Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 07:32
dear sir,
in my case for possession of property against my brother who has encroached on my property the issues have been framed.
i am told by my lawyer that no fresh documents cannot be permitted to be filed unless permission of the court.
he states that fresh documents can be filed during witnesses cross examnation.
kindly enlighten.
query 2.if a signature or handwriting on a
document is denied what recource does the court take for alternate proofs.
is it handwriting expert opinion or circumstancial evidence?
does a court have an empannelled handwriting experts and if so what is the aftermath of the handwriting expert opinion.
can it be questioned and if so what option does the court normmally take
thanks
vinay kala aug 12,11
SURAJ
11 August 2011 at 14:54
hello sir, i want to do l.l.b but now i m final year student of commerce(mumbai) i just want to know that what kind of preparation i should do please suggest me if any course relating to l.l.b
Hariom Tiwari
10 August 2011 at 21:33
The applicant filed a P.A. Case which was dismissed against which appeal was filed which was allowed by the appellate court against which tenant filed a writ under Art.226which has been dissmissed by single bench of High Court Allahabad now whatis the remady for tenant petitioner
girish shringi
04 August 2011 at 22:47
Dear Members/Experts,
Today the biggest problem in the country is of Law and Order at one the another I feel is the fake currency which flow in the country is uncontrollble.
I am thinking to to apply for PIL in the Supreme Court to stop movement of the higher currency notes in India with immediate effect which will certainly stop the growth of black money at one side and the other the same will automatically stop fake currency movement in the country.
Can anyone suggest me the legality of my view and can any of you will help me out at supreme court.
Girish Shringi
(Advocate)
Anonymous
04 August 2011 at 20:22
Res. Rajkumar sir, Ramachandran sir & Sriniwas sir (And other Ld. members),
In continuation to my yester question, I am reproducing here the extract of HC order. Kindly go thoroughly and suggest, would it be as suggested by you last night?
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE…….
19th May, 2010
The petitioner is working as UDC since 1996 in the deptt. of PHE. At the relevant time he was serving in the office of the PHE sub-division at………….. While he was serving there he applied and availed casual leave on 29th, 30th and 31st August, 2005 as he was suffering from some ailments. He could not join his duties. He did not inform or apply for further leave. He overstayed for a period of 12 months from 01-09-2005 to 31-08-2006 without any authority. After 12 months, he came and joined his duties on 01.09.2006 with an application for Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL). When he joined on 01.09.2006 by submitting a joining before the Assistant Engineer, PHE sub-division, the same was forwarded to Division office.
According to the petitioner after he joined on 01-09-2006, he used to come regularly to the office but the officer concerned used to mark absent in the attendance with an assurance that the absentee statement would be rectified as soon as the acceptance of joining report is received from the higher authority.
It is stated that no communication has so far been received from the higher authority. Therefore, he made a representation dtd. 18.03.2008 before the Superintending Engineer, PHE praying for rectification of monthly attendance report. The said representation has not yet been considered and disposed of by the said superintending Engineer. No communication has been received so far in regard to the aforesaid prayer. As a result, the divisional office has denied payment of salary from the date of his joining i.e 01.09.2006 for which the petitioner is suffering from acute financial hardship in maintaining his family.
Learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate submits that a departmental proceeding is pending against the petitioner in regard to the alleged unauthorized absence. The same was initiated on 03.12.2007. A show cause notice was issued upon the petitioner through paper publication and he submitted a representation in March, 2008. There was no show-cause reply from the petitioner but in the said representation he made a request for not treating the absent period as dies non. The said representation is also pending consideration and disposal by the authorities concerned. Thereafter, an inquiry officer was appointed for conducting the departmental enquiry. The petitioner was summoned on 20th and 25th june, 2008 but on the said dates, the inquiry officer was absent.
The aforesaid departmental proceeding is pending without any progress and the main question regarding the alleged unauthorized absence has remained undecided till date.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and for the ends of justice, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions to the Chief Engineer, PHE who is the concerned authority :
(i) To take necessary steps for completion of the departmental proceeding within a period of 60 days from today in accordance with the existing rules and procedure and providing due opportunity to the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the departmental proceeding so that the same could be completed within the said specified period.
(iii) To consider and dispose of the representation dtd. 18.03.2008 with a speaking order after the conclusion of the departmental proceeding and communicate the same to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Registry shall furnish a copy of this order to Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate by tomorrow for onwards transmission to the concerned authority.
N.B: The portion submitted above by the Govt. Advocate talks about the period from 01.09.2005 to 31.08.2006.Whereas, the subject matter is from the period 01.09.2006 to till date.
Anonymous
04 August 2011 at 12:38
Respected lawyers, you are requested to kindly differentiate between Scheduled Caste and Backward Class.
Anonymous
03 August 2011 at 19:47
My writ Petition was disposed of on 19-05-2010 with a direction to the concerned authority to consider my representation/appeal after the departmental proceedings is completed.
But till today neither departmental proceeding has been initiated nor has my representation/appeal been considered. Now it seems limitation period of 1 year for the contempt proceedings has also run out.
Can anyone suggest, what can be done under such circumstances???
Anonymous
03 August 2011 at 04:00
Once the high court has given leave to appeal to the SC under sec 133 of the constitution of India can the other party challenge the validity of this appeal in the SC?
V.V.RAMDAS
31 July 2011 at 22:06
What is procedure for repealing the act and connecting law to that effect ?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Email authentication
Sir,
I did an email on 14-2-2011 to official id of a cm i.e. cmup@nic.in.I asked about action happened on that email under RTI Act.When I moved to office, earlier, officer was showing me that you did this email to cm and misbehaving with, me prior to put RTI.
After that when I put RTI to cm office, in reply of RTI, cm office had denied about the receive of email.They clearly saying we did not receive this mail.
Please suggest me what should be my next step ? How can I prove about the email, as a technical person i know if email is not properly delivered then sender receive a bounce message stating reason about not delivering. But how can it be proved in court or in state or central information commission ?
Thanks & Regards.
ar