the FIR. In the fir they have stated that prima facie offence on behalf of KM and P is registred. Now the position is B, P, KM and RV all are chargesheeted. Now what will happen in the trial court and How B can protect himself. B hss neiher demanded from C,KM,P or RV
Anonymous
15 December 2010 at 18:40
If wife of a husband after leaving matrimonial home, having signed MOU for Divorce, but not obtained decree of divorce from the Court, start living with another person under live-in-relationship and sharing bed with that person, of which ex-husband has proof, can ex-husband take action u/s 498 of the IPC against that person with whom wife is living under live-in-relationship?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
malicius prosecution
I was acquited by MM and HC in a false 138 case. How much time do I get for filing cases against complainant for defamation/damages ?