adv.abhay s. patil
10 November 2009 at 14:39
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Anonymous
10 November 2009 at 14:34
Sir, in maharashtra last month assambly election was finished.
in that election notification was published on 18/9/2009 and last date to filed nomination was 25/9/2009.
but after 25/9/2009 one voters supplimentry list was published in my vidhansabha sang.that list was published on 28/9/2009.4500 and more voters vote from that last list.
and my query is that ---
-- Weather that voter list is valid?
-- Is any ony from that last published list can get relif from court 'that he have not get the chance to contest election because election commession published that list after the last date of nomination?
-- Is the second runup candidate can filed a petition against election commession on this ground undrs representative of people act sec.23(3)?
Plese support me and answer me.
Anonymous
07 November 2009 at 13:23
i just want to know about ....The Right of children to free and complusory education bill...passed b our parliament..........that from when it will come in to operation.....................
and i need the copy of bill?
1- To what an extent govt canbe made liable to provide free educaton?
2-- What is the procedure to get the benefit of this law?
3- can the financial stable people also claim the right of free education for their ward?
---------------plz guide me as soon as possible...........its very urgent.........
Ayusman Mahanta
06 November 2009 at 23:37
can fundamental right of a child(under 15yrs) be violated under article 21,19(2)and 39(f), if exposed to obscenity in print media? For ex Ajay Goswami v. Union of India.Can obscenity in print media so grave to children that it can raise a question on freedom of press.I need some strong points for moot court.
PJANARDHANA REDDY
04 November 2009 at 22:56
1. Hon'ble Shri K.G. Balakrishnan, Chief Justice of India
2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia
3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee
4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir
5. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran
6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari
7. Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain
8. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju
9. Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar
10. Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Sudershan Reddy
11. Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam
12. Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi
13. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Alam
14. Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. M. Panchal
15. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma
16. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph
17. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly
18. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha
19. Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.L. Dattu
20. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Verma
21. Hon'ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan
22. Assets of Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal, since retired on 15.10.2009, on special request.
The above declaration of assets is purely on voluntary basis.
Ayusman Mahanta
04 November 2009 at 17:04
1.what is principle of uniformity?
2.under what proviso SC frames issues on matters of wit petiton under article 32.Is order 14,rule 1 of cpc applies to SC while framing issues,when petion is under artcle 32.
3.Is it mandatory for SC to accepts the persuasive authority of lower courts.
Pradeep
04 November 2009 at 12:14
Hi,
As per my knowledge, National song and NAtional anthem enjoy equal status in the constitution of india. but i am unable to trace the exact provision in the constitution or any other legislation specifically stating this. Government of India's official site also says that thsy enjoy equal status, but doesn't quote any legal authority for the same. (see http://india.gov.in/knowindia/national_song.php)
(Addendum - in view of recent fatwa issued against Vande Mataram)
Section 3 of the THE PREVENTION OF INSULTS TO NATIONAL HONOUR ACT, 1971 punishes individuals from preventing of singing National anthem, but it is applicable only for national anthem, but not the national song. unless we can quote a legal authority giving equal status to both, we cannot apply this section for preventing the singing of National Song.
Provisions of National Hounour Act -
s.3. Prevention of singing of Indian National Anthem, etc. Whoever intentionally prevents the singing of the Indian National Anthem or causes disturbance to any assembly engaged in such singing shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
can anyone advise me upon the same..
Anonymous
02 November 2009 at 13:15
mr a is a bank officer and he is allegely inovlved in a bribe case and the matter was enquired in the cbi court and judgment came against mr.a and the bank dismissed him from service long back. at that time he was not paid anything and since then he is not getting any exgratia ftrom the bank. this happened eitht yearsback and mr. a also kept quiet as he did not want to extend the litigation and went for appeal in thigh court and the case is still pending
what is his right under constitutional law to live and maintgain his family without any source of income. he is neither getting any benfefit nor any pension he stuggled all these eight yers and without the kknowledge of thelaw and fear of inviting more problems and no guidanance to him as per constitutional law, has he any right undercontitutional alw to get back his benefits from thenationalised bank
kindly advise him and if possible please refer a good and famous advocate in hyhderabd
thank yousir
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Privileges!? of legislators
In this era of
a) High cost of legislators
b) flood ravaged state
c) slum dog millionaire and many more expose of our country poverty (which is nothing but truth),
in assembly a Congress MLA (having vested interest) claimed a NGO used photos of school children abroad, Claimed children are to be fed and brought disrepute to the country by saying there are poor children and poverty. Government has not been mentioned as a partner of the program. (This government does not pay full amount. only subsidised value. The NGO does work in multiple States covering 10 lakh children)
A House Committee has been formed to investigate the usage of photo, collection of money, bringing disrepute to COUNTRY.
The terms of reference is not stopping only at this, it says all other NGOs in which trustees of this NGO are involved and their irregularities. (on vested interest of course)
1. Trust is not given any signed communication. secretary says that is how it will be. Resolution passed by the house etc. nothing is available.
2. anything talked about the whole issue will be violating privilege of house
1. Is it within the powers of house to form a committee and look into whatever it wants from whoever's account?
2. what are the real rights or privileges of the house committee?
3. what are the rights and how far the NGO is liable to dance to the tunes of EGO of MLA?
4. What legal actions it can take (like Writ to safe guard privacy) in this regard to safe guard its interest.
5. can NGO ask for video recording of whole proceedings? (there are apprehensions
6. All documents, resolutions etc. are out of RTI reach?
7. Can any legal proceeding be initiated for legislators wasting their valuable (our cost) time ?
regards
VLV
PS: Hope this is not breach of privilege to discuss