valentine thakkar
28 May 2011 at 19:45
Could any expert please provide me the format of a PIL against the malpractices of a religious institution? Is it advisable to file the writ in the HC first or directly to the SC? Please also provide details for both the cases.
Anonymous
27 May 2011 at 09:57
canara bank has stalled my monthly pension for the reason that my daugher's educational loan is outstanding.my only livlihood is pension.can i sue the bank for violating my fundamenal right to livlihod?
Manoj kumar sahu
23 May 2011 at 20:41
Dear friends,
My friend gave the UPSC Exam last year and he got very less marks then his expectations and he is very sure that he got less marks as he calculated marks just after the papers,
is there any way by which he can just see his papers and it can be rechecked with the help of indian judiciary, if there is any case law plz help me with that..
Thanking you
Anonymous
22 May 2011 at 00:57
Dear Experts,
Will the SC hear the application for permission to file additional documents.
Or is this application only for the registry to accept the additional document. Sorry this may a silly question however the application for official translation of vernacular document was ot heard by the court.
What is the procedure involved in case of application for permission to file additional documents.
Please clarify. Thanks.
Rama mohan Acharya
20 May 2011 at 09:22
A writ was filed by an Ex- employee regarding some service matter before High Court, Allhabad. The Writ was decided in his favour by a bench comprising of two judges. Management desire to file appeal against the order in the High Court. Is it permissible to file an appeal against the order of the bench in the same high court? if yes, under which provision. Kindly enlight.
Rama mohan Acharya
19 May 2011 at 16:45
can a Public authority or PIO lodge a complaint against a information seeker on the ground that he is asking a lot of information which seems to be not in the larger public interst resulting in wastage of a lot of public money and time. Incidentally the information seeker is an employee of the same public autority. If yes kindly enlight with relevant provosion / citation.
Tarun Vohra
19 May 2011 at 14:52
Acts such as the Domestic violence Act were brought in to prevent exploitation/harassment of wives largely from dowry related violence. The aim was to protect women largely from lower/lower middle class households.
I'm not sure to what extent this has succeeded, but it has given rise to a rather disturbing trend in the middle/uppermiddle class of our society.
Women/wives ( especially in the metro cities) now have husbands at their complete mercy and are blatantlly misusing these rights to intimidate their spouses. They are flooding the courts with ficticious and trumped up charges to extort large amounts of money from their husbands .
This is not an exageration. I've spoken to a number of lawyers ( both men and women) and they almost uanimously confirm the same.
Amazingly, this Act contravenes the inherant principle which says that a person is innocent until proven guilty. This Law unfortunately works on the exact reverse- the husband is assumed to be guilty until proved innocent!! It gives the wife rights over the husband's entire family and they can even be imprisoned without charges being proven against them.
Also, this seems to be aimed at only at women in a particular age group ( of marriageable age). Mothers /ladies who are senior citizens are at the complete mercy of the wives whom these laws are supposed to protect !
I also think this violates constitutional rights under Sec 14 and 21.
I'd be grateful for your opinion and would also like to file a PIL in the Supreme Court challenging the legitimacy of this draconian law.
Anonymous
16 May 2011 at 12:04
Dear Sir,
I wish to knowif autonomous bodies such as India Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO), Centre for Development of Advance Computing (CDAC), Society for Applied Microwave Electronic Engineering (SAMEER), NCERT, CSIR, Kendriya Vidhyalaya, etc set by various Ministry,under the control of Govt of India and who are enlised under Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)jurisdiction comes under Article 311 (2)as Govt employees. If so are there any Supreme Court latests ruling declaring the employees of the above autonomous bodies are protected under Article 311 (2).
Kindly enlighten me on the above subject.
Regards
G.K.Pillai
Rama mohan Acharya
14 May 2011 at 16:12
On completion of a contract, the contractor had invoked the arbitration clause. accordingly the arbitrator had been appointed by tthe competant autority. The contractor attended few proceedingd. Duribg the last proceeding, the arbitrator suggested for conciliation among parties. The process took some time. Now the contractor is not attending the arbitral proceeding in the pretext that he had filed an application under section 11(6) of the Act for appointment of new arbitraor. can he do so. What shall the arbitrator do now? since last 5 proceeding the copntracto is not attending the proceedings.
kindly advise.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
PIL
Could any expert please provide me the format of a PIL against the malpractices of a religious institution? Is it advisable to file the writ in the HC first or directly to the SC? Please also provide details of procedure for both the cases.