Ranjeet Singh chauhan
10 May 2013 at 22:00
Hi Scolars,
I am soclai worker based in Faridabad, Harynaa and seek your assistance to track this trail order for my research. I tried all possible ways but could not find the order copy.
Newspaper cutting is attached for more detail.
Order Dated: 9/4/2013 by A division bench headed by Chief Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri the Punjab and Haryana High Court has appointed three committees, one each for Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh, to go “into the accounts of the schools and find out the reasonableness of increase in fees by the schools”.
Ranjeet Singh
9213284009
Dr Sangh Mittra
10 May 2013 at 13:03
Sir,
What is the implication if the Land Acquisition Officer does not serve the individual notice to the Land owner under Section 9(4) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894?
Is India even now to be treated as Bengal Presidency in which Land Acquisition Act was sought to be implemented?
Can the State Government acquiring Land of the Soldiers and others not residing in the boundaries of the said State be held to be justified and legally correct by the mere Publication of the Notifications under Section 4 and 6 in the regional Newspapers and in the Gazette of the State Government?
Is the Law really blind and paraplegic as the Land Acquisition Act 1894 is still be applied in the spirit of the Nineteenth Century in India and amended during emergency when the Right to Property was taken off and of the eighties when the Land of the farmers and soldiers was to be gobbled up for SEZs.
Is there no Lawyer in the Country and or no Judge who may ask the State Government acquiring Lands to give wide publicity to the Notifications of Acquisition in the manner that all land owners or their relations come to know of it and at least file objections /
Is there any legal remedy for a Soldier/ Civil Servant whose residential piece of Land was acquired by Notifications under Section 4 and 6 published in the regional Newspapers and Gazette of the State in 2007 and 2008 and award made in 2010 of which the Soldier was not even informed under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act/
How long should the said Soldier keep corresponding with the State Government to get reply as to why was he denied the opportunity of hearing under the circumstances and why was he not served Notice under Section 9(4) of the Land Acquisition Act/
If he files the Petition will the first Petition not go waste as the Hon’ble Court would ask the state to consider and reply to the Petitions of the Soldier made from 2010 onwards?
Can the soldier ask for relief in the form of the de-notification of his residential plot on the basis of the Judgment of the High Court in which the Notifications under Section 4, 6 and Award qua the plot adjacent to the plot of the Soldier , falling in the same Khasra and Khatauni been quashed by the Court in the Judgment dated 5.5.2011 9 for which the soldier has been requesting the state Government to give him the relief?
The said Judgment can be read from the follwing link
http://lobis.nic.in/phhc/casetype1.php?scode=28&fflag=1
RS Sahni
09 May 2013 at 14:07
Dear Sir,
One of my cousins (woman) is employed as a Nurse cum Midwife in Health Department of Uttar Pradesh. She was living separately from her first husband before he visited her in 1999. She claimed that her husband was impotent and alcoholic. In 2000, she got married by exchanging flower garlands(without Saptpadi and Havana)to another man who is employed as Havildar in CRPF Central Reserve police Force). She has a 10 years old daughter (borne in 2002.
She quarreled with one of her neighbors who has told her that her second marriage was illegal and he will report it.
Is her second marriage illegal? What shall be the consequences if this is reported by somebody? How shall her employment and of her second husband be affected.
Kindly help her by giving your precious opinion.
Regards.
amra kazmi
09 May 2013 at 00:27
Sir, a person's writing hand is fractured before the exam and he has not been provided any writer in the examination (for a government office ,based on the pattern of UPSC) to write on his behalf, because there is no provision in the rules regarding the grant of writer to a candidate,it amounts to the violation of Article 16 clause 1 of creating constitutional right of equal opportunity n matters of public employment?
khokan majumdar
06 May 2013 at 15:15
Respected sir,
As per legal aspect who is having more authority - president or secretery of a flat owners society? pl.advice.
Regards
Pranab majumdar
rahul panwar
06 May 2013 at 12:51
sir i am monocular person that mean i have 30 person vision disability.according to rule i am not considered disable because i have less than 40 percent disability sir, i want to know
any govt job recruitment anyone disqualify me on the base of eye problem and what are legal procedure regarding of it. i am not considered these jobs like police or navy
Harish Chauhan
03 May 2013 at 22:21
18. उपाधियों का अंत--(1) राज्य, सेना या विद्या संबंधी सम्मान के सिवाय और कोई उपाधि प्रदान नहीं करेगा।
(2) भारत का कोई नागरिक किसी विदेशी राज्य से कोई उपाधि स्वीकार नहीं करेगा।
(3) कोई व्यक्ति, जो भारत का नागरिक नहीं है, राज्य के अधीन लाभ या विश्वास के किसी पद को धारण करते हुए किसी विदेशी राज्य से कोई उपाधि राष्ट्रपति की सहमति के बिना स्वीकार नहीं करेगा।
(4) राज्य के अधीन लाभ या विश्वास का पद धारण करने वाला कोई व्यक्ति किसी विदेशी राज्य से या उसके अधीन किसी रूप में कोई भेंट, उपलब्धि या पद राष्ट्रपति की सहमति के बिना स्वीकार नहीं करेगा।
But rape victim whose news (mentioned below )had got/selected for reward from united states as per news below
Can her family got permission from president to get award from united states?
First Lady Michelle Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry awarded the International Women of Courage Award to nine women.
WASHINGTON, D. C., United States
Known to India and the world as “Nirbhaya” (fearless), the 23-year-old physiotherapy intern whose brutal gang-rape on a moving bus in Delhi in December inspired widespread protests, has been posthumously presented with the International Women of Courage Award.
"Her bravery inspired millions of women and men to come together with a simple message: No more. No more looking the other way when gender-based violence happens. No more stigma against victims or survivors," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said at a State Department event held March 8 to honor women from across the globe with the prestigious International Women of Courage Award.
The award was presented to the brave young girl posthumously. None of her family members was present on the occasion. Indian Ambassador to the U.S. Nirupama Rao was present at the award ceremony in which eight others were presented with the award.
In a rare gesture, Kerry asked the jam-packed auditorium to stand and join him in a moment of silence for “Nirbhaya,” whom he described as "brave, big hearted and fearless."
"Nirbhaya's fight survives her. For inspiring people to work together to end violence against women in India and around the world by displaying immense courage in demanding
justice, and with great sadness, we honor Nirbhaya as a woman of exceptional courage, and we honor her posthumously," Kerry said at the function presided over by First Lady Michelle Obama.
Read more at http://www.indiawest.com/news/9642-u-s-honors-delhi-gang-rape-victim-with-courage-award.html#u3OhiTev3ToFqQzG.99
Radhakrishnan K.V.
02 May 2013 at 23:30
What could be the provisions of BR Act 1949 mentioned in the 3rd provso of Clause 243ZL which is as follows:-
"Provided also that in case of a co-operative society carrying on the business of
banking, the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 shall also apply:"
Shalini Sharma
02 May 2013 at 17:28
can a writ 226 be filed against private company for mismanagement and oppression
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Law regarding indefinite strike?
i would like to know from our respected expert, whether there is any law regarding indefinite strike against any law or bill continuously for 45.days, then the Hon'ble court may stay that law or bill for 3.years,
if yes as per which provision and law, and no so at what basis.
Thanks for valuable suggestion!!!