Khumana Ram Jangid
21 November 2013 at 22:47
Cl.(3) of Art. 320 of the Constitution makes it obligatory that UPSC or the PSC shall be consulted in the matters enumerated therein. Proviso thereto authorises the President/Governor to dispense with such consultation by making Regulations. Cl. (5) of Art. 320 then prescribes laying down of such Regulations before Parliament/Legislature but there is no provision as to effect of non-compliance of cl. (5). What is the legal effect if there is non-compliance of cl.(5)?
Amir Bala
20 November 2013 at 19:50
i am a muslim boy, I love a hindu girl and want to marry her.
she is ready to convert to islam, what is the legal procedure for us to marry?
and what are the legal issues we can face?
Arvind
19 November 2013 at 18:53
Sir, I am working in education institute as a security guard. The institute comes under ‘Autonomous Institute under the DIPP’ Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt of India. Now days we are facing a problem that to who is authorize for our salute, (A) Director of the institute (B)Head of Security Department(C)Security Coordinator (not security officer) (D)Center Heard of Campus (E)Asst. Administrative officer (F)Administrative officer (G)Secretary & Head General Administration.
vishal mahajan
16 November 2013 at 07:22
Is SDM legally authorised to pass a decree on maintenance issues ( maintenance from husband to wife ). Judgement passed to defence unit.
Yogesh
13 November 2013 at 08:37
I am in position to file PIL, I have done planning to file by e-filing way of Supreme Court, but I have some of following problems, I expected guideline of expert.
I am facing some problem in E-filing options, ( http://sc-efiling.nic.in/sc-efiling/index.html )the point are given below.
1) Which “Dealing section” I choose in numbers of option given for Dealing Section ?
2) What is mean by “Point of Low”, What can I right here, Can I right here Grounds of my PIL which I disclosed in PIL petition drafting.
3) What can I choose in “Petition is against” where three option are given, as 1) Interlocutory, 2) Final Order, 3) Decree.
4) What is mean by Caveator ?
5) In Act details, Can I right here that I am filling PIL under article 32, and on grounds of 16(1) & 51A(h) OF THE CONSTITUTIION OF INDIA like that.
6) What is mean by Vakalatnama?
I know some of expert knows something about my case, whatever for details you may go with following web.
https://www.change.org/petitions/president-of-india-save-grassroots-innovators-researcher-make-self-dependant-india-decrease-import
Please Guide me !
Yogesh
10 November 2013 at 13:06
I am drafting a PIL for the rights of Innovator and Researcher of India.
The respondent of my case is
Department of Science & Technology
Now give me clarification which method is proper between following two ways to show as respondent in my PIL
Method No 1
Secretary, Department of Science & Technology,
Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi – 110016
Method No 2.
Union of India,
Through Secretary, Department of Science & Technology,
Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi – 110016
There are some questions in my mind,
1) What is the difference between that above two methods to show as respondent?
2) Which method is proper and why?
3) Give me some more general information about this issue please.
Yogesh
09 November 2013 at 15:24
I want to file PIL (Public Interest Litigation), in the matter of rights of Innovator and Researcher, on the legal ground of “under the Article 16(1) & Article 51A(h) in The Constitution Of India”.
But I am confusing, which is appropriate court for my case either Supreme Court or High Court, if you see there are two legal grounds of my case one is concern with Fundamental rights and another is Fundamental duty.
I also inform you that, this is the truth something going wrong with Innovator and Researcher of our India, but it’s going critical to find with reference to legal grounds.
The matter concerned with all Indian Innovator and Researcher, the directly beneficiary are Indian Innovator and Researcher not to the particular any state that’s the point, and indirectly beneficiary are whole India, in short the matter is not concern with particular any state of India.
In that of case which court is proper either SC or HC.
Confused because Article 51A(h) is not concern with Fundamental rights. Than can I applicable in SC because according to my basic understanding, SC deals with only for Fundamental rights of part 3 of constitution. This is the confusion about SC.
I confused about HC, because the power of HC applicable in only state level, and the matter of my case is concern with all Indian Innovator and Researcher. According to my basic understanding, I think HC not applicable to take any order at national level, that the confusion about HC.
There are two responds, both offices available in Delhi, one respondent is “PM” and another is “Department of Science and Technology”
For proper details of my petition kindly go with following web link,
http://www.change.org/petitions/president-of-india-save-grassroots-innovators-researcher-make-self-dependant-india-decrease-import
Please guide me; I am doing with pure mind and pure hand.
vimal Kumar
05 November 2013 at 13:23
Hi,
I recently applied for my Passport renewal and received my renewed Passport.
Police Post verification was initiated, after the stipulated three weeks when the police did not contact me I contacted the concerned Police station, they told me that they have not received the documents from Passport office. On contacting the Passport Office I was informed that Police report has been received by them saying Address mentioned is wrong.
Passport office has resend documents again for Re-Verification. This according to the concerned Police station has not been received by them yet.
I have to go abroad urgently for six months on a company assignment.
Can I travel abroad before the Police Post verification is done?
What procedures should I follow to avoid any problems in future?
Than You very much
Regards,
VimalKumar.
subhaschandra
03 November 2013 at 12:11
sir,
I filed an case against the Govt of karnataka and Accountant General and Deputy Director of Treasury in the year 2006 challenging the order passed by them reducing the pay by an increment and ordering recovery of excess payment on the ground that my pay has been wrongly fixed in the year 1994 that is after 12 years and that too without giving notice.
But matter has so far not come up for hearing in the KAT as I have now already retired
Question is whether should i with draw the case and put up with loss of one increment? If So what is other legal remedies available other than waiting to conclude the case in the KAT so that i can get back one increment denied to me from the year 2006?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Eligibilty for obtaing obc certificate (ncl)
Hi Experts
I am vikarm sahu age 26 working in private company, and also looking for job in government sector, but I don't know whether i am eligible for obtaining OBC certificate.
As my caste listed in the central list OBC but even though i have doubt i.e. AS my father was employed/joined in the Indian Airforce as Airmen(lower rank) after 20 year of service he has been promoted to JWO(junior warrant officer) , which comes under group B officers with class-II gazetted status and later retired holding MWO (master warrant officer) position in the same group B.
Now I would like to know whether i am Eligible to obtain OBC NCL certificate or not
Please advise