Anonymous
21 December 2011 at 11:19
To start a Non veg Restaurant who will issue a valid license ? It's a matter of Pollution by a Non veg hotel in residencial areas. My municipal Athority is saying,"we are not authority to issue a such license."
Who makes rules , regulation and give guidelines to such business ?
Anonymous
21 December 2011 at 01:15
meaning of consitutional body & statutory body as per the law. if possible post the full judgment if any so i can be able to understand more.
thanks
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 22:31
Dear friends I am working on article 356 indian constitution as a researcher and need some material ,seminar papers ,articles ,case laws on the topic please help me
Regards
PEER MOHSIN
Anonymous
20 December 2011 at 12:34
Under Rule 16 of CCS (CCA) rules, 1965, the office (a central govt statutory body) have issued memo(by CEO) to Mr X in Dec 2011 on ground of imputation of misconduct. Intent to charge with minor penalty had been indicated for which explanation had been sought. The misconduct (favouring a firm in official work) had been indicated as committed around 5 years back.
2 advises of CVC recvd by office in March 2008 and Feb 2011 but never communicated to `X`by office.
Suddenly the office asked (by CEO) in Dec 2011 and asked explanation.
In 2010, office (Mr `S`) appointed `X` as Inquiry Officer (IO) in a case on Mr `A` under Rule 14 (major penalty) of CCS(CCA) Rules. The case has moved further with 3-4 hearings under the IO ship of `X`.
On receipt of above memo, `X` replied to all the facts of the case, apprehending conspiracy by some office colleagues after 6 years, requesting clean chit and also drew their attention that he was appointed IO by them(Mr `S`) a year back (irrespective of CVC advises), meaning that all is clear from vigilance side for Mr `X`. Vigilance department being custodian of all cases, knows explanation memo given to Mr `X` as well as case on `A`.
Reply submitted few days back by `X` to CEO.
After few days, in the case pertaining to Mr `A`, office reconfirmed appointment (by Mr `S`) of Mr `X` as IO in above case for moving ahead with hearings.
Now what is the position of `X`
i) Is the official explanation earlier asked (by CEO) is just an explanation sought or is it a charge sheet, though he is IO in another case.
ii) Can `X` move ahead with hearings on `A`. The official Presenting officer(PO) in `A` case knows nothing about memo given to Mr`X ` and is requesting for starting the hearings in the `A` case.
iii) or Mr`X should wait in case on `A`, till he gets clean chit from office(CEO) for his own memo.
Anonymous
19 December 2011 at 19:07
What is exact name called after amendment ed of said Act.? Its call As ICAI OR ICMAI Act 1959.
If ICWAI Question Against to eliminate name Chartered form ICAI. its valid? I again little confuse Abt What name called ICWAI OR ICAI OR ICAMI
Member (Account Deleted)
19 December 2011 at 14:35
Who shall have the power to clarify on the following issue: Is it the Supreme Court or the Judge( 3 Bench Members) who wrote the judgement but now retired?
Anonymous
16 December 2011 at 22:53
Dear LCI members,
Can anyone of you help me to provide the full syllabus of Exams of Advocate on record in supreme court to be held in june 2012? Pls. consider as urgent and thanx in advance.
Anonymous
16 December 2011 at 17:54
Hi Everybody Me and my girlfriend are planing to go on a trip of two days. So we are planing to stay in a hotel there.Is there any problem in staying in a hotel together.
And I have also heard that sometimes cops ask such couples to confirm from their parents. As I know they do so only fon some money as nobody will want his/her parent to call and confirm rather than giving some rupees to the cops. I request you guys to give some tips to tackle these cops.
please help me out.
thanx
S C KHOSLA
16 December 2011 at 15:24
In a case under CCS (CCA Rules)1965, a charged official (CO), desired change in Inquiry Officer (IO) on ground of bias in its very first Regular Hearing (RH)through a formal letter.
The IO gave stay to RH and sent the CO`s request for change in IO ship to the consideration of Disciplinary Authority (DA)as per rules.
The DA replied to CO rejecting his request for change in IO ship and marked copy of communication to IO and Presenting officer (PO) in the case.
Now on receipt of this letter in IOs office, whether IO`s stay to RH is automatically gets vaccated or IO should wait for Presenting officer (PO) formal comunication of pray for vacating the above stay in RH.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Eligibility to be appointed as district judge
Dear Friends, Please discuss about the following matter
A person has 7 years bar experiance and he joined in government service. At this juncture, whether he is eligible to be appointed as District Judge, as per article 233 (2) of the Constitutuion of India?