Sailesh Kumar Shah
31 January 2013 at 11:37
R/Sirs,
In the Case of Delhi Airtech Services Vs. State of U.P. (2011) 8 SCLR 064. The supreme court division bench order that
"In view of the divergence of opinion on conclusions and also on various legal questions discussed in two separate judgments by us, the matter is required to be placed before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India for reference to a larger Bench to resolve the divergent views expressed in both the judgments and to answer the questions of law framed."
If any one have any update about pendency/disposal of above matter by the larger bench of the Supreme Court, please provide details.
Thanks & Regards,
Adv. Shailesh Kr. Shah
Abhay Ahuja
31 January 2013 at 11:24
I have filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court. The same has been admitted and notice has been served. What will happen on the next date? When will the counter affidavits be filed?
Sivanesan
31 January 2013 at 02:23
Dear Sir,
Recently i started new political party in chennai.
I would like to register my political party in election commission . can anyone help me to register my political party in chennai?
Manish
29 January 2013 at 10:11
SIR/MADAM
I have applied for obc non creamy layer certificate in durg district, chhattisgarh. My father is employed in SAIL - bhilai steel plant ie PSU, as sr. operator cum technician which is a non-executive post salaried above rs 4.5 lakh/ annum. concern authority is not willing to issue the certificate on the ground that my father is exceeding limit of 4.5lakh/annum income criteria ignoring the fact that he is getting it through a salaried income which is exempted under the current law.
Also not a single person in superior position is taking interest in this matter and responding positively.
what should I do?kindly guide me....
sangee
28 January 2013 at 03:52
greetings...
i belong to sc caste and my husband belongs to MBC,We got married last march and our marriage is registered,i have completed my mba(regular)working for private company,Kindly assist me in applying for govt jobs and elaborate me on provided govt quoto for intercaste
truelife
25 January 2013 at 10:01
I came through one of the muslim case,where a 99% Muslim village Jamaat is acting like khap and harassing the villagers and due to fear not a single person complains about it.This Jamaat has been registered as society and have started using this as NGO too.So my question is :- Is there any law to report about about this jamaat. What is the legal way to end this Jamaat.Is the legal rights taken away by Jamaat is they socially boycott villagers.Please help ..
RAJAN
24 January 2013 at 18:00
Dear Sir, Irequest your help in this aspect. Please suggest me for the Suits for which numbers should not be assiged / allocated by Courts & the suits for which numbers shoulb be assigned by courts.
Thanks,
Rajan
Vijay Bali
24 January 2013 at 14:14
Appeal is a 'Substantative Statue' - Please Elaborate / Comment......
sanjay
22 January 2013 at 23:56
dear members,
( answers with case law will help me out a lot )
Arjun, a native of Trivandrum, is a young automobile engineer, graduated from a leading Engineering
College in the State of Kerala. Though he belonged to a poor Hindu traditional family, he was able to
secure a scholarship for his studies. During the final semester, he got placement in Volkswagen India
Ltd through campus selection. After a period of six months training, he joined as Junior Engineer in
Volkswagen India Ltd, New Delhi in July 2007. In early 2010, a flat worth 50 lakhs at New Delhi, was
bought by Arjun in mother's name, using his savings, disposing of all family properties at Trivandrum,
and also by availing a loan from a nationalized bank. By the end of July 2010, he started living at New
Delhi along with his family including his mother, a widow. And his maternal uncle, an old man who
was taking care of his cancer affected and partially paralised mother. On 15-3-2011 Arjun married
Gowthami, a member of middle class Brahmin family. At that time she was working as a ‘flight steward’
in a leading airline company. After a month of marriage, Arjun started quarrelling with Gowthami over
Gowthami’s relationship with one Mr. Pranav, a Flight Engineer. Pranav used to visit Gowthami and the
same was objected to by mother and uncle. Gowthami used to quarrel with mother and uncle over the
matter. On 25-4-2011, Gowthami filed a complaint under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence
Act, 2005 and secured a Residence Order against Arjun and his maternal uncle. The Order directed
them to vacate the house and transfer possession to Gowthami and the same was disturbed over the
developments and lost interest in work in the company, as he was not working efficiently, he was given
a compulsory leave for six months. He this found it difficult to pull on as financial problems disturbed
him.
In the meantime Arjun received notice from the financial institution for defaulting installments of the
house loan. He approached the magistrate court for a modification of residence order for allowing him
to pay debts to financial institution and also to spend money for care of his mother.
When the uncle was kept away from the mother, there was virtually nobody to take care of her. Her
health deteriorated and was badly in need of medical and nursing care. Gowthami was not interested
in these matters. The mother contacted a lawyer through Arjun for legal remedy. The lawyer advised
her to approach District Collector for medical help as a primary step. Then she wrote a letter to Dist
Collector to make available services of her brother. The collector informed that on account of the court
order, he was not in a position to help her, the mother then filed a write petition through the lawyer
against the collector alleging violation of right to medical care, while the petition was pending, mother
became totally paralysed with nobody to take care of her.
The High Court appointed a medical professional to report on the health conditions of the petitioner
immediately. To the medical professional, mother reveled that she intended to die on account of her
illness. In the Report the Commission favoured euthanasia as she was suffering from unbearable pain
and no chance of recovery. The High Court brought the pending case from magistrate court to it and
sent notices to parties. Meanwhile the lawyer amended the petition seeking euthanasia for the mother.
what is the constitutionality of
relevant provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, euthanasia, right to medical
care, right to property, and right to life.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Why helping poor people is not a fundamental duty in indian constitution?????
first and foremost duty of all men and women is to help poor and distress people. living a life for own benifit is not a life. living a life for other's benifit is a true life. living a life to help poor , needy,distress people is a proper life. so one should live a life for other people mainly for poor and distressed people's benifit. every body should help poor and distreessed people.
this should be another fundamental duty in INDIAN CONSTITUTION.
GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE A STRINGENT LAW IN WHICH EVERY CITIZEN(EVERY MAN AND WOMAN) WHO ARE DOING JOBS HAS TO DONATE ATLEAST 25% OF THEIR INCOME COMPULSORILY.
FOR THIS GOVERNMENT HAS TO MAKE A PROJECT IN WHICH EVERY CITIZEN WHO ARE DOING JOBS HAS TO DONATE MONEY TO THE GOVERNMENT. AND THEN GOVERNMENT WILL SEND THESE MONEY TO THE POOR PEOPLE