Anonymous
19 August 2011 at 11:12
While attending the proceedings before high Court the counsel for the petitioner did not appear and his subordinate counsel took a plea that the main counsel is busy with arguments in other court.
However the Court order for Next call list objecting repeated adjournment sought by the employer.
To utmost surprise the order sheet appearing on net says for the nomination of another bench and sent the case to Chief Justice for nomination of another bench.
It appears that the clerical staff below in connivance with each other has framed this device to benefit the petitioner company.
Previously also the staff had been co-operating the petitioner company by not feeding the case.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finally settled by the present Judge three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
19 August 2011 at 10:08
While attending the proceedings before high Court the cousel for the petitioner did not appar and his subordinate counsel took a plea that the main counsel is busy with arguments in other court.
However the Court oreder for Next call list objecting repeated adjournment sought by the employer.
To utmost surprise the ordr sheet appearing on net says for tne nomination of another bench and sent the case to Chief Justise for nomination of another bench.
It appears that the clerical staff below in connivance with each other has framed this device to benefit the petitioner company.
Previously also the staff had been copertaing the petioner company by not feeding the case.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finaly settled by the present Judge three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the honble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible
Anonymous
18 August 2011 at 22:27
Under what circumstances a Judge of high court can nominate a particular case after hearing for more than 7 times in his court can place it before the Chief justice for another bench.
Non of the parties had objected.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finaly settled by the present bench three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the honble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible
Anonymous
18 August 2011 at 22:25
Under what circumstances a Judge of high court can nominate a particular case after hearing for more than 7 times in his court can place it before the Chief justice for another bench.
Non of the parties had objected.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finaly settled by the present bench three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the honble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible
Gulshan Tanwar
18 August 2011 at 10:36
What are consequences of the recently introduced Lokpal Bill 2011?
Kindly enlighten on the subject as the matter is worsening our system especially the constitution because Brahma, Vishnu & Mahesh will be in one God which cannot exist.
1. Group A services as well as Group B services as in West Bengal Police is in Group B.
2. To include Government servants who are not covered into the definitions of public servant.
3. Jurisdiction of Lokpal.
4. Final Authority to be Supreme Court.
Anonymous
17 August 2011 at 19:41
right to protest under which artilce of indian consitution
Right to strike under which article of indian Constitution.
Above mentioned are not fundamental right.
Thanks
Anonymous
13 August 2011 at 16:47
Can anyone guide as to the manner in which a Mentally Challenged adult person could apply for an Indian Passport - whether his Parents could apply for the same or any other method is there. There is absolutely no guidance available in the Website of Passport Authorities/Government of India's concerned Ministry. If anyone has clear knowledge on this issue, kindly enlighten on the same in details, such as Affidavits,documents,etc. required and the manner & method of submission of the application,etc. THANKS IN ADVANCE.
Sumir
12 August 2011 at 19:57
If any conflict arise between state law and central law, both going against each other, then which shall be followed, why?
Anonymous
12 August 2011 at 11:36
Sir,
Under an RTI application I asked about the reasons of termination of a contract employee by a central ministry.
But they denied to provide that this does not comes under that category of information, i.e. to provide reasons to citizens about something has been done or something has not been done, why or reasons.
In this manner are govt. authorities are free to do anything as per there wish and hide whole thing under this ? If not then what could be the way to get the reason for termination.
Thanks & Regards.
ar
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
chief justice of india or chief justice ?
Permission is required from the Chief Justice of India or Chief Justice of the particular High Court to even register an FIR against corrupt judges sitting on the bench? IS there any provision under the constitution of india if yes do tell me the article or any case law?
What do u mean by circuit bench ? Also is there any circuit bench in any part of India. Under which Artilce actually circuit bench provision is applicable or can be made applicable.
Thanks